Cargando…

From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging

During language acquisition in infancy and when learning a foreign language, the segmentation of the auditory stream into words and phrases is a complex process. Intuitively, learners use “anchors” to segment the acoustic speech stream into meaningful units like words and phrases. Regularities on a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obrig, Hellmuth, Rossi, Sonja, Telkemeyer, Silke, Wartenburger, Isabell
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00013
_version_ 1782184546735751168
author Obrig, Hellmuth
Rossi, Sonja
Telkemeyer, Silke
Wartenburger, Isabell
author_facet Obrig, Hellmuth
Rossi, Sonja
Telkemeyer, Silke
Wartenburger, Isabell
author_sort Obrig, Hellmuth
collection PubMed
description During language acquisition in infancy and when learning a foreign language, the segmentation of the auditory stream into words and phrases is a complex process. Intuitively, learners use “anchors” to segment the acoustic speech stream into meaningful units like words and phrases. Regularities on a segmental (e.g., phonological) or suprasegmental (e.g., prosodic) level can provide such anchors. Regarding the neuronal processing of these two kinds of linguistic cues a left-hemispheric dominance for segmental and a right-hemispheric bias for suprasegmental information has been reported in adults. Though lateralization is common in a number of higher cognitive functions, its prominence in language may also be a key to understanding the rapid emergence of the language network in infants and the ease at which we master our language in adulthood. One question here is whether the hemispheric lateralization is driven by linguistic input per se or whether non-linguistic, especially acoustic factors, “guide” the lateralization process. Methodologically, functional magnetic resonance imaging provides unsurpassed anatomical detail for such an enquiry. However, instrumental noise, experimental constraints and interference with EEG assessment limit its applicability, pointedly in infants and also when investigating the link between auditory and linguistic processing. Optical methods have the potential to fill this gap. Here we review a number of recent studies using optical imaging to investigate hemispheric differences during segmentation and basic auditory feature analysis in language development.
format Text
id pubmed-2912026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29120262010-08-19 From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging Obrig, Hellmuth Rossi, Sonja Telkemeyer, Silke Wartenburger, Isabell Front Neuroenergetics Neuroenergetics During language acquisition in infancy and when learning a foreign language, the segmentation of the auditory stream into words and phrases is a complex process. Intuitively, learners use “anchors” to segment the acoustic speech stream into meaningful units like words and phrases. Regularities on a segmental (e.g., phonological) or suprasegmental (e.g., prosodic) level can provide such anchors. Regarding the neuronal processing of these two kinds of linguistic cues a left-hemispheric dominance for segmental and a right-hemispheric bias for suprasegmental information has been reported in adults. Though lateralization is common in a number of higher cognitive functions, its prominence in language may also be a key to understanding the rapid emergence of the language network in infants and the ease at which we master our language in adulthood. One question here is whether the hemispheric lateralization is driven by linguistic input per se or whether non-linguistic, especially acoustic factors, “guide” the lateralization process. Methodologically, functional magnetic resonance imaging provides unsurpassed anatomical detail for such an enquiry. However, instrumental noise, experimental constraints and interference with EEG assessment limit its applicability, pointedly in infants and also when investigating the link between auditory and linguistic processing. Optical methods have the potential to fill this gap. Here we review a number of recent studies using optical imaging to investigate hemispheric differences during segmentation and basic auditory feature analysis in language development. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2912026/ /pubmed/20725516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00013 Text en Copyright © 2010 Obrig, Rossi, Telkemeyer and Wartenburger. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroenergetics
Obrig, Hellmuth
Rossi, Sonja
Telkemeyer, Silke
Wartenburger, Isabell
From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging
title From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging
title_full From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging
title_fullStr From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging
title_full_unstemmed From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging
title_short From Acoustic Segmentation to Language Processing: Evidence from Optical Imaging
title_sort from acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging
topic Neuroenergetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00013
work_keys_str_mv AT obrighellmuth fromacousticsegmentationtolanguageprocessingevidencefromopticalimaging
AT rossisonja fromacousticsegmentationtolanguageprocessingevidencefromopticalimaging
AT telkemeyersilke fromacousticsegmentationtolanguageprocessingevidencefromopticalimaging
AT wartenburgerisabell fromacousticsegmentationtolanguageprocessingevidencefromopticalimaging