Cargando…

Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal

In vitro plaque removal studies require biofilm models that resemble in vivo dental plaque. Here, we compare contact and non-contact removal of single and dual-species biofilms as well as of biofilms grown from human whole saliva in vitro using different biofilm models. Bacteria were adhered to a sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verkaik, Martinus J., Busscher, Henk J., Rustema-Abbing, Minie, Slomp, Anje M., Abbas, Frank, van der Mei, Henny C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19565279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0309-x
_version_ 1782184185052528640
author Verkaik, Martinus J.
Busscher, Henk J.
Rustema-Abbing, Minie
Slomp, Anje M.
Abbas, Frank
van der Mei, Henny C.
author_facet Verkaik, Martinus J.
Busscher, Henk J.
Rustema-Abbing, Minie
Slomp, Anje M.
Abbas, Frank
van der Mei, Henny C.
author_sort Verkaik, Martinus J.
collection PubMed
description In vitro plaque removal studies require biofilm models that resemble in vivo dental plaque. Here, we compare contact and non-contact removal of single and dual-species biofilms as well as of biofilms grown from human whole saliva in vitro using different biofilm models. Bacteria were adhered to a salivary pellicle for 2 h or grown after adhesion for 16 h, after which, their removal was evaluated. In a contact mode, no differences were observed between the manual, rotating, or sonic brushing; and removal was on average 39%, 84%, and 95% for Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus oralis, and Actinomyces naeslundii, respectively, and 90% and 54% for the dual- and multi-species biofilms, respectively. However, in a non-contact mode, rotating and sonic brushes still removed considerable numbers of bacteria (24–40%), while the manual brush as a control (5–11%) did not. Single A. naeslundii and dual-species (A. naeslundii and S. oralis) biofilms were more difficult to remove after 16 h growth than after 2 h adhesion (on average, 62% and 93% for 16- and 2-h-old biofilms, respectively), while in contrast, biofilms grown from whole saliva were easier to remove (97% after 16 h and 54% after 2 h of growth). Considering the strong adhesion of dual-species biofilms and their easier more reproducible growth compared with biofilms grown from whole saliva, dual-species biofilms of A. naeslundii and S. oralis are suggested to be preferred for use in mechanical plaque removal studies in vitro.
format Text
id pubmed-2908450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29084502010-08-06 Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal Verkaik, Martinus J. Busscher, Henk J. Rustema-Abbing, Minie Slomp, Anje M. Abbas, Frank van der Mei, Henny C. Clin Oral Investig Original Article In vitro plaque removal studies require biofilm models that resemble in vivo dental plaque. Here, we compare contact and non-contact removal of single and dual-species biofilms as well as of biofilms grown from human whole saliva in vitro using different biofilm models. Bacteria were adhered to a salivary pellicle for 2 h or grown after adhesion for 16 h, after which, their removal was evaluated. In a contact mode, no differences were observed between the manual, rotating, or sonic brushing; and removal was on average 39%, 84%, and 95% for Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus oralis, and Actinomyces naeslundii, respectively, and 90% and 54% for the dual- and multi-species biofilms, respectively. However, in a non-contact mode, rotating and sonic brushes still removed considerable numbers of bacteria (24–40%), while the manual brush as a control (5–11%) did not. Single A. naeslundii and dual-species (A. naeslundii and S. oralis) biofilms were more difficult to remove after 16 h growth than after 2 h adhesion (on average, 62% and 93% for 16- and 2-h-old biofilms, respectively), while in contrast, biofilms grown from whole saliva were easier to remove (97% after 16 h and 54% after 2 h of growth). Considering the strong adhesion of dual-species biofilms and their easier more reproducible growth compared with biofilms grown from whole saliva, dual-species biofilms of A. naeslundii and S. oralis are suggested to be preferred for use in mechanical plaque removal studies in vitro. Springer-Verlag 2009-06-30 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2908450/ /pubmed/19565279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0309-x Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Verkaik, Martinus J.
Busscher, Henk J.
Rustema-Abbing, Minie
Slomp, Anje M.
Abbas, Frank
van der Mei, Henny C.
Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal
title Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal
title_full Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal
title_fullStr Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal
title_full_unstemmed Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal
title_short Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal
title_sort oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19565279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0309-x
work_keys_str_mv AT verkaikmartinusj oralbiofilmmodelsformechanicalplaqueremoval
AT busscherhenkj oralbiofilmmodelsformechanicalplaqueremoval
AT rustemaabbingminie oralbiofilmmodelsformechanicalplaqueremoval
AT slompanjem oralbiofilmmodelsformechanicalplaqueremoval
AT abbasfrank oralbiofilmmodelsformechanicalplaqueremoval
AT vandermeihennyc oralbiofilmmodelsformechanicalplaqueremoval