Cargando…

Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?

PURPOSE: To evaluate if using the Ehlers correction factor on the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) improves its agreement with the PASCAL dynamic contour tonometer (DCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 eyes of 120 individuals were examined. Par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunvant, Pinakin, Newcomb, Robert D, Kirstein, Elliot M, Malinovsky, Victor E, Madonna, Richard J, Meetz, Richard E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2909890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20668723
_version_ 1782184320109117440
author Gunvant, Pinakin
Newcomb, Robert D
Kirstein, Elliot M
Malinovsky, Victor E
Madonna, Richard J
Meetz, Richard E
author_facet Gunvant, Pinakin
Newcomb, Robert D
Kirstein, Elliot M
Malinovsky, Victor E
Madonna, Richard J
Meetz, Richard E
author_sort Gunvant, Pinakin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate if using the Ehlers correction factor on the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) improves its agreement with the PASCAL dynamic contour tonometer (DCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 eyes of 120 individuals were examined. Participants underwent IOP measurement with both the DCT and the GAT and central corneal thickness measurement. The Ehlers correction factor was applied on the GAT IOP measurements to calculate Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP. The agreement between the DCT and GAT, and DCT and Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP was analyzed. The analyses were repeated by stratifying the data by race. RESULTS: The mean IOP of the GAT, DCT, and the Ehlers-corrected GAT was 15.30, 16.78, and 14.68 mmHg, respectively. The agreement as assessed by Bland–Altman plot for the GAT with the DCT and DCT and Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP was +4.1 to −6.9 and +4.15 to −8.25 mmHg, respectively. The results were similar even when stratifying the data by race. CONCLUSION: Using Ehlers correction factor to account for the effect of corneal parameters on the IOP measured by the GAT worsens the agreement with the DCT. This effect remains even when stratifying the data by race.
format Text
id pubmed-2909890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29098902010-07-28 Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt? Gunvant, Pinakin Newcomb, Robert D Kirstein, Elliot M Malinovsky, Victor E Madonna, Richard J Meetz, Richard E Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate if using the Ehlers correction factor on the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) improves its agreement with the PASCAL dynamic contour tonometer (DCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 eyes of 120 individuals were examined. Participants underwent IOP measurement with both the DCT and the GAT and central corneal thickness measurement. The Ehlers correction factor was applied on the GAT IOP measurements to calculate Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP. The agreement between the DCT and GAT, and DCT and Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP was analyzed. The analyses were repeated by stratifying the data by race. RESULTS: The mean IOP of the GAT, DCT, and the Ehlers-corrected GAT was 15.30, 16.78, and 14.68 mmHg, respectively. The agreement as assessed by Bland–Altman plot for the GAT with the DCT and DCT and Ehlers-corrected GAT IOP was +4.1 to −6.9 and +4.15 to −8.25 mmHg, respectively. The results were similar even when stratifying the data by race. CONCLUSION: Using Ehlers correction factor to account for the effect of corneal parameters on the IOP measured by the GAT worsens the agreement with the DCT. This effect remains even when stratifying the data by race. Dove Medical Press 2010 2010-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2909890/ /pubmed/20668723 Text en © 2010 Gunvant et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gunvant, Pinakin
Newcomb, Robert D
Kirstein, Elliot M
Malinovsky, Victor E
Madonna, Richard J
Meetz, Richard E
Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
title Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
title_full Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
title_fullStr Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
title_full_unstemmed Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
title_short Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
title_sort measuring accurate iops: does correction factor help or hurt?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2909890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20668723
work_keys_str_mv AT gunvantpinakin measuringaccurateiopsdoescorrectionfactorhelporhurt
AT newcombrobertd measuringaccurateiopsdoescorrectionfactorhelporhurt
AT kirsteinelliotm measuringaccurateiopsdoescorrectionfactorhelporhurt
AT malinovskyvictore measuringaccurateiopsdoescorrectionfactorhelporhurt
AT madonnarichardj measuringaccurateiopsdoescorrectionfactorhelporhurt
AT meetzricharde measuringaccurateiopsdoescorrectionfactorhelporhurt