Cargando…

Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units

INTRODUCTION: Candidemia raises numerous therapeutic issues for intensive care physicians. Epidemiological data that could guide the choice of initial therapy are still required. This analysis sought to compare the characteristics of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with candidemia due to non-albi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leroy, Olivier, Mira, Jean-Paul, Montravers, Philippe, Gangneux, Jean-Pierre, Lortholary, Olivier
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2911735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20507569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9033
_version_ 1782184508176465920
author Leroy, Olivier
Mira, Jean-Paul
Montravers, Philippe
Gangneux, Jean-Pierre
Lortholary, Olivier
author_facet Leroy, Olivier
Mira, Jean-Paul
Montravers, Philippe
Gangneux, Jean-Pierre
Lortholary, Olivier
author_sort Leroy, Olivier
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Candidemia raises numerous therapeutic issues for intensive care physicians. Epidemiological data that could guide the choice of initial therapy are still required. This analysis sought to compare the characteristics of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with candidemia due to non-albicans Candida species with those of ICU patients with candidemia due to Candida albicans. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter, French study was conducted from October 2005 to May 2006. Patients exhibiting candidemia developed during ICU stay and exclusively due either to one or more non-albicans Candida species or to C. albicans were selected. The data collected included patient characteristics on ICU admission and at the onset of candidemia. RESULTS: Among the 136 patients analyzed, 78 (57.4%) had candidemia caused by C. albicans. These patients had earlier onset of infection (11.1 ± 14.2 days after ICU admission vs. 17.4 ± 17.7, p = 0.02), higher severity scores on ICU admission (SOFA: 10.4 ± 4.7 vs. 8.6 ± 4.6, p = 0.03; SAPS II: 57.4 ± 22.8 vs. 48.7 ± 15.5, P = 0.015), and were less often neutropenic (2.6% vs. 12%, p = 0.04) than patients with candidemia due to non-albicans Candida species. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients infected with Candida albicans differed from patients infected with non-albicans Candida species for a few characteristics, no clinical factor appeared pertinent enough to guide the choice of empirical antifungal therapy in ICU.
format Text
id pubmed-2911735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29117352010-07-29 Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units Leroy, Olivier Mira, Jean-Paul Montravers, Philippe Gangneux, Jean-Pierre Lortholary, Olivier Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Candidemia raises numerous therapeutic issues for intensive care physicians. Epidemiological data that could guide the choice of initial therapy are still required. This analysis sought to compare the characteristics of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with candidemia due to non-albicans Candida species with those of ICU patients with candidemia due to Candida albicans. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter, French study was conducted from October 2005 to May 2006. Patients exhibiting candidemia developed during ICU stay and exclusively due either to one or more non-albicans Candida species or to C. albicans were selected. The data collected included patient characteristics on ICU admission and at the onset of candidemia. RESULTS: Among the 136 patients analyzed, 78 (57.4%) had candidemia caused by C. albicans. These patients had earlier onset of infection (11.1 ± 14.2 days after ICU admission vs. 17.4 ± 17.7, p = 0.02), higher severity scores on ICU admission (SOFA: 10.4 ± 4.7 vs. 8.6 ± 4.6, p = 0.03; SAPS II: 57.4 ± 22.8 vs. 48.7 ± 15.5, P = 0.015), and were less often neutropenic (2.6% vs. 12%, p = 0.04) than patients with candidemia due to non-albicans Candida species. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients infected with Candida albicans differed from patients infected with non-albicans Candida species for a few characteristics, no clinical factor appeared pertinent enough to guide the choice of empirical antifungal therapy in ICU. BioMed Central 2010 2010-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2911735/ /pubmed/20507569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9033 Text en Copyright ©2010 Leroy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Leroy, Olivier
Mira, Jean-Paul
Montravers, Philippe
Gangneux, Jean-Pierre
Lortholary, Olivier
Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units
title Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units
title_full Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units
title_fullStr Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units
title_short Comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in French intensive care units
title_sort comparison of albicans vs. non-albicans candidemia in french intensive care units
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2911735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20507569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9033
work_keys_str_mv AT leroyolivier comparisonofalbicansvsnonalbicanscandidemiainfrenchintensivecareunits
AT mirajeanpaul comparisonofalbicansvsnonalbicanscandidemiainfrenchintensivecareunits
AT montraversphilippe comparisonofalbicansvsnonalbicanscandidemiainfrenchintensivecareunits
AT gangneuxjeanpierre comparisonofalbicansvsnonalbicanscandidemiainfrenchintensivecareunits
AT lortholaryolivier comparisonofalbicansvsnonalbicanscandidemiainfrenchintensivecareunits