Cargando…

The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations

BACKGROUND: Alcohol abuse results in problems on various levels in society. In terms of health, alcohol abuse is not only an important risk factor for chronic disease, but it is also related to injuries. Social harms which can be related to drinking include interpersonal problems, work problems, vio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Gils, Paul F, Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H, van den Berg, Matthijs, Tariq, Luqman, de Wit, G Ardine
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-15
_version_ 1782184096164741120
author van Gils, Paul F
Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H
van den Berg, Matthijs
Tariq, Luqman
de Wit, G Ardine
author_facet van Gils, Paul F
Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H
van den Berg, Matthijs
Tariq, Luqman
de Wit, G Ardine
author_sort van Gils, Paul F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alcohol abuse results in problems on various levels in society. In terms of health, alcohol abuse is not only an important risk factor for chronic disease, but it is also related to injuries. Social harms which can be related to drinking include interpersonal problems, work problems, violent and other crimes. The scope of societal costs related to alcohol abuse in principle should be the same for both economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies. In general, economic evaluations report a small part of all societal costs. To determine the cost- effectiveness of an intervention it is necessary that all costs and benefits are included. The purpose of this study is to describe and quantify the difference in societal costs incorporated in economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies on alcohol abuse. METHOD: To investigate the economic costs attributable to alcohol in cost-of-illness studies we used the results of a recent systematic review (June 2009). We performed a PubMed search to identify economic evaluations on alcohol interventions. Only economic evaluations in which two or more interventions were compared from a societal perspective were included. The proportion of health care costs and the proportion of societal costs were estimated in both type of studies. RESULTS: The proportion of healthcare costs in cost-of-illness studies was 17% and the proportion of societal costs 83%. In economic evaluations, the proportion of healthcare costs was 57%, and the proportion of societal costs was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: The costs included in economic evaluations performed from a societal perspective do not correspond with those included in cost-of-illness studies. Economic evaluations on alcohol abuse underreport true societal cost of alcohol abuse. When considering implementation of alcohol abuse interventions, policy makers should take into account that economic evaluations from the societal perspective might underestimate the total effects and costs of interventions.
format Text
id pubmed-2907313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29073132010-07-21 The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations van Gils, Paul F Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H van den Berg, Matthijs Tariq, Luqman de Wit, G Ardine Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: Alcohol abuse results in problems on various levels in society. In terms of health, alcohol abuse is not only an important risk factor for chronic disease, but it is also related to injuries. Social harms which can be related to drinking include interpersonal problems, work problems, violent and other crimes. The scope of societal costs related to alcohol abuse in principle should be the same for both economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies. In general, economic evaluations report a small part of all societal costs. To determine the cost- effectiveness of an intervention it is necessary that all costs and benefits are included. The purpose of this study is to describe and quantify the difference in societal costs incorporated in economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies on alcohol abuse. METHOD: To investigate the economic costs attributable to alcohol in cost-of-illness studies we used the results of a recent systematic review (June 2009). We performed a PubMed search to identify economic evaluations on alcohol interventions. Only economic evaluations in which two or more interventions were compared from a societal perspective were included. The proportion of health care costs and the proportion of societal costs were estimated in both type of studies. RESULTS: The proportion of healthcare costs in cost-of-illness studies was 17% and the proportion of societal costs 83%. In economic evaluations, the proportion of healthcare costs was 57%, and the proportion of societal costs was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: The costs included in economic evaluations performed from a societal perspective do not correspond with those included in cost-of-illness studies. Economic evaluations on alcohol abuse underreport true societal cost of alcohol abuse. When considering implementation of alcohol abuse interventions, policy makers should take into account that economic evaluations from the societal perspective might underestimate the total effects and costs of interventions. BioMed Central 2010-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2907313/ /pubmed/20602804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-15 Text en Copyright ©2010 van Gils et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
van Gils, Paul F
Hamberg-van Reenen, Heleen H
van den Berg, Matthijs
Tariq, Luqman
de Wit, G Ardine
The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
title The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
title_full The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
title_fullStr The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
title_full_unstemmed The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
title_short The scope of costs in alcohol studies: Cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
title_sort scope of costs in alcohol studies: cost-of-illness studies differ from economic evaluations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-15
work_keys_str_mv AT vangilspaulf thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT hambergvanreenenheleenh thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT vandenbergmatthijs thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT tariqluqman thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT dewitgardine thescopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT vangilspaulf scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT hambergvanreenenheleenh scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT vandenbergmatthijs scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT tariqluqman scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations
AT dewitgardine scopeofcostsinalcoholstudiescostofillnessstudiesdifferfromeconomicevaluations