Cargando…

Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model

BACKGROUND: Accurate data on adherence and sexual behaviour are crucial in microbicide (and other HIV-related) research. In the absence of a “gold standard” the collection of such data relies largely on participant self-reporting. The Microbicides Development Programme has developed a mixed method/t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pool, Robert, Montgomery, Catherine M., Morar, Neetha S., Mweemba, Oliver, Ssali, Agnes, Gafos, Mitzy, Lees, Shelley, Stadler, Jonathan, Nunn, Andrew, Crook, Angela, Hayes, Richard, McCormack, Sheena
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20657774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011632
_version_ 1782184161580154880
author Pool, Robert
Montgomery, Catherine M.
Morar, Neetha S.
Mweemba, Oliver
Ssali, Agnes
Gafos, Mitzy
Lees, Shelley
Stadler, Jonathan
Nunn, Andrew
Crook, Angela
Hayes, Richard
McCormack, Sheena
author_facet Pool, Robert
Montgomery, Catherine M.
Morar, Neetha S.
Mweemba, Oliver
Ssali, Agnes
Gafos, Mitzy
Lees, Shelley
Stadler, Jonathan
Nunn, Andrew
Crook, Angela
Hayes, Richard
McCormack, Sheena
author_sort Pool, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate data on adherence and sexual behaviour are crucial in microbicide (and other HIV-related) research. In the absence of a “gold standard” the collection of such data relies largely on participant self-reporting. The Microbicides Development Programme has developed a mixed method/triangulation model for generating more accurate data on adherence and sexual behaviour. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data were collected from a random subsample of 725 women using structured case record form (CRF) interviews, coital diaries (CD) and in-depth interviews (IDI). Returned used and unused gel applicators were counted and additional data collected through focus group discussions and ethnography. The model is described in detail in a companion paper [1]. When CRF, CD and IDI are compared there is some inconsistency with regard to reporting of sexual behaviour, gel or condom use in more than half. Inaccuracies are least prevalent in the IDI and most prevalent in the CRF, where participants tend to under-report frequency of sex and gel and condom use. Women reported more sex, gel and condom use than their partners. IDI data on adherence match the applicator-return data more closely than the CRF. The main reasons for inaccuracies are participants forgetting, interviewer error, desirability bias, problems with the definition and delineation of key concepts (e.g. “sex act”). Most inaccuracies were unintentional and could be rectified during data collection. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The CRF – the main source of self-report data on behaviour and adherence in many studies – was the least accurate with regard to measuring sexual behaviour, gel and condom use. This has important implications for the use of structured questionnaires for the collection of data on sexual behaviour and adherence. Integrating in-depth interviews and triangulation into clinical trials could increase the richness and accuracy of behavioural and adherence data.
format Text
id pubmed-2908125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29081252010-07-23 Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model Pool, Robert Montgomery, Catherine M. Morar, Neetha S. Mweemba, Oliver Ssali, Agnes Gafos, Mitzy Lees, Shelley Stadler, Jonathan Nunn, Andrew Crook, Angela Hayes, Richard McCormack, Sheena PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate data on adherence and sexual behaviour are crucial in microbicide (and other HIV-related) research. In the absence of a “gold standard” the collection of such data relies largely on participant self-reporting. The Microbicides Development Programme has developed a mixed method/triangulation model for generating more accurate data on adherence and sexual behaviour. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data were collected from a random subsample of 725 women using structured case record form (CRF) interviews, coital diaries (CD) and in-depth interviews (IDI). Returned used and unused gel applicators were counted and additional data collected through focus group discussions and ethnography. The model is described in detail in a companion paper [1]. When CRF, CD and IDI are compared there is some inconsistency with regard to reporting of sexual behaviour, gel or condom use in more than half. Inaccuracies are least prevalent in the IDI and most prevalent in the CRF, where participants tend to under-report frequency of sex and gel and condom use. Women reported more sex, gel and condom use than their partners. IDI data on adherence match the applicator-return data more closely than the CRF. The main reasons for inaccuracies are participants forgetting, interviewer error, desirability bias, problems with the definition and delineation of key concepts (e.g. “sex act”). Most inaccuracies were unintentional and could be rectified during data collection. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The CRF – the main source of self-report data on behaviour and adherence in many studies – was the least accurate with regard to measuring sexual behaviour, gel and condom use. This has important implications for the use of structured questionnaires for the collection of data on sexual behaviour and adherence. Integrating in-depth interviews and triangulation into clinical trials could increase the richness and accuracy of behavioural and adherence data. Public Library of Science 2010-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2908125/ /pubmed/20657774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011632 Text en Pool et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pool, Robert
Montgomery, Catherine M.
Morar, Neetha S.
Mweemba, Oliver
Ssali, Agnes
Gafos, Mitzy
Lees, Shelley
Stadler, Jonathan
Nunn, Andrew
Crook, Angela
Hayes, Richard
McCormack, Sheena
Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model
title Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model
title_full Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model
title_fullStr Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model
title_short Assessing the Accuracy of Adherence and Sexual Behaviour Data in the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicides Trial Using a Mixed Methods and Triangulation Model
title_sort assessing the accuracy of adherence and sexual behaviour data in the mdp301 vaginal microbicides trial using a mixed methods and triangulation model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20657774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011632
work_keys_str_mv AT poolrobert assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT montgomerycatherinem assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT morarneethas assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT mweembaoliver assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT ssaliagnes assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT gafosmitzy assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT leesshelley assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT stadlerjonathan assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT nunnandrew assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT crookangela assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT hayesrichard assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel
AT mccormacksheena assessingtheaccuracyofadherenceandsexualbehaviourdatainthemdp301vaginalmicrobicidestrialusingamixedmethodsandtriangulationmodel