Cargando…

Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) at an early stage improves survival. To what extent any delay affects outcome once patients are symptomatic is still unclear. Our objectives were to evaluate the association between diagnostic delay and survival in symptomatic patients with early stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S, Oort, Frank A, van der Hulst, René WM, Coupé, Veerle MH, Craanen, Mike E, Meijer, Gerrit A, Morsink, Linde M, Visser, Otto, van Wanrooij, Roy LJ, Mulder, Chris JJ
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20584274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-332
_version_ 1782184103179714560
author Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S
Oort, Frank A
van der Hulst, René WM
Coupé, Veerle MH
Craanen, Mike E
Meijer, Gerrit A
Morsink, Linde M
Visser, Otto
van Wanrooij, Roy LJ
Mulder, Chris JJ
author_facet Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S
Oort, Frank A
van der Hulst, René WM
Coupé, Veerle MH
Craanen, Mike E
Meijer, Gerrit A
Morsink, Linde M
Visser, Otto
van Wanrooij, Roy LJ
Mulder, Chris JJ
author_sort Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) at an early stage improves survival. To what extent any delay affects outcome once patients are symptomatic is still unclear. Our objectives were to evaluate the association between diagnostic delay and survival in symptomatic patients with early stage CRC and late stage CRC. METHODS: Prospective population-based observational study evaluating daily clinical practice in Northern Holland. Diagnostic delay was determined through questionnaire-interviews. Dukes' stage was classified into two groups: early stage (Dukes A or B) and late stage (Dukes C or D) cancer. Patients were followed up for 3.5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 272 patients were available for analysis. Early stage CRC was present in 136 patients while 136 patients had late stage CRC. The mean total diagnostic delay (SE) was 31 (1.5) weeks in all CRC patients. No significant difference was observed in the mean total diagnostic delay in early versus late stage CRC (p = 0.27). In early stage CRC, no difference in survival was observed between patients with total diagnostic delay shorter and longer than the median (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank p = 0.93). In late stage CRC, patients with a diagnostic delay shorter than the median had a shorter survival than patients with a diagnostic delay longer than the median (log-rank p = 0.01). In the multivariate Cox regression model with survival as dependent variable and median delay, age, open access endoscopy, number and type of symptoms as independent variables, the odd's ratio for survival in patients with long delay (>median) versus short delay (≤median) was 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 3.0; p = 0.01). Tumor-site was not associated with patient survival. When separating late stage CRC in Dukes C and Dukes D tumors, a shorter delay was associated with a shorter survival in Dukes D tumors only and not in Dukes C tumors. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic CRC patients, a longer diagnostic and therapeutic delay in routine clinical practice was not associated with an adverse effect on survival. The time to CRC diagnosis and initiation of treatment did not differ between early stage and late stage colorectal cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-2907342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29073422010-07-21 Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S Oort, Frank A van der Hulst, René WM Coupé, Veerle MH Craanen, Mike E Meijer, Gerrit A Morsink, Linde M Visser, Otto van Wanrooij, Roy LJ Mulder, Chris JJ BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) at an early stage improves survival. To what extent any delay affects outcome once patients are symptomatic is still unclear. Our objectives were to evaluate the association between diagnostic delay and survival in symptomatic patients with early stage CRC and late stage CRC. METHODS: Prospective population-based observational study evaluating daily clinical practice in Northern Holland. Diagnostic delay was determined through questionnaire-interviews. Dukes' stage was classified into two groups: early stage (Dukes A or B) and late stage (Dukes C or D) cancer. Patients were followed up for 3.5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 272 patients were available for analysis. Early stage CRC was present in 136 patients while 136 patients had late stage CRC. The mean total diagnostic delay (SE) was 31 (1.5) weeks in all CRC patients. No significant difference was observed in the mean total diagnostic delay in early versus late stage CRC (p = 0.27). In early stage CRC, no difference in survival was observed between patients with total diagnostic delay shorter and longer than the median (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank p = 0.93). In late stage CRC, patients with a diagnostic delay shorter than the median had a shorter survival than patients with a diagnostic delay longer than the median (log-rank p = 0.01). In the multivariate Cox regression model with survival as dependent variable and median delay, age, open access endoscopy, number and type of symptoms as independent variables, the odd's ratio for survival in patients with long delay (>median) versus short delay (≤median) was 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 3.0; p = 0.01). Tumor-site was not associated with patient survival. When separating late stage CRC in Dukes C and Dukes D tumors, a shorter delay was associated with a shorter survival in Dukes D tumors only and not in Dukes C tumors. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic CRC patients, a longer diagnostic and therapeutic delay in routine clinical practice was not associated with an adverse effect on survival. The time to CRC diagnosis and initiation of treatment did not differ between early stage and late stage colorectal cancer. BioMed Central 2010-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2907342/ /pubmed/20584274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-332 Text en Copyright ©2010 Terhaar sive Droste et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S
Oort, Frank A
van der Hulst, René WM
Coupé, Veerle MH
Craanen, Mike E
Meijer, Gerrit A
Morsink, Linde M
Visser, Otto
van Wanrooij, Roy LJ
Mulder, Chris JJ
Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study
title Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study
title_full Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study
title_fullStr Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study
title_full_unstemmed Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study
title_short Does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? A population-based observational study
title_sort does delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients affect tumor stage and survival? a population-based observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20584274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-332
work_keys_str_mv AT terhaarsivedrostejochims doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT oortfranka doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT vanderhulstrenewm doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT coupeveerlemh doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT craanenmikee doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT meijergerrita doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT morsinklindem doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT visserotto doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT vanwanrooijroylj doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy
AT mulderchrisjj doesdelayindiagnosingcolorectalcancerinsymptomaticpatientsaffecttumorstageandsurvivalapopulationbasedobservationalstudy