Cargando…

Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?

Fresh blood has many potential advantages over older blood, but there is no evidence that these properties translate into clinical benefit for intensive care patients. The observational multicenter study by Karam and colleagues provides some evidence suggesting that blood stored for less than 14 day...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Guidet, Bertrand
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2911714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9011
_version_ 1782184502923100160
author Guidet, Bertrand
author_facet Guidet, Bertrand
author_sort Guidet, Bertrand
collection PubMed
description Fresh blood has many potential advantages over older blood, but there is no evidence that these properties translate into clinical benefit for intensive care patients. The observational multicenter study by Karam and colleagues provides some evidence suggesting that blood stored for less than 14 days is better than older blood in terms of new organ failure and reduction in length of stay in pediatric intensive care units. Though in favor of using young blood, this study suffers from several limitations. As a consequence, it is ethical and certainly pertinent to conduct a randomized clinical trial in order to test the hypothesis that fresh blood might reduce mortality. The rationale is strong and the potential benefit of fresh blood is substantial.
format Text
id pubmed-2911714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29117142011-05-20 Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients? Guidet, Bertrand Crit Care Commentary Fresh blood has many potential advantages over older blood, but there is no evidence that these properties translate into clinical benefit for intensive care patients. The observational multicenter study by Karam and colleagues provides some evidence suggesting that blood stored for less than 14 days is better than older blood in terms of new organ failure and reduction in length of stay in pediatric intensive care units. Though in favor of using young blood, this study suffers from several limitations. As a consequence, it is ethical and certainly pertinent to conduct a randomized clinical trial in order to test the hypothesis that fresh blood might reduce mortality. The rationale is strong and the potential benefit of fresh blood is substantial. BioMed Central 2010 2010-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2911714/ /pubmed/20565831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9011 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Guidet, Bertrand
Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?
title Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?
title_full Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?
title_fullStr Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?
title_full_unstemmed Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?
title_short Should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?
title_sort should fresh blood be recommended for intensive care patients?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2911714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9011
work_keys_str_mv AT guidetbertrand shouldfreshbloodberecommendedforintensivecarepatients