Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts

BACKGROUND: The hepatic stellate cell is the primary cell type responsible for the excessive formation and deposition of connective tissue elements during the development of hepatic fibrosis in chronically injured liver. Culturing quiescent hepatic stellate cells on plastic causes spontaneous activa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiskirchen, Ralf, Kneifel, Jens, Weiskirchen, Sabine, van de Leur, Eddy, Kunz, Dagmar, Gressner, Axel M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC29065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11178102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-1-4
_version_ 1782119958030843904
author Weiskirchen, Ralf
Kneifel, Jens
Weiskirchen, Sabine
van de Leur, Eddy
Kunz, Dagmar
Gressner, Axel M
author_facet Weiskirchen, Ralf
Kneifel, Jens
Weiskirchen, Sabine
van de Leur, Eddy
Kunz, Dagmar
Gressner, Axel M
author_sort Weiskirchen, Ralf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The hepatic stellate cell is the primary cell type responsible for the excessive formation and deposition of connective tissue elements during the development of hepatic fibrosis in chronically injured liver. Culturing quiescent hepatic stellate cells on plastic causes spontaneous activation leading to a myofibroblastic phenotype similar to that seen in vivo. This provides a simple model system for studying activation and transdifferentiation of these cells. The introduction of exogenous DNA into these cells is discussed controversially mainly due to the lack of systematic analysis. Therefore, we examined comparatively five nonviral, lipid-mediated gene transfer methods and adenoviral based infection, as potential tools for efficient delivery of DNA to rat hepatic stellate cells and their transdifferentiated counterpart, i.e. myofibroblasts. Transfection conditions were determined using enhanced green fluorescent protein as a reporter expressed under the transcriptional control of the human cytomegalovirus immediate early gene 1 promoter/enhancer. RESULTS: With the use of chemically enhanced transfection methods, the highest relative efficiency was obtained with FuGENE™6 gene mediated DNA transfer. Quantitative evaluation of representative transfection experiments by flow cytometry revealed that approximately 6% of the rat hepatic stellate cells were transfected. None of the transfection methods tested was able to mediate gene delivery to rat myofibroblasts. To analyze if rat hepatic stellate cells and myofibroblasts are susceptible to adenoviral infection, we have inserted the transgenic expression cassette into a recombinant adenoviral type 5 genome as replacement for the E1 region. Viral particles of this replication-deficient Ad5-based reporter are able to infect 100% of rat hepatic stellate cells and myofibroblasts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that FuGENE™6-based methods may be optimized sufficiently to offer a feasible approach for gene transfer into rat hepatic stellate cells. The data further demonstrate that adenoviral mediated transfer is a promising approach for gene delivery to these hepatic cells.
format Text
id pubmed-29065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-290652001-03-22 Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts Weiskirchen, Ralf Kneifel, Jens Weiskirchen, Sabine van de Leur, Eddy Kunz, Dagmar Gressner, Axel M BMC Cell Biol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The hepatic stellate cell is the primary cell type responsible for the excessive formation and deposition of connective tissue elements during the development of hepatic fibrosis in chronically injured liver. Culturing quiescent hepatic stellate cells on plastic causes spontaneous activation leading to a myofibroblastic phenotype similar to that seen in vivo. This provides a simple model system for studying activation and transdifferentiation of these cells. The introduction of exogenous DNA into these cells is discussed controversially mainly due to the lack of systematic analysis. Therefore, we examined comparatively five nonviral, lipid-mediated gene transfer methods and adenoviral based infection, as potential tools for efficient delivery of DNA to rat hepatic stellate cells and their transdifferentiated counterpart, i.e. myofibroblasts. Transfection conditions were determined using enhanced green fluorescent protein as a reporter expressed under the transcriptional control of the human cytomegalovirus immediate early gene 1 promoter/enhancer. RESULTS: With the use of chemically enhanced transfection methods, the highest relative efficiency was obtained with FuGENE™6 gene mediated DNA transfer. Quantitative evaluation of representative transfection experiments by flow cytometry revealed that approximately 6% of the rat hepatic stellate cells were transfected. None of the transfection methods tested was able to mediate gene delivery to rat myofibroblasts. To analyze if rat hepatic stellate cells and myofibroblasts are susceptible to adenoviral infection, we have inserted the transgenic expression cassette into a recombinant adenoviral type 5 genome as replacement for the E1 region. Viral particles of this replication-deficient Ad5-based reporter are able to infect 100% of rat hepatic stellate cells and myofibroblasts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that FuGENE™6-based methods may be optimized sufficiently to offer a feasible approach for gene transfer into rat hepatic stellate cells. The data further demonstrate that adenoviral mediated transfer is a promising approach for gene delivery to these hepatic cells. BioMed Central 2000-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC29065/ /pubmed/11178102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-1-4 Text en Copyright © 2000 Weiskirchen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Weiskirchen, Ralf
Kneifel, Jens
Weiskirchen, Sabine
van de Leur, Eddy
Kunz, Dagmar
Gressner, Axel M
Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts
title Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts
title_full Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts
title_short Comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts
title_sort comparative evaluation of gene delivery devices in primary cultures of rat hepatic stellate cells and rat myofibroblasts
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC29065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11178102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-1-4
work_keys_str_mv AT weiskirchenralf comparativeevaluationofgenedeliverydevicesinprimaryculturesofrathepaticstellatecellsandratmyofibroblasts
AT kneifeljens comparativeevaluationofgenedeliverydevicesinprimaryculturesofrathepaticstellatecellsandratmyofibroblasts
AT weiskirchensabine comparativeevaluationofgenedeliverydevicesinprimaryculturesofrathepaticstellatecellsandratmyofibroblasts
AT vandeleureddy comparativeevaluationofgenedeliverydevicesinprimaryculturesofrathepaticstellatecellsandratmyofibroblasts
AT kunzdagmar comparativeevaluationofgenedeliverydevicesinprimaryculturesofrathepaticstellatecellsandratmyofibroblasts
AT gressneraxelm comparativeevaluationofgenedeliverydevicesinprimaryculturesofrathepaticstellatecellsandratmyofibroblasts