Cargando…
A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method
In the European Society of Cardiology–European Society of Hypertension guidelines of the year 2007, the consequences of arterial stiffness and wave reflection on cardiovascular mortality have a major role. But the investigators claimed the poor availability of devices/methods providing easy and wide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20237499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.27 |
_version_ | 1782184120870240256 |
---|---|
author | Wassertheurer, S Kropf, J Weber, T van der Giet, M Baulmann, J Ammer, M Hametner, B Mayer, C C Eber, B Magometschnigg, D |
author_facet | Wassertheurer, S Kropf, J Weber, T van der Giet, M Baulmann, J Ammer, M Hametner, B Mayer, C C Eber, B Magometschnigg, D |
author_sort | Wassertheurer, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the European Society of Cardiology–European Society of Hypertension guidelines of the year 2007, the consequences of arterial stiffness and wave reflection on cardiovascular mortality have a major role. But the investigators claimed the poor availability of devices/methods providing easy and widely suitable measuring of arterial wall stiffness or their surrogates like augmentation index (AIx) or aortic systolic blood pressure (aSBP). The aim of this study was the validation of a novel method determining AIx and aSBP based on an oscillometric method using a common cuff (ARCSolver) against a validated tonometric system (SphygmoCor). aSBP and AIx measured with the SphygmoCor and ARCSolver method were compared for 302 subjects. The mean age was 56 years with an s.d. of 20 years. At least two iterations were performed in each session. This resulted in 749 measurements. For aSBP the mean difference was −0.1 mm Hg with an s.d. of 3.1 mm Hg. The mean difference for AIx was 1.2% with an s.d. of 7.9%. There was no significant difference in reproducibility of AIx for both methods. The variation estimate of inter- and intraobserver measurements was 6.3% for ARCSolver and 7.5% for SphygmoCor. The ARCSolver method is a novel method determining AIx and aSBP based on an oscillometric system with a cuff. The results agree with common accepted tonometric measurements. Its application is easy and for widespread use. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2907506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29075062010-08-03 A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method Wassertheurer, S Kropf, J Weber, T van der Giet, M Baulmann, J Ammer, M Hametner, B Mayer, C C Eber, B Magometschnigg, D J Hum Hypertens Original Article In the European Society of Cardiology–European Society of Hypertension guidelines of the year 2007, the consequences of arterial stiffness and wave reflection on cardiovascular mortality have a major role. But the investigators claimed the poor availability of devices/methods providing easy and widely suitable measuring of arterial wall stiffness or their surrogates like augmentation index (AIx) or aortic systolic blood pressure (aSBP). The aim of this study was the validation of a novel method determining AIx and aSBP based on an oscillometric method using a common cuff (ARCSolver) against a validated tonometric system (SphygmoCor). aSBP and AIx measured with the SphygmoCor and ARCSolver method were compared for 302 subjects. The mean age was 56 years with an s.d. of 20 years. At least two iterations were performed in each session. This resulted in 749 measurements. For aSBP the mean difference was −0.1 mm Hg with an s.d. of 3.1 mm Hg. The mean difference for AIx was 1.2% with an s.d. of 7.9%. There was no significant difference in reproducibility of AIx for both methods. The variation estimate of inter- and intraobserver measurements was 6.3% for ARCSolver and 7.5% for SphygmoCor. The ARCSolver method is a novel method determining AIx and aSBP based on an oscillometric system with a cuff. The results agree with common accepted tonometric measurements. Its application is easy and for widespread use. Nature Publishing Group 2010-08 2010-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2907506/ /pubmed/20237499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.27 Text en Copyright © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wassertheurer, S Kropf, J Weber, T van der Giet, M Baulmann, J Ammer, M Hametner, B Mayer, C C Eber, B Magometschnigg, D A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method |
title | A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method |
title_full | A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method |
title_fullStr | A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method |
title_full_unstemmed | A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method |
title_short | A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method |
title_sort | new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20237499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wassertheurers anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT kropfj anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT webert anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT vandergietm anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT baulmannj anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT ammerm anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT hametnerb anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT mayercc anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT eberb anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT magometschniggd anewoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT wassertheurers newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT kropfj newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT webert newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT vandergietm newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT baulmannj newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT ammerm newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT hametnerb newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT mayercc newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT eberb newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod AT magometschniggd newoscillometricmethodforpulsewaveanalysiscomparisonwithacommontonometricmethod |