Cargando…
The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
BACKGROUND: Alcohol abuse results in problems on various levels in society. In terms of health, alcohol abuse is not only an important risk factor for chronic disease, but it is also related to injuries. Social harms which can be related to drinking include interpersonal problems, work problems, vio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-15 |
_version_ | 1782184096164741120 |
---|---|
author | van Gils, Paul F Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H van den Berg, Matthijs Tariq, Luqman de Wit, G Ardine |
author_facet | van Gils, Paul F Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H van den Berg, Matthijs Tariq, Luqman de Wit, G Ardine |
author_sort | van Gils, Paul F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alcohol abuse results in problems on various levels in society. In terms of health, alcohol abuse is not only an important risk factor for chronic disease, but it is also related to injuries. Social harms which can be related to drinking include interpersonal problems, work problems, violent and other crimes. The scope of societal costs related to alcohol abuse in principle should be the same for both economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies. In general, economic evaluations report a small part of all societal costs. To determine the cost- effectiveness of an intervention it is necessary that all costs and benefits are included. The purpose of this study is to describe and quantify the difference in societal costs incorporated in economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies on alcohol abuse. METHOD: To investigate the economic costs attributable to alcohol in cost-of-illness studies we used the results of a recent systematic review (June 2009). We performed a PubMed search to identify economic evaluations on alcohol interventions. Only economic evaluations in which two or more interventions were compared from a societal perspective were included. The proportion of health care costs and the proportion of societal costs were estimated in both type of studies. RESULTS: The proportion of healthcare costs in cost-of-illness studies was 17% and the proportion of societal costs 83%. In economic evaluations, the proportion of healthcare costs was 57%, and the proportion of societal costs was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: The costs included in economic evaluations performed from a societal perspective do not correspond with those included in cost-of-illness studies. Economic evaluations on alcohol abuse underreport true societal cost of alcohol abuse. When considering implementation of alcohol abuse interventions, policy makers should take into account that economic evaluations from the societal perspective might underestimate the total effects and costs of interventions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2907313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29073132010-07-21 The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations van Gils, Paul F Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H van den Berg, Matthijs Tariq, Luqman de Wit, G Ardine Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: Alcohol abuse results in problems on various levels in society. In terms of health, alcohol abuse is not only an important risk factor for chronic disease, but it is also related to injuries. Social harms which can be related to drinking include interpersonal problems, work problems, violent and other crimes. The scope of societal costs related to alcohol abuse in principle should be the same for both economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies. In general, economic evaluations report a small part of all societal costs. To determine the cost- effectiveness of an intervention it is necessary that all costs and benefits are included. The purpose of this study is to describe and quantify the difference in societal costs incorporated in economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies on alcohol abuse. METHOD: To investigate the economic costs attributable to alcohol in cost-of-illness studies we used the results of a recent systematic review (June 2009). We performed a PubMed search to identify economic evaluations on alcohol interventions. Only economic evaluations in which two or more interventions were compared from a societal perspective were included. The proportion of health care costs and the proportion of societal costs were estimated in both type of studies. RESULTS: The proportion of healthcare costs in cost-of-illness studies was 17% and the proportion of societal costs 83%. In economic evaluations, the proportion of healthcare costs was 57%, and the proportion of societal costs was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: The costs included in economic evaluations performed from a societal perspective do not correspond with those included in cost-of-illness studies. Economic evaluations on alcohol abuse underreport true societal cost of alcohol abuse. When considering implementation of alcohol abuse interventions, policy makers should take into account that economic evaluations from the societal perspective might underestimate the total effects and costs of interventions. BioMed Central 2010-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2907313/ /pubmed/20602804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-15 Text en Copyright ©2010 van Gils et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review van Gils, Paul F Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H van den Berg, Matthijs Tariq, Luqman de Wit, G Ardine The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations |
title | The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations |
title_full | The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations |
title_fullStr | The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations |
title_full_unstemmed | The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations |
title_short | The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations |
title_sort | scope of costs in alcohol studies: cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vangilspaulf thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT hambergvanreenenheleenh thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT vandenbergmatthijs thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT tariqluqman thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT dewitgardine thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT vangilspaulf scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT hambergvanreenenheleenh scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT vandenbergmatthijs scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT tariqluqman scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations AT dewitgardine scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations |