Cargando…

Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study

Objective To assess whether equity exists in access to renal transplantation in the UK after adjustment for case mix in incident patients with end stage renal disease. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting UK Renal Registry and UK Transplant Registry. Participants All incident renal replacement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravanan, R, Udayaraj, U, Ansell, D, Collett, D, Johnson, R, O’Neill, J, Tomson, C R V, Dudley, C R K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3451
_version_ 1782184116855242752
author Ravanan, R
Udayaraj, U
Ansell, D
Collett, D
Johnson, R
O’Neill, J
Tomson, C R V
Dudley, C R K
author_facet Ravanan, R
Udayaraj, U
Ansell, D
Collett, D
Johnson, R
O’Neill, J
Tomson, C R V
Dudley, C R K
author_sort Ravanan, R
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess whether equity exists in access to renal transplantation in the UK after adjustment for case mix in incident patients with end stage renal disease. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting UK Renal Registry and UK Transplant Registry. Participants All incident renal replacement treatment patients (n=16 202) from 65 renal centres submitting data to the UK Renal Registry between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005, followed until 31 December 2008 (or until transplantation or death, whichever was earliest). Outcome measures Proportion of incident dialysis patients at each renal centre who were registered on the national transplant list; time taken to achieve registration; and proportion of patients subsequently transplanted. Results We found that recipients’ age, ethnicity, and primary renal diagnosis were associated with the likelihood of accessing the waiting list or receiving a transplant. After adjustment for case mix, significant inter-centre variability existed in access to the transplant list (change in −2LogL=89.9, df=1, P<0.001), in the time taken to register patients on the waiting list (change in −2LogL=247.4, df=64, P<0.001), in receipt of a renal transplant from a donor after brain stem death (change in −2LogL=15.1, df=1, P=0.001), and in receipt of a renal transplant from a living donor or a donor after cardiac death (change in −2LogL=46.1, df=1, P<0.001). Conclusions Significant variation in access to renal transplantation exists between centres within the UK that cannot be explained by differences in case mix.
format Text
id pubmed-2907479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29074792010-07-26 Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study Ravanan, R Udayaraj, U Ansell, D Collett, D Johnson, R O’Neill, J Tomson, C R V Dudley, C R K BMJ Research Objective To assess whether equity exists in access to renal transplantation in the UK after adjustment for case mix in incident patients with end stage renal disease. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting UK Renal Registry and UK Transplant Registry. Participants All incident renal replacement treatment patients (n=16 202) from 65 renal centres submitting data to the UK Renal Registry between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2005, followed until 31 December 2008 (or until transplantation or death, whichever was earliest). Outcome measures Proportion of incident dialysis patients at each renal centre who were registered on the national transplant list; time taken to achieve registration; and proportion of patients subsequently transplanted. Results We found that recipients’ age, ethnicity, and primary renal diagnosis were associated with the likelihood of accessing the waiting list or receiving a transplant. After adjustment for case mix, significant inter-centre variability existed in access to the transplant list (change in −2LogL=89.9, df=1, P<0.001), in the time taken to register patients on the waiting list (change in −2LogL=247.4, df=64, P<0.001), in receipt of a renal transplant from a donor after brain stem death (change in −2LogL=15.1, df=1, P=0.001), and in receipt of a renal transplant from a living donor or a donor after cardiac death (change in −2LogL=46.1, df=1, P<0.001). Conclusions Significant variation in access to renal transplantation exists between centres within the UK that cannot be explained by differences in case mix. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2907479/ /pubmed/20647283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3451 Text en © Ravanan et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Ravanan, R
Udayaraj, U
Ansell, D
Collett, D
Johnson, R
O’Neill, J
Tomson, C R V
Dudley, C R K
Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study
title Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study
title_full Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study
title_fullStr Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study
title_short Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study
title_sort variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in uk: longitudinal cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3451
work_keys_str_mv AT ravananr variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy
AT udayaraju variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy
AT anselld variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy
AT collettd variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy
AT johnsonr variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy
AT oneillj variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy
AT tomsoncrv variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy
AT dudleycrk variationbetweencentresinaccesstorenaltransplantationinuklongitudinalcohortstudy