Cargando…
A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea
BACKGROUND: There is a legal obligation to explain the procedure and use of epidural analgesia in labor primarily due to the possibility of potential risks and associated complications. The present study details on the survey carried out to ascertain the current status of obtaining informed consent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20651996 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.1.34 |
_version_ | 1782184170152263680 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Nan-Ju Sim, Jiyeon Lee, Mi Soon Ahn, Wonsik Han, Sun Sook Lee, Hwa Mi |
author_facet | Lee, Nan-Ju Sim, Jiyeon Lee, Mi Soon Ahn, Wonsik Han, Sun Sook Lee, Hwa Mi |
author_sort | Lee, Nan-Ju |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a legal obligation to explain the procedure and use of epidural analgesia in labor primarily due to the possibility of potential risks and associated complications. The present study details on the survey carried out to ascertain the current status of obtaining informed consent (IC) for explaining the epidural analgesia in labor. METHODS: The present study is based on a survey through a telephone questionnaire that covered all the hospitals in Korea where the anesthesiologists' belonged to and are registered with Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. The questionnaire included questions pertaining to administration of epidural analgesia to a parturient, information on different steps of obtaining an IC, whether patient status was evaluated, when the consent was obtained, and the reasons behind, if the consent had not being given. RESULTS: A total of 1,434 respondents took part in the survey, with a response rate of 97% (1,434/1,467). One hundred seventy-four hospitals had conducted epidural analgesia on the parturient. The overall rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia during labor was 85%, of which only 13% was conducted by anesthesiologists. The rate of evaluating preoperative patient status was 74%, of which 45% was conducted by anesthesiologists. Almost all of the consent was obtained prior to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia in labor is relatively high (85%) in Korea. However, it is necessary to discuss the content of the consent and the procedure followed for obtaining IC during the rapid progress of labor. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2908225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29082252010-07-22 A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea Lee, Nan-Ju Sim, Jiyeon Lee, Mi Soon Ahn, Wonsik Han, Sun Sook Lee, Hwa Mi Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a legal obligation to explain the procedure and use of epidural analgesia in labor primarily due to the possibility of potential risks and associated complications. The present study details on the survey carried out to ascertain the current status of obtaining informed consent (IC) for explaining the epidural analgesia in labor. METHODS: The present study is based on a survey through a telephone questionnaire that covered all the hospitals in Korea where the anesthesiologists' belonged to and are registered with Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. The questionnaire included questions pertaining to administration of epidural analgesia to a parturient, information on different steps of obtaining an IC, whether patient status was evaluated, when the consent was obtained, and the reasons behind, if the consent had not being given. RESULTS: A total of 1,434 respondents took part in the survey, with a response rate of 97% (1,434/1,467). One hundred seventy-four hospitals had conducted epidural analgesia on the parturient. The overall rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia during labor was 85%, of which only 13% was conducted by anesthesiologists. The rate of evaluating preoperative patient status was 74%, of which 45% was conducted by anesthesiologists. Almost all of the consent was obtained prior to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of obtaining IC for epidural analgesia in labor is relatively high (85%) in Korea. However, it is necessary to discuss the content of the consent and the procedure followed for obtaining IC during the rapid progress of labor. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2010-07 2010-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2908225/ /pubmed/20651996 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.1.34 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Lee, Nan-Ju Sim, Jiyeon Lee, Mi Soon Ahn, Wonsik Han, Sun Sook Lee, Hwa Mi A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea |
title | A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea |
title_full | A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea |
title_fullStr | A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea |
title_short | A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea |
title_sort | survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in korea |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20651996 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.1.34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leenanju asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT simjiyeon asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT leemisoon asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT ahnwonsik asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT hansunsook asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT leehwami asurveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT leenanju surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT simjiyeon surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT leemisoon surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT ahnwonsik surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT hansunsook surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea AT leehwami surveyoninformedconsentprocessforepiduralanalgesiainlaborpaininkorea |