Cargando…

Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients

Background. Close therapeutic drug monitoring of Cyclosporine (CsA) in transplant outpatients is a favourable procedure to maintain the long-term blood drug levels within their respective narrow therapeutic ranges. Compared to basal levels (C(0)), CsA peak levels (C(2)) are more predictive for trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leichtle, Alexander Benedikt, Ceglarek, Uta, Witzigmann, Helmut, Gäbel, Gábor, Thiery, Joachim, Fiedler, Georg Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20652037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/201918
_version_ 1782184001057849344
author Leichtle, Alexander Benedikt
Ceglarek, Uta
Witzigmann, Helmut
Gäbel, Gábor
Thiery, Joachim
Fiedler, Georg Martin
author_facet Leichtle, Alexander Benedikt
Ceglarek, Uta
Witzigmann, Helmut
Gäbel, Gábor
Thiery, Joachim
Fiedler, Georg Martin
author_sort Leichtle, Alexander Benedikt
collection PubMed
description Background. Close therapeutic drug monitoring of Cyclosporine (CsA) in transplant outpatients is a favourable procedure to maintain the long-term blood drug levels within their respective narrow therapeutic ranges. Compared to basal levels (C(0)), CsA peak levels (C(2)) are more predictive for transplant rejection. However, the application of C(2) levels is hampered by the precise time of blood sampling and the need of qualified personnel. Therefore, we evaluated a new C(2) self-obtained blood sampling in transplant outpatients using dried capillary and venous blood samples and compared the CsA levels, stability, and clinical practicability of the different procedures. Methods. 55 solid organ transplant recipients were instructed to use single-handed sampling of each 50 μL capillary blood and dried blood spots by finger prick using standard finger prick devices. We used standardized EDTA-coated capillary blood collection systems and standardized filter paper WS 903. CsA was determined by LC-MS/MS. The patients and technicians also answered a questionnaire on the procedure and sample quality. Results. The C(0) and C(2) levels from capillary blood collection systems (C(0) [ng/mL]: 114.5 ± 44.5; C(2): 578.2 ± 222.2) and capillary dried blood (C(0) [ng/mL]: 175.4 ± 137.7; C(2): 743.1 ± 368.1) significantly (P < .01) correlated with the drug levels of the venous blood samples (C(0) [ng/mL]: 97.8 ± 37.4; C(2): 511.2 ± 201.5). The correlation at C(0) was ρ ((cap.-ven.)) = 0.749, and ρ ((dried blood-ven)) = 0.432; at C(2): ρ ((cap.-ven.)) = 0.861 and ρ ((dried blood-ven)) = 0.711. The patients preferred the dried blood sampling because of the more simple and less painful procedure. Additionally, the sample quality of self-obtained dried blood spots for LC-MS/MS analytics was superior to the respective capillary blood samples. Conclusions. C(2) self-obtained dried blood sampling can easily be performed by transplant outpatients and is therefore suitable and cost-effective for close therapeutic drug monitoring.
format Text
id pubmed-2905903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29059032010-07-22 Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients Leichtle, Alexander Benedikt Ceglarek, Uta Witzigmann, Helmut Gäbel, Gábor Thiery, Joachim Fiedler, Georg Martin J Transplant Clinical Study Background. Close therapeutic drug monitoring of Cyclosporine (CsA) in transplant outpatients is a favourable procedure to maintain the long-term blood drug levels within their respective narrow therapeutic ranges. Compared to basal levels (C(0)), CsA peak levels (C(2)) are more predictive for transplant rejection. However, the application of C(2) levels is hampered by the precise time of blood sampling and the need of qualified personnel. Therefore, we evaluated a new C(2) self-obtained blood sampling in transplant outpatients using dried capillary and venous blood samples and compared the CsA levels, stability, and clinical practicability of the different procedures. Methods. 55 solid organ transplant recipients were instructed to use single-handed sampling of each 50 μL capillary blood and dried blood spots by finger prick using standard finger prick devices. We used standardized EDTA-coated capillary blood collection systems and standardized filter paper WS 903. CsA was determined by LC-MS/MS. The patients and technicians also answered a questionnaire on the procedure and sample quality. Results. The C(0) and C(2) levels from capillary blood collection systems (C(0) [ng/mL]: 114.5 ± 44.5; C(2): 578.2 ± 222.2) and capillary dried blood (C(0) [ng/mL]: 175.4 ± 137.7; C(2): 743.1 ± 368.1) significantly (P < .01) correlated with the drug levels of the venous blood samples (C(0) [ng/mL]: 97.8 ± 37.4; C(2): 511.2 ± 201.5). The correlation at C(0) was ρ ((cap.-ven.)) = 0.749, and ρ ((dried blood-ven)) = 0.432; at C(2): ρ ((cap.-ven.)) = 0.861 and ρ ((dried blood-ven)) = 0.711. The patients preferred the dried blood sampling because of the more simple and less painful procedure. Additionally, the sample quality of self-obtained dried blood spots for LC-MS/MS analytics was superior to the respective capillary blood samples. Conclusions. C(2) self-obtained dried blood sampling can easily be performed by transplant outpatients and is therefore suitable and cost-effective for close therapeutic drug monitoring. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2905903/ /pubmed/20652037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/201918 Text en Copyright © 2010 Alexander Benedikt Leichtle et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Leichtle, Alexander Benedikt
Ceglarek, Uta
Witzigmann, Helmut
Gäbel, Gábor
Thiery, Joachim
Fiedler, Georg Martin
Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients
title Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients
title_full Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients
title_fullStr Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients
title_full_unstemmed Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients
title_short Potential of Dried Blood Self-Sampling for Cyclosporine C(2) Monitoring in Transplant Outpatients
title_sort potential of dried blood self-sampling for cyclosporine c(2) monitoring in transplant outpatients
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20652037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/201918
work_keys_str_mv AT leichtlealexanderbenedikt potentialofdriedbloodselfsamplingforcyclosporinec2monitoringintransplantoutpatients
AT ceglarekuta potentialofdriedbloodselfsamplingforcyclosporinec2monitoringintransplantoutpatients
AT witzigmannhelmut potentialofdriedbloodselfsamplingforcyclosporinec2monitoringintransplantoutpatients
AT gabelgabor potentialofdriedbloodselfsamplingforcyclosporinec2monitoringintransplantoutpatients
AT thieryjoachim potentialofdriedbloodselfsamplingforcyclosporinec2monitoringintransplantoutpatients
AT fiedlergeorgmartin potentialofdriedbloodselfsamplingforcyclosporinec2monitoringintransplantoutpatients