Cargando…

Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study

Objective To assess whether equity exists in access to renal transplantation in the UK after adjustment for case mix in incident patients with end stage renal disease. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting UK Renal Registry and UK Transplant Registry. Participants All incident renal replacement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravanan, R, Udayaraj, U, Ansell, D, Collett, D, Johnson, R, O’Neill, J, Tomson, C R V, Dudley, C R K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3451
Descripción
Sumario:Objective To assess whether equity exists in access to renal transplantation in the UK after adjustment for case mix in incident patients with end stage renal disease. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting UK Renal Registry and UK Transplant Registry. Participants All incident renal replacement treatment patients (n=16 202) from 65 renal centres submitting data to the UK Renal Registry between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005, followed until 31 December 2008 (or until transplantation or death, whichever was earliest). Outcome measures Proportion of incident dialysis patients at each renal centre who were registered on the national transplant list; time taken to achieve registration; and proportion of patients subsequently transplanted. Results We found that recipients’ age, ethnicity, and primary renal diagnosis were associated with the likelihood of accessing the waiting list or receiving a transplant. After adjustment for case mix, significant inter-centre variability existed in access to the transplant list (change in −2LogL=89.9, df=1, P<0.001), in the time taken to register patients on the waiting list (change in −2LogL=247.4, df=64, P<0.001), in receipt of a renal transplant from a donor after brain stem death (change in −2LogL=15.1, df=1, P=0.001), and in receipt of a renal transplant from a living donor or a donor after cardiac death (change in −2LogL=46.1, df=1, P<0.001). Conclusions Significant variation in access to renal transplantation exists between centres within the UK that cannot be explained by differences in case mix.