Cargando…
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
BACKGROUND: The quality and quantity of individuals' social relationships has been linked not only to mental health but also to both morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analytic review was conducted to determine the extent to which social relationships influence risk for mortality, w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2910600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20668659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 |
_version_ | 1782184401309794304 |
---|---|
author | Holt-Lunstad, Julianne Smith, Timothy B. Layton, J. Bradley |
author_facet | Holt-Lunstad, Julianne Smith, Timothy B. Layton, J. Bradley |
author_sort | Holt-Lunstad, Julianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quality and quantity of individuals' social relationships has been linked not only to mental health but also to both morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analytic review was conducted to determine the extent to which social relationships influence risk for mortality, which aspects of social relationships are most highly predictive, and which factors may moderate the risk. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on several participant characteristics, including cause of mortality, initial health status, and pre-existing health conditions, as well as on study characteristics, including length of follow-up and type of assessment of social relationships. RESULTS: Across 148 studies (308,849 participants), the random effects weighted average effect size was OR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.59), indicating a 50% increased likelihood of survival for participants with stronger social relationships. This finding remained consistent across age, sex, initial health status, cause of death, and follow-up period. Significant differences were found across the type of social measurement evaluated (p<0.001); the association was strongest for complex measures of social integration (OR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.23) and lowest for binary indicators of residential status (living alone versus with others) (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.44). CONCLUSIONS: The influence of social relationships on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2910600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29106002010-07-28 Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review Holt-Lunstad, Julianne Smith, Timothy B. Layton, J. Bradley PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The quality and quantity of individuals' social relationships has been linked not only to mental health but also to both morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analytic review was conducted to determine the extent to which social relationships influence risk for mortality, which aspects of social relationships are most highly predictive, and which factors may moderate the risk. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on several participant characteristics, including cause of mortality, initial health status, and pre-existing health conditions, as well as on study characteristics, including length of follow-up and type of assessment of social relationships. RESULTS: Across 148 studies (308,849 participants), the random effects weighted average effect size was OR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.59), indicating a 50% increased likelihood of survival for participants with stronger social relationships. This finding remained consistent across age, sex, initial health status, cause of death, and follow-up period. Significant differences were found across the type of social measurement evaluated (p<0.001); the association was strongest for complex measures of social integration (OR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.23) and lowest for binary indicators of residential status (living alone versus with others) (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.44). CONCLUSIONS: The influence of social relationships on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2010-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2910600/ /pubmed/20668659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 Text en Holt-Lunstad et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Holt-Lunstad, Julianne Smith, Timothy B. Layton, J. Bradley Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review |
title | Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review |
title_full | Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review |
title_fullStr | Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review |
title_short | Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review |
title_sort | social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2910600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20668659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holtlunstadjulianne socialrelationshipsandmortalityriskametaanalyticreview AT smithtimothyb socialrelationshipsandmortalityriskametaanalyticreview AT laytonjbradley socialrelationshipsandmortalityriskametaanalyticreview |