Cargando…

Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA

Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase (HIV-RT) binds more stably in binary complexes with RNA–DNA versus DNA–DNA. Current results indicate that only the -2 and -4 RNA nucleotides (-1 hybridized to the 3′ recessed DNA base) are required for stable binding to RNA–DNA, and even a single RN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olimpo, Jeffrey T., DeStefano, Jeffrey J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2910049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20338878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq169
_version_ 1782184358948372480
author Olimpo, Jeffrey T.
DeStefano, Jeffrey J.
author_facet Olimpo, Jeffrey T.
DeStefano, Jeffrey J.
author_sort Olimpo, Jeffrey T.
collection PubMed
description Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase (HIV-RT) binds more stably in binary complexes with RNA–DNA versus DNA–DNA. Current results indicate that only the -2 and -4 RNA nucleotides (-1 hybridized to the 3′ recessed DNA base) are required for stable binding to RNA–DNA, and even a single RNA nucleotide conferred significantly greater stability than DNA–DNA. Replacing 2′- hydroxyls on pivotal RNA bases with 2′-O-methyls did not affect stability, indicating that interactions between hydroxyls and RT amino acids do not stabilize binding. RT’s K(d) (k(off)/k(on)) for DNA–DNA and RNA–DNA were similar, although k(off) differed almost 40-fold, suggesting a faster k(on) for DNA–DNA. Avian myeloblastosis and Moloney murine leukemia virus RTs also bound more stably to RNA–DNA, but the difference was less pronounced than with HIV-RT. We propose that the H- versus B-form structures of RNA–DNA and DNA–DNA, respectively, allow the former to conform more easily to HIV-RT’s binding cleft, leading to more stable binding. Biologically, the ability of RT to form a more stable complex on RNA–DNA may aid in degradation of RNA fragments that remain after DNA synthesis.
format Text
id pubmed-2910049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29100492010-07-27 Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA Olimpo, Jeffrey T. DeStefano, Jeffrey J. Nucleic Acids Res Nucleic Acid Enzymes Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase (HIV-RT) binds more stably in binary complexes with RNA–DNA versus DNA–DNA. Current results indicate that only the -2 and -4 RNA nucleotides (-1 hybridized to the 3′ recessed DNA base) are required for stable binding to RNA–DNA, and even a single RNA nucleotide conferred significantly greater stability than DNA–DNA. Replacing 2′- hydroxyls on pivotal RNA bases with 2′-O-methyls did not affect stability, indicating that interactions between hydroxyls and RT amino acids do not stabilize binding. RT’s K(d) (k(off)/k(on)) for DNA–DNA and RNA–DNA were similar, although k(off) differed almost 40-fold, suggesting a faster k(on) for DNA–DNA. Avian myeloblastosis and Moloney murine leukemia virus RTs also bound more stably to RNA–DNA, but the difference was less pronounced than with HIV-RT. We propose that the H- versus B-form structures of RNA–DNA and DNA–DNA, respectively, allow the former to conform more easily to HIV-RT’s binding cleft, leading to more stable binding. Biologically, the ability of RT to form a more stable complex on RNA–DNA may aid in degradation of RNA fragments that remain after DNA synthesis. Oxford University Press 2010-07 2010-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2910049/ /pubmed/20338878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq169 Text en © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nucleic Acid Enzymes
Olimpo, Jeffrey T.
DeStefano, Jeffrey J.
Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA
title Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA
title_full Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA
title_fullStr Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA
title_full_unstemmed Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA
title_short Duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of HIV-reverse transcriptase to RNA-DNA versus DNA-DNA
title_sort duplex structural differences and not 2′-hydroxyls explain the more stable binding of hiv-reverse transcriptase to rna-dna versus dna-dna
topic Nucleic Acid Enzymes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2910049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20338878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq169
work_keys_str_mv AT olimpojeffreyt duplexstructuraldifferencesandnot2hydroxylsexplainthemorestablebindingofhivreversetranscriptasetornadnaversusdnadna
AT destefanojeffreyj duplexstructuraldifferencesandnot2hydroxylsexplainthemorestablebindingofhivreversetranscriptasetornadnaversusdnadna