Cargando…
Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation
Sacral neuromodulation is increasingly used for the treatment of voiding dysfunction, pelvic pain syndromes, and gastrointestinal disorders. While increased use of this technology has led to a greater understanding of its potential as well as its limitations, difficulty persists in identifying the p...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Current Science Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0128-2 |
_version_ | 1782184228443652096 |
---|---|
author | Baxter, Chad Kim, Ja-Hong |
author_facet | Baxter, Chad Kim, Ja-Hong |
author_sort | Baxter, Chad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sacral neuromodulation is increasingly used for the treatment of voiding dysfunction, pelvic pain syndromes, and gastrointestinal disorders. While increased use of this technology has led to a greater understanding of its potential as well as its limitations, difficulty persists in identifying the patients that will benefit most. Either of two trial stimulation techniques is performed before placement of a permanent neuromodulator: the monopolar percutaneous nerve evaluation and the tined quadripolar staged trial. The preponderance of recent literature asserts the superior sensitivity of the staged trial over percutaneous nerve evaluation. However, the techniques offer disparate advantages, and other issues, such as cost-effectiveness, remain largely unexplored. The role of sacral neuromodulation will continue to expand as physicians and patients become increasingly aware of its therapeutic potential. Widespread adoption of this clinically superior technique will most rapidly help the greatest number of patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2908747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Current Science Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29087472010-08-06 Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation Baxter, Chad Kim, Ja-Hong Curr Urol Rep Article Sacral neuromodulation is increasingly used for the treatment of voiding dysfunction, pelvic pain syndromes, and gastrointestinal disorders. While increased use of this technology has led to a greater understanding of its potential as well as its limitations, difficulty persists in identifying the patients that will benefit most. Either of two trial stimulation techniques is performed before placement of a permanent neuromodulator: the monopolar percutaneous nerve evaluation and the tined quadripolar staged trial. The preponderance of recent literature asserts the superior sensitivity of the staged trial over percutaneous nerve evaluation. However, the techniques offer disparate advantages, and other issues, such as cost-effectiveness, remain largely unexplored. The role of sacral neuromodulation will continue to expand as physicians and patients become increasingly aware of its therapeutic potential. Widespread adoption of this clinically superior technique will most rapidly help the greatest number of patients. Current Science Inc. 2010-06-10 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2908747/ /pubmed/20535593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0128-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Baxter, Chad Kim, Ja-Hong Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation |
title | Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation |
title_full | Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation |
title_fullStr | Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation |
title_short | Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation |
title_sort | contrasting the percutaneous nerve evaluation versus staged implantation in sacral neuromodulation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0128-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baxterchad contrastingthepercutaneousnerveevaluationversusstagedimplantationinsacralneuromodulation AT kimjahong contrastingthepercutaneousnerveevaluationversusstagedimplantationinsacralneuromodulation |