Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is a non-invasive modality widely used in urology on an outpatient basis to measure the volume and anatomical structure of the prostate. However, the prostate volume measured by TRUS often varies from test to test. The aim of this study was to determine th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyo Serk, Kim, Sung Jin, Song, Jae Mann, Kim, Kwang Jin, Chung, Hyun Chul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20664782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.7.483
_version_ 1782184119459905536
author Lee, Hyo Serk
Kim, Sung Jin
Song, Jae Mann
Kim, Kwang Jin
Chung, Hyun Chul
author_facet Lee, Hyo Serk
Kim, Sung Jin
Song, Jae Mann
Kim, Kwang Jin
Chung, Hyun Chul
author_sort Lee, Hyo Serk
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is a non-invasive modality widely used in urology on an outpatient basis to measure the volume and anatomical structure of the prostate. However, the prostate volume measured by TRUS often varies from test to test. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of the different shapes of the prostate, as shown by TRUS before and after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 103 patients who underwent TURP. TRUS was performed preoperatively, and the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Patients were classified into two groups: patients with a bilaterally enlarged transitional zone were assigned to group A, and those with a protruding retrourethral zone were assigned to group B. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in preoperative variables. However, postoperative IPSS scores were lower in group A than group B (9.87±6.15 vs. 13.18±8.07, p=0.02). With regard to postoperative IPSS scores relative to preoperative IPSS scores, both groups showed a significant decrease, but group A experienced a significantly greater decrease than group B (13.43±7.47 vs. 8.67±8.33, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a prostate protruding into the bladder have less of a decrease in their IPSS scores after TURP, compared to patients that do not have prostate protrusion, meaning that patients with protrusion experience less symptomatic relief.
format Text
id pubmed-2907498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29074982010-07-21 Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography Lee, Hyo Serk Kim, Sung Jin Song, Jae Mann Kim, Kwang Jin Chung, Hyun Chul Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is a non-invasive modality widely used in urology on an outpatient basis to measure the volume and anatomical structure of the prostate. However, the prostate volume measured by TRUS often varies from test to test. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of the different shapes of the prostate, as shown by TRUS before and after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 103 patients who underwent TURP. TRUS was performed preoperatively, and the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Patients were classified into two groups: patients with a bilaterally enlarged transitional zone were assigned to group A, and those with a protruding retrourethral zone were assigned to group B. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in preoperative variables. However, postoperative IPSS scores were lower in group A than group B (9.87±6.15 vs. 13.18±8.07, p=0.02). With regard to postoperative IPSS scores relative to preoperative IPSS scores, both groups showed a significant decrease, but group A experienced a significantly greater decrease than group B (13.43±7.47 vs. 8.67±8.33, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a prostate protruding into the bladder have less of a decrease in their IPSS scores after TURP, compared to patients that do not have prostate protrusion, meaning that patients with protrusion experience less symptomatic relief. The Korean Urological Association 2010-07 2010-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2907498/ /pubmed/20664782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.7.483 Text en Copyright © The Korean Urological Association, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Hyo Serk
Kim, Sung Jin
Song, Jae Mann
Kim, Kwang Jin
Chung, Hyun Chul
Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography
title Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography
title_full Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography
title_short Comparative Analysis of Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate according to Prostate Shape Shown by Transrectal Ultrasonography
title_sort comparative analysis of outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate according to prostate shape shown by transrectal ultrasonography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20664782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.7.483
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyoserk comparativeanalysisofoutcomesaftertransurethralresectionoftheprostateaccordingtoprostateshapeshownbytransrectalultrasonography
AT kimsungjin comparativeanalysisofoutcomesaftertransurethralresectionoftheprostateaccordingtoprostateshapeshownbytransrectalultrasonography
AT songjaemann comparativeanalysisofoutcomesaftertransurethralresectionoftheprostateaccordingtoprostateshapeshownbytransrectalultrasonography
AT kimkwangjin comparativeanalysisofoutcomesaftertransurethralresectionoftheprostateaccordingtoprostateshapeshownbytransrectalultrasonography
AT chunghyunchul comparativeanalysisofoutcomesaftertransurethralresectionoftheprostateaccordingtoprostateshapeshownbytransrectalultrasonography