Cargando…

Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates

The evolution of duplicate genes has been a topic of broad interest. Here, we propose that the conservation of gene family size is a good indicator of the rate of sequence evolution and some other biological properties. By comparing the human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous gene families with and wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Feng-Chi, Chen, Chiuan-Jung, Li, Wen-Hsiung, Chuang, Trees-Juen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20194423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq055
_version_ 1782184225964818432
author Chen, Feng-Chi
Chen, Chiuan-Jung
Li, Wen-Hsiung
Chuang, Trees-Juen
author_facet Chen, Feng-Chi
Chen, Chiuan-Jung
Li, Wen-Hsiung
Chuang, Trees-Juen
author_sort Chen, Feng-Chi
collection PubMed
description The evolution of duplicate genes has been a topic of broad interest. Here, we propose that the conservation of gene family size is a good indicator of the rate of sequence evolution and some other biological properties. By comparing the human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous gene families with and without family size conservation, we demonstrate that genes with family size conservation evolve more slowly than those without family size conservation. Our results further demonstrate that both family expansion and contraction events may accelerate gene evolution, resulting in elevated evolutionary rates in the genes without family size conservation. In addition, we show that the duplicate genes with family size conservation evolve significantly more slowly than those without family size conservation. Interestingly, the median evolutionary rate of singletons falls in between those of the above two types of duplicate gene families. Our results thus suggest that the controversy on whether duplicate genes evolve more slowly than singletons can be resolved when family size conservation is taken into consideration. Furthermore, we also observe that duplicate genes with family size conservation have the highest level of gene expression/expression breadth, the highest proportion of essential genes, and the lowest gene compactness, followed by singletons and then by duplicate genes without family size conservation. Such a trend accords well with our observations of evolutionary rates. Our results thus point to the importance of family size conservation in the evolution of duplicate genes.
format Text
id pubmed-2908708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29087082010-07-23 Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates Chen, Feng-Chi Chen, Chiuan-Jung Li, Wen-Hsiung Chuang, Trees-Juen Mol Biol Evol Research Articles The evolution of duplicate genes has been a topic of broad interest. Here, we propose that the conservation of gene family size is a good indicator of the rate of sequence evolution and some other biological properties. By comparing the human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous gene families with and without family size conservation, we demonstrate that genes with family size conservation evolve more slowly than those without family size conservation. Our results further demonstrate that both family expansion and contraction events may accelerate gene evolution, resulting in elevated evolutionary rates in the genes without family size conservation. In addition, we show that the duplicate genes with family size conservation evolve significantly more slowly than those without family size conservation. Interestingly, the median evolutionary rate of singletons falls in between those of the above two types of duplicate gene families. Our results thus suggest that the controversy on whether duplicate genes evolve more slowly than singletons can be resolved when family size conservation is taken into consideration. Furthermore, we also observe that duplicate genes with family size conservation have the highest level of gene expression/expression breadth, the highest proportion of essential genes, and the lowest gene compactness, followed by singletons and then by duplicate genes without family size conservation. Such a trend accords well with our observations of evolutionary rates. Our results thus point to the importance of family size conservation in the evolution of duplicate genes. Oxford University Press 2010-08 2010-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2908708/ /pubmed/20194423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq055 Text en © 2010 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Chen, Feng-Chi
Chen, Chiuan-Jung
Li, Wen-Hsiung
Chuang, Trees-Juen
Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates
title Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates
title_full Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates
title_fullStr Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates
title_full_unstemmed Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates
title_short Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates
title_sort gene family size conservation is a good indicator of evolutionary rates
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20194423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq055
work_keys_str_mv AT chenfengchi genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates
AT chenchiuanjung genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates
AT liwenhsiung genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates
AT chuangtreesjuen genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates