Cargando…

A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea

BACKGROUND: There is a legal obligation to explain the procedure and use of epidural analgesia in labor primarily due to the possibility of potential risks and associated complications. The present study details on the survey carried out to ascertain the current status of obtaining informed consent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Nan-Ju, Sim, Jiyeon, Lee, Mi Soon, Ahn, Wonsik, Han, Sun Sook, Lee, Hwa Mi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20651996
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.1.34
_version_ 1782184170152263680
author Lee, Nan-Ju
Sim, Jiyeon
Lee, Mi Soon
Ahn, Wonsik
Han, Sun Sook
Lee, Hwa Mi
author_facet Lee, Nan-Ju
Sim, Jiyeon
Lee, Mi Soon
Ahn, Wonsik
Han, Sun Sook
Lee, Hwa Mi
author_sort Lee, Nan-Ju
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a legal obligation to explain the procedure and use of epidural analgesia in labor primarily due to the possibility of potential risks and associated complications. The present study details on the survey carried out to ascertain the current status of obtaining informed consent (IC) for explaining the epidural analgesia in labor. METHODS: The present study is based on a survey through a telephone questionnaire that covered all the hospitals in Korea where the anesthesiologists' belonged to and are registered with Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. The questionnaire included questions pertaining to administration of epidural analgesia to a parturient, information on different steps of obtaining an IC, whether patient status was evaluated, when the consent was obtained, and the reasons behind, if the consent had not being given. RESULTS: A total of 1,434 respondents took part in the survey, with a response rate of 97% (1,434/1,467). One hundred seventy-four hospitals had conducted epidural analgesia on the parturient. The overall rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia during labor was 85%, of which only 13% was conducted by anesthesiologists. The rate of evaluating preoperative patient status was 74%, of which 45% was conducted by anesthesiologists. Almost all of the consent was obtained prior to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia in labor is relatively high (85%) in Korea. However, it is necessary to discuss the content of the consent and the procedure followed for obtaining IC during the rapid progress of labor.
format Text
id pubmed-2908225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29082252010-07-22 A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea Lee, Nan-Ju Sim, Jiyeon Lee, Mi Soon Ahn, Wonsik Han, Sun Sook Lee, Hwa Mi Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a legal obligation to explain the procedure and use of epidural analgesia in labor primarily due to the possibility of potential risks and associated complications. The present study details on the survey carried out to ascertain the current status of obtaining informed consent (IC) for explaining the epidural analgesia in labor. METHODS: The present study is based on a survey through a telephone questionnaire that covered all the hospitals in Korea where the anesthesiologists' belonged to and are registered with Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. The questionnaire included questions pertaining to administration of epidural analgesia to a parturient, information on different steps of obtaining an IC, whether patient status was evaluated, when the consent was obtained, and the reasons behind, if the consent had not being given. RESULTS: A total of 1,434 respondents took part in the survey, with a response rate of 97% (1,434/1,467). One hundred seventy-four hospitals had conducted epidural analgesia on the parturient. The overall rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia during labor was 85%, of which only 13% was conducted by anesthesiologists. The rate of evaluating preoperative patient status was 74%, of which 45% was conducted by anesthesiologists. Almost all of the consent was obtained prior to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia in labor is relatively high (85%) in Korea. However, it is necessary to discuss the content of the consent and the procedure followed for obtaining IC during the rapid progress of labor. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2010-07 2010-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2908225/ /pubmed/20651996 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.1.34 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Lee, Nan-Ju
Sim, Jiyeon
Lee, Mi Soon
Ahn, Wonsik
Han, Sun Sook
Lee, Hwa Mi
A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea
title A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea
title_full A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea
title_fullStr A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea
title_full_unstemmed A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea
title_short A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea
title_sort survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in korea
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20651996
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.1.34
work_keys_str_mv AT leenanju asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT simjiyeon asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT leemisoon asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT ahnwonsik asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT hansunsook asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT leehwami asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT leenanju surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT simjiyeon surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT leemisoon surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT ahnwonsik surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT hansunsook surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea
AT leehwami surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea