Cargando…

Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?

BACKGROUND: Vaccinia virus strain Lister Elstree (VACV) is a test virus in the DVV/RKI guidelines as representative of the stable enveloped viruses. Since the potential risk of laboratory-acquired infections with VACV persists and since the adverse effects of vaccination with VACV are described, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabenau, Holger F, Rapp, Ingrid, Steinmann, Jochen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20573218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-185
_version_ 1782184154585104384
author Rabenau, Holger F
Rapp, Ingrid
Steinmann, Jochen
author_facet Rabenau, Holger F
Rapp, Ingrid
Steinmann, Jochen
author_sort Rabenau, Holger F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccinia virus strain Lister Elstree (VACV) is a test virus in the DVV/RKI guidelines as representative of the stable enveloped viruses. Since the potential risk of laboratory-acquired infections with VACV persists and since the adverse effects of vaccination with VACV are described, the replacement of VACV by the modified vaccinia Ankara strain (MVA) was studied by testing the activity of different chemical biocides in three German laboratories. METHODS: The inactivating properties of different chemical biocides (peracetic acid, aldehydes and alcohols) were tested in a quantitative suspension test according to the DVV/RKI guideline. All tests were performed with a protein load of 10% fetal calf serum with both viruses in parallel using different concentrations and contact times. Residual virus was determined by endpoint dilution method. RESULTS: The chemical biocides exhibited similar virucidal activity against VACV and MVA. In three cases intra-laboratory differences were determined between VACV and MVA - 40% (v/v) ethanol and 30% (v/v) isopropanol are more active against MVA, whereas MVA seems more stable than VACV when testing with 0.05% glutardialdehyde. Test accuracy across the three participating laboratories was high. Remarkably inter-laboratory differences in the reduction factor were only observed in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide valuable information for the replacement of VACV by MVA for testing chemical biocides and disinfectants. Because MVA does not replicate in humans this would eliminate the potential risk of inadvertent inoculation with vaccinia virus and disease in non-vaccinated laboratory workers.
format Text
id pubmed-2908096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29080962010-07-22 Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants? Rabenau, Holger F Rapp, Ingrid Steinmann, Jochen BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Vaccinia virus strain Lister Elstree (VACV) is a test virus in the DVV/RKI guidelines as representative of the stable enveloped viruses. Since the potential risk of laboratory-acquired infections with VACV persists and since the adverse effects of vaccination with VACV are described, the replacement of VACV by the modified vaccinia Ankara strain (MVA) was studied by testing the activity of different chemical biocides in three German laboratories. METHODS: The inactivating properties of different chemical biocides (peracetic acid, aldehydes and alcohols) were tested in a quantitative suspension test according to the DVV/RKI guideline. All tests were performed with a protein load of 10% fetal calf serum with both viruses in parallel using different concentrations and contact times. Residual virus was determined by endpoint dilution method. RESULTS: The chemical biocides exhibited similar virucidal activity against VACV and MVA. In three cases intra-laboratory differences were determined between VACV and MVA - 40% (v/v) ethanol and 30% (v/v) isopropanol are more active against MVA, whereas MVA seems more stable than VACV when testing with 0.05% glutardialdehyde. Test accuracy across the three participating laboratories was high. Remarkably inter-laboratory differences in the reduction factor were only observed in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide valuable information for the replacement of VACV by MVA for testing chemical biocides and disinfectants. Because MVA does not replicate in humans this would eliminate the potential risk of inadvertent inoculation with vaccinia virus and disease in non-vaccinated laboratory workers. BioMed Central 2010-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2908096/ /pubmed/20573218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-185 Text en Copyright ©2010 Rabenau et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rabenau, Holger F
Rapp, Ingrid
Steinmann, Jochen
Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?
title Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?
title_full Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?
title_fullStr Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?
title_full_unstemmed Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?
title_short Can vaccinia virus be replaced by MVA virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?
title_sort can vaccinia virus be replaced by mva virus for testing virucidal activity of chemical disinfectants?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20573218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-185
work_keys_str_mv AT rabenauholgerf canvacciniavirusbereplacedbymvavirusfortestingvirucidalactivityofchemicaldisinfectants
AT rappingrid canvacciniavirusbereplacedbymvavirusfortestingvirucidalactivityofchemicaldisinfectants
AT steinmannjochen canvacciniavirusbereplacedbymvavirusfortestingvirucidalactivityofchemicaldisinfectants