Cargando…

Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior approach pancreatoduodenectomy (paPD) technique is one of the many modifications of the standard Whipple procedure (sPD). The most important modification of the technique is first approach of the superior mesenteric artery, thus enabling a complete dissection of the ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumitrascu, Traian, David, Leonard, Popescu, Irinel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19418065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0499-3
_version_ 1782184230413926400
author Dumitrascu, Traian
David, Leonard
Popescu, Irinel
author_facet Dumitrascu, Traian
David, Leonard
Popescu, Irinel
author_sort Dumitrascu, Traian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior approach pancreatoduodenectomy (paPD) technique is one of the many modifications of the standard Whipple procedure (sPD). The most important modification of the technique is first approach of the superior mesenteric artery, thus enabling a complete dissection of the right side of this artery and of the portal vein, as well as a complete excision of the retroportal pancreatic lamina. The present study is a case-match one, comparing the paPD to sPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study includes two groups of patients. A first group of 21 patients with PD by posterior approach (group 1, reference group, paPD) and a second group including 21 matched patients with PD by standard approach (group 2, control group, sPD). Demographic characteristics (sex, age), intraoperative data (approach type, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, need for vascular resections and type of reconstruction, type of resection upon remnant tissue), histological diagnosis and pathology data (tumor location, TNM staging, tumor grading, tumor vascular invasion), patient outcomes (postoperative length of stay, in-hospital postoperative mortality and morbidity, survival time) were analyzed in both groups of patients and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the two groups regarding early morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospitalization, overall survival, and survival according to tumor type. However, it was noticed that there was a significant lesser mean blood loss in the pa PD group vs SPD group (P = 0.0314) and a shorter operative time in the paPD group vs sPD group (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The paPD offers an early selection of patients during the operation (in terms of local resectability, by assessing the SMA infiltration), allows an optimal exposure of arterial abnormalities (a replaced right hepatic artery from the SMA), and better detection of venous invasion. In cases with PV/SMV invasion, paPD is particularly useful allowing a “no-touch” resection with no intraportal tumor dissemination and facilitates the vascular reconstruction. In addition, the operative bleeding and time are lower in the paPD group, probably due to early ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and reduced congestion of the pancreatic head.
format Text
id pubmed-2908755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29087552010-08-06 Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study Dumitrascu, Traian David, Leonard Popescu, Irinel Langenbecks Arch Surg Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior approach pancreatoduodenectomy (paPD) technique is one of the many modifications of the standard Whipple procedure (sPD). The most important modification of the technique is first approach of the superior mesenteric artery, thus enabling a complete dissection of the right side of this artery and of the portal vein, as well as a complete excision of the retroportal pancreatic lamina. The present study is a case-match one, comparing the paPD to sPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study includes two groups of patients. A first group of 21 patients with PD by posterior approach (group 1, reference group, paPD) and a second group including 21 matched patients with PD by standard approach (group 2, control group, sPD). Demographic characteristics (sex, age), intraoperative data (approach type, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, need for vascular resections and type of reconstruction, type of resection upon remnant tissue), histological diagnosis and pathology data (tumor location, TNM staging, tumor grading, tumor vascular invasion), patient outcomes (postoperative length of stay, in-hospital postoperative mortality and morbidity, survival time) were analyzed in both groups of patients and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the two groups regarding early morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospitalization, overall survival, and survival according to tumor type. However, it was noticed that there was a significant lesser mean blood loss in the pa PD group vs SPD group (P = 0.0314) and a shorter operative time in the paPD group vs sPD group (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The paPD offers an early selection of patients during the operation (in terms of local resectability, by assessing the SMA infiltration), allows an optimal exposure of arterial abnormalities (a replaced right hepatic artery from the SMA), and better detection of venous invasion. In cases with PV/SMV invasion, paPD is particularly useful allowing a “no-touch” resection with no intraportal tumor dissemination and facilitates the vascular reconstruction. In addition, the operative bleeding and time are lower in the paPD group, probably due to early ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and reduced congestion of the pancreatic head. Springer-Verlag 2009-05-06 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2908755/ /pubmed/19418065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0499-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dumitrascu, Traian
David, Leonard
Popescu, Irinel
Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
title Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
title_full Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
title_fullStr Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
title_full_unstemmed Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
title_short Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
title_sort posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19418065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0499-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dumitrascutraian posteriorversusstandardapproachinpancreatoduodenectomyacasematchstudy
AT davidleonard posteriorversusstandardapproachinpancreatoduodenectomyacasematchstudy
AT popescuirinel posteriorversusstandardapproachinpancreatoduodenectomyacasematchstudy