Cargando…

The between and within day variation in gross efficiency

Before the influence of divergent factors on gross efficiency (GE) [the ratio of mechanical power output (PO) to metabolic power input (PI)] can be assessed, the variation in GE between days, i.e. the test–retest reliability, and the within day variation needs to be known. Physically active males (n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noordhof, Dionne A., de Koning, Jos J., van Erp, Teun, van Keimpema, Bart, de Ridder, Daan, Otter, Ruby, Foster, Carl
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20464413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1497-4
_version_ 1782184184344739840
author Noordhof, Dionne A.
de Koning, Jos J.
van Erp, Teun
van Keimpema, Bart
de Ridder, Daan
Otter, Ruby
Foster, Carl
author_facet Noordhof, Dionne A.
de Koning, Jos J.
van Erp, Teun
van Keimpema, Bart
de Ridder, Daan
Otter, Ruby
Foster, Carl
author_sort Noordhof, Dionne A.
collection PubMed
description Before the influence of divergent factors on gross efficiency (GE) [the ratio of mechanical power output (PO) to metabolic power input (PI)] can be assessed, the variation in GE between days, i.e. the test–retest reliability, and the within day variation needs to be known. Physically active males (n = 18) performed a maximal incremental exercise test to obtain VO(2max) and PO at VO(2max) (PVO(2max)), and three experimental testing days, consisting of seven submaximal exercise bouts evenly distributed over the 24 h of the day. Each submaximal exercise bout consisted of six min cycling at 45, 55 and 65% PVO(2max), during which VO(2) and RER were measured. GE was determined from the final 3 min of each exercise intensity with: GE = (PO/PI) × 100%. PI was calculated by multiplying VO(2) with the oxygen equivalent. GE measured during the individually highest exercise intensity with RER <1.0 did not differ significantly between days (F = 2.70, p = 0.08), which resulted in lower and upper boundaries of the 95% limits of agreement of 19.6 and 20.8%, respectively, around a mean GE of 20.2%. Although there were minor within day variations in GE, differences in GE over the day were not significant (F = 0.16, p = 0.99). The measurement of GE during cycling at intensities approximating VT is apparently very robust, a change in GE of ~0.6% can be reliably detected. Lastly, GE does not display a circadian rhythm so long as the criteria of a steady-state VO(2) and RER <1.0 are applied.
format Text
id pubmed-2908447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29084472010-08-06 The between and within day variation in gross efficiency Noordhof, Dionne A. de Koning, Jos J. van Erp, Teun van Keimpema, Bart de Ridder, Daan Otter, Ruby Foster, Carl Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article Before the influence of divergent factors on gross efficiency (GE) [the ratio of mechanical power output (PO) to metabolic power input (PI)] can be assessed, the variation in GE between days, i.e. the test–retest reliability, and the within day variation needs to be known. Physically active males (n = 18) performed a maximal incremental exercise test to obtain VO(2max) and PO at VO(2max) (PVO(2max)), and three experimental testing days, consisting of seven submaximal exercise bouts evenly distributed over the 24 h of the day. Each submaximal exercise bout consisted of six min cycling at 45, 55 and 65% PVO(2max), during which VO(2) and RER were measured. GE was determined from the final 3 min of each exercise intensity with: GE = (PO/PI) × 100%. PI was calculated by multiplying VO(2) with the oxygen equivalent. GE measured during the individually highest exercise intensity with RER <1.0 did not differ significantly between days (F = 2.70, p = 0.08), which resulted in lower and upper boundaries of the 95% limits of agreement of 19.6 and 20.8%, respectively, around a mean GE of 20.2%. Although there were minor within day variations in GE, differences in GE over the day were not significant (F = 0.16, p = 0.99). The measurement of GE during cycling at intensities approximating VT is apparently very robust, a change in GE of ~0.6% can be reliably detected. Lastly, GE does not display a circadian rhythm so long as the criteria of a steady-state VO(2) and RER <1.0 are applied. Springer-Verlag 2010-05-13 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2908447/ /pubmed/20464413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1497-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Noordhof, Dionne A.
de Koning, Jos J.
van Erp, Teun
van Keimpema, Bart
de Ridder, Daan
Otter, Ruby
Foster, Carl
The between and within day variation in gross efficiency
title The between and within day variation in gross efficiency
title_full The between and within day variation in gross efficiency
title_fullStr The between and within day variation in gross efficiency
title_full_unstemmed The between and within day variation in gross efficiency
title_short The between and within day variation in gross efficiency
title_sort between and within day variation in gross efficiency
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20464413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1497-4
work_keys_str_mv AT noordhofdionnea thebetweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT dekoningjosj thebetweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT vanerpteun thebetweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT vankeimpemabart thebetweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT deridderdaan thebetweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT otterruby thebetweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT fostercarl thebetweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT noordhofdionnea betweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT dekoningjosj betweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT vanerpteun betweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT vankeimpemabart betweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT deridderdaan betweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT otterruby betweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency
AT fostercarl betweenandwithindayvariationingrossefficiency