Cargando…
3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre
BACKGROUND: Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using the Gamma Nail has been performed since 1988 and is today well established and wide-spread. However, a number of reports have raised serious concerns about the implant's complication rate. The main focus has been the increased risk of a s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2906434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-133 |
_version_ | 1782184025268420608 |
---|---|
author | Bojan, Alicja J Beimel, Claudia Speitling, Andreas Taglang, Gilbert Ekholm, Carl Jönsson, Anders |
author_facet | Bojan, Alicja J Beimel, Claudia Speitling, Andreas Taglang, Gilbert Ekholm, Carl Jönsson, Anders |
author_sort | Bojan, Alicja J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using the Gamma Nail has been performed since 1988 and is today well established and wide-spread. However, a number of reports have raised serious concerns about the implant's complication rate. The main focus has been the increased risk of a subsequent femoral shaft fracture and some authors have argued against its use despite other obvious advantages, when this implant is employed. Through access to a uniquely large patient data base available, which is available for analysis of trochanteric fractures; we have been able to evaluate the performance of the Gamma Nail over a twelve year period. METHODS: 3066 consecutive patients were treated for trochanteric fractures using Gamma Nails between 1990 and 2002 at the Centre de Traumatologie et de l'Orthopedie (CTO), Strasbourg, France. These patients were retrospectively analysed. Information on epidemiological data, intra- and postoperative complications and patients' outcome was retrieved from patient notes. All available radiographs were assessed by a single reviewer (AJB). RESULTS: The results showed a low complication rate with the use of the Gamma Nail. There were 137 (4.5%) intraoperative fracture-related complications. Moreover 189 (6.2%) complications were detected postoperatively and during follow-up. Cut-out of the lag screw from the femoral head was the most frequent mechanical complication (57 patients, 1.85%), whereas a postoperative femoral shaft fracture occurred in 19 patients (0.6%). Other complications, such as infection, delayed healing/non-union, avascular femoral head necrosis and distal locking problems occurred in 113 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Gamma Nail in trochanteric hip fractures is a safe method with a low complication rate. In particular, a low rate of femoral shaft fractures was reported. The low complication rate reported in this series can probably be explained by strict adherence to a proper surgical technique. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2906434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29064342010-07-20 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre Bojan, Alicja J Beimel, Claudia Speitling, Andreas Taglang, Gilbert Ekholm, Carl Jönsson, Anders BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using the Gamma Nail has been performed since 1988 and is today well established and wide-spread. However, a number of reports have raised serious concerns about the implant's complication rate. The main focus has been the increased risk of a subsequent femoral shaft fracture and some authors have argued against its use despite other obvious advantages, when this implant is employed. Through access to a uniquely large patient data base available, which is available for analysis of trochanteric fractures; we have been able to evaluate the performance of the Gamma Nail over a twelve year period. METHODS: 3066 consecutive patients were treated for trochanteric fractures using Gamma Nails between 1990 and 2002 at the Centre de Traumatologie et de l'Orthopedie (CTO), Strasbourg, France. These patients were retrospectively analysed. Information on epidemiological data, intra- and postoperative complications and patients' outcome was retrieved from patient notes. All available radiographs were assessed by a single reviewer (AJB). RESULTS: The results showed a low complication rate with the use of the Gamma Nail. There were 137 (4.5%) intraoperative fracture-related complications. Moreover 189 (6.2%) complications were detected postoperatively and during follow-up. Cut-out of the lag screw from the femoral head was the most frequent mechanical complication (57 patients, 1.85%), whereas a postoperative femoral shaft fracture occurred in 19 patients (0.6%). Other complications, such as infection, delayed healing/non-union, avascular femoral head necrosis and distal locking problems occurred in 113 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Gamma Nail in trochanteric hip fractures is a safe method with a low complication rate. In particular, a low rate of femoral shaft fractures was reported. The low complication rate reported in this series can probably be explained by strict adherence to a proper surgical technique. BioMed Central 2010-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2906434/ /pubmed/20579384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-133 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bojan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bojan, Alicja J Beimel, Claudia Speitling, Andreas Taglang, Gilbert Ekholm, Carl Jönsson, Anders 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre |
title | 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre |
title_full | 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre |
title_fullStr | 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre |
title_full_unstemmed | 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre |
title_short | 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre |
title_sort | 3066 consecutive gamma nails. 12 years experience at a single centre |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2906434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bojanalicjaj 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre AT beimelclaudia 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre AT speitlingandreas 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre AT taglanggilbert 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre AT ekholmcarl 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre AT jonssonanders 3066consecutivegammanails12yearsexperienceatasinglecentre |