Cargando…

3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre

BACKGROUND: Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using the Gamma Nail has been performed since 1988 and is today well established and wide-spread. However, a number of reports have raised serious concerns about the implant's complication rate. The main focus has been the increased risk of a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bojan, Alicja J, Beimel, Claudia, Speitling, Andreas, Taglang, Gilbert, Ekholm, Carl, Jönsson, Anders
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2906434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-133
_version_ 1782184025268420608
author Bojan, Alicja J
Beimel, Claudia
Speitling, Andreas
Taglang, Gilbert
Ekholm, Carl
Jönsson, Anders
author_facet Bojan, Alicja J
Beimel, Claudia
Speitling, Andreas
Taglang, Gilbert
Ekholm, Carl
Jönsson, Anders
author_sort Bojan, Alicja J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using the Gamma Nail has been performed since 1988 and is today well established and wide-spread. However, a number of reports have raised serious concerns about the implant's complication rate. The main focus has been the increased risk of a subsequent femoral shaft fracture and some authors have argued against its use despite other obvious advantages, when this implant is employed. Through access to a uniquely large patient data base available, which is available for analysis of trochanteric fractures; we have been able to evaluate the performance of the Gamma Nail over a twelve year period. METHODS: 3066 consecutive patients were treated for trochanteric fractures using Gamma Nails between 1990 and 2002 at the Centre de Traumatologie et de l'Orthopedie (CTO), Strasbourg, France. These patients were retrospectively analysed. Information on epidemiological data, intra- and postoperative complications and patients' outcome was retrieved from patient notes. All available radiographs were assessed by a single reviewer (AJB). RESULTS: The results showed a low complication rate with the use of the Gamma Nail. There were 137 (4.5%) intraoperative fracture-related complications. Moreover 189 (6.2%) complications were detected postoperatively and during follow-up. Cut-out of the lag screw from the femoral head was the most frequent mechanical complication (57 patients, 1.85%), whereas a postoperative femoral shaft fracture occurred in 19 patients (0.6%). Other complications, such as infection, delayed healing/non-union, avascular femoral head necrosis and distal locking problems occurred in 113 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Gamma Nail in trochanteric hip fractures is a safe method with a low complication rate. In particular, a low rate of femoral shaft fractures was reported. The low complication rate reported in this series can probably be explained by strict adherence to a proper surgical technique.
format Text
id pubmed-2906434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29064342010-07-20 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre Bojan, Alicja J Beimel, Claudia Speitling, Andreas Taglang, Gilbert Ekholm, Carl Jönsson, Anders BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using the Gamma Nail has been performed since 1988 and is today well established and wide-spread. However, a number of reports have raised serious concerns about the implant's complication rate. The main focus has been the increased risk of a subsequent femoral shaft fracture and some authors have argued against its use despite other obvious advantages, when this implant is employed. Through access to a uniquely large patient data base available, which is available for analysis of trochanteric fractures; we have been able to evaluate the performance of the Gamma Nail over a twelve year period. METHODS: 3066 consecutive patients were treated for trochanteric fractures using Gamma Nails between 1990 and 2002 at the Centre de Traumatologie et de l'Orthopedie (CTO), Strasbourg, France. These patients were retrospectively analysed. Information on epidemiological data, intra- and postoperative complications and patients' outcome was retrieved from patient notes. All available radiographs were assessed by a single reviewer (AJB). RESULTS: The results showed a low complication rate with the use of the Gamma Nail. There were 137 (4.5%) intraoperative fracture-related complications. Moreover 189 (6.2%) complications were detected postoperatively and during follow-up. Cut-out of the lag screw from the femoral head was the most frequent mechanical complication (57 patients, 1.85%), whereas a postoperative femoral shaft fracture occurred in 19 patients (0.6%). Other complications, such as infection, delayed healing/non-union, avascular femoral head necrosis and distal locking problems occurred in 113 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Gamma Nail in trochanteric hip fractures is a safe method with a low complication rate. In particular, a low rate of femoral shaft fractures was reported. The low complication rate reported in this series can probably be explained by strict adherence to a proper surgical technique. BioMed Central 2010-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2906434/ /pubmed/20579384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-133 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bojan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bojan, Alicja J
Beimel, Claudia
Speitling, Andreas
Taglang, Gilbert
Ekholm, Carl
Jönsson, Anders
3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
title 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
title_full 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
title_fullStr 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
title_full_unstemmed 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
title_short 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
title_sort 3066 consecutive gamma nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2906434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-133
work_keys_str_mv AT bojanalicjaj 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre
AT beimelclaudia 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre
AT speitlingandreas 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre
AT taglanggilbert 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre
AT ekholmcarl 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre
AT jonssonanders 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre