Cargando…
Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates
The evolution of duplicate genes has been a topic of broad interest. Here, we propose that the conservation of gene family size is a good indicator of the rate of sequence evolution and some other biological properties. By comparing the human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous gene families with and wit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20194423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq055 |
_version_ | 1782184225964818432 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Feng-Chi Chen, Chiuan-Jung Li, Wen-Hsiung Chuang, Trees-Juen |
author_facet | Chen, Feng-Chi Chen, Chiuan-Jung Li, Wen-Hsiung Chuang, Trees-Juen |
author_sort | Chen, Feng-Chi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The evolution of duplicate genes has been a topic of broad interest. Here, we propose that the conservation of gene family size is a good indicator of the rate of sequence evolution and some other biological properties. By comparing the human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous gene families with and without family size conservation, we demonstrate that genes with family size conservation evolve more slowly than those without family size conservation. Our results further demonstrate that both family expansion and contraction events may accelerate gene evolution, resulting in elevated evolutionary rates in the genes without family size conservation. In addition, we show that the duplicate genes with family size conservation evolve significantly more slowly than those without family size conservation. Interestingly, the median evolutionary rate of singletons falls in between those of the above two types of duplicate gene families. Our results thus suggest that the controversy on whether duplicate genes evolve more slowly than singletons can be resolved when family size conservation is taken into consideration. Furthermore, we also observe that duplicate genes with family size conservation have the highest level of gene expression/expression breadth, the highest proportion of essential genes, and the lowest gene compactness, followed by singletons and then by duplicate genes without family size conservation. Such a trend accords well with our observations of evolutionary rates. Our results thus point to the importance of family size conservation in the evolution of duplicate genes. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2908708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29087082010-07-23 Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates Chen, Feng-Chi Chen, Chiuan-Jung Li, Wen-Hsiung Chuang, Trees-Juen Mol Biol Evol Research Articles The evolution of duplicate genes has been a topic of broad interest. Here, we propose that the conservation of gene family size is a good indicator of the rate of sequence evolution and some other biological properties. By comparing the human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous gene families with and without family size conservation, we demonstrate that genes with family size conservation evolve more slowly than those without family size conservation. Our results further demonstrate that both family expansion and contraction events may accelerate gene evolution, resulting in elevated evolutionary rates in the genes without family size conservation. In addition, we show that the duplicate genes with family size conservation evolve significantly more slowly than those without family size conservation. Interestingly, the median evolutionary rate of singletons falls in between those of the above two types of duplicate gene families. Our results thus suggest that the controversy on whether duplicate genes evolve more slowly than singletons can be resolved when family size conservation is taken into consideration. Furthermore, we also observe that duplicate genes with family size conservation have the highest level of gene expression/expression breadth, the highest proportion of essential genes, and the lowest gene compactness, followed by singletons and then by duplicate genes without family size conservation. Such a trend accords well with our observations of evolutionary rates. Our results thus point to the importance of family size conservation in the evolution of duplicate genes. Oxford University Press 2010-08 2010-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2908708/ /pubmed/20194423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq055 Text en © 2010 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Chen, Feng-Chi Chen, Chiuan-Jung Li, Wen-Hsiung Chuang, Trees-Juen Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates |
title | Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates |
title_full | Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates |
title_fullStr | Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates |
title_short | Gene Family Size Conservation Is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates |
title_sort | gene family size conservation is a good indicator of evolutionary rates |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20194423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenfengchi genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates AT chenchiuanjung genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates AT liwenhsiung genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates AT chuangtreesjuen genefamilysizeconservationisagoodindicatorofevolutionaryrates |