Cargando…
Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii
Three notable members of the Harveyi clade, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, are best known as marine pathogens of commercial and medical import. In spite of this fact, the discrimination of Harveyi clade members remains difficult due to genetic and phenotypic simila...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20686623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00100.x |
_version_ | 1782184559159279616 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Baochuan Wang, Zheng Malanoski, Anthony P O'Grady, Elizabeth A Wimpee, Charles F Vuddhakul, Varaporn Alves Jr, Nelson Thompson, Fabiano L Gomez-Gil, Bruno Vora, Gary J |
author_facet | Lin, Baochuan Wang, Zheng Malanoski, Anthony P O'Grady, Elizabeth A Wimpee, Charles F Vuddhakul, Varaporn Alves Jr, Nelson Thompson, Fabiano L Gomez-Gil, Bruno Vora, Gary J |
author_sort | Lin, Baochuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three notable members of the Harveyi clade, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, are best known as marine pathogens of commercial and medical import. In spite of this fact, the discrimination of Harveyi clade members remains difficult due to genetic and phenotypic similarities, and this has led to misidentifications and inaccurate estimations of a species' involvement in certain environments. To begin to understand the underlying genetics that complicate species level discrimination, we compared the genomes of Harveyi clade members isolated from different environments (seawater, shrimp, corals, oysters, finfish, humans) using microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and multilocus sequence analyses (MLSA). Surprisingly, we found that the only two V. harveyi strains that have had their genomes sequenced (strains BAA-1116 and HY01) have themselves been misidentified. Instead of belonging to the species harveyi, they are actually members of the species campbellii. In total, 28% of the strains tested were found to be misidentified and 42% of these appear to comprise a novel species. Taken together, our findings correct a number of species misidentifications while validating the ability of both CGH and MLSA to distinguish closely related members of the Harveyi clade. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2912166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29121662010-08-03 Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii Lin, Baochuan Wang, Zheng Malanoski, Anthony P O'Grady, Elizabeth A Wimpee, Charles F Vuddhakul, Varaporn Alves Jr, Nelson Thompson, Fabiano L Gomez-Gil, Bruno Vora, Gary J Environ Microbiol Rep Brief Reports Three notable members of the Harveyi clade, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, are best known as marine pathogens of commercial and medical import. In spite of this fact, the discrimination of Harveyi clade members remains difficult due to genetic and phenotypic similarities, and this has led to misidentifications and inaccurate estimations of a species' involvement in certain environments. To begin to understand the underlying genetics that complicate species level discrimination, we compared the genomes of Harveyi clade members isolated from different environments (seawater, shrimp, corals, oysters, finfish, humans) using microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and multilocus sequence analyses (MLSA). Surprisingly, we found that the only two V. harveyi strains that have had their genomes sequenced (strains BAA-1116 and HY01) have themselves been misidentified. Instead of belonging to the species harveyi, they are actually members of the species campbellii. In total, 28% of the strains tested were found to be misidentified and 42% of these appear to comprise a novel species. Taken together, our findings correct a number of species misidentifications while validating the ability of both CGH and MLSA to distinguish closely related members of the Harveyi clade. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2912166/ /pubmed/20686623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00100.x Text en Journal compilation © 2010 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Brief Reports Lin, Baochuan Wang, Zheng Malanoski, Anthony P O'Grady, Elizabeth A Wimpee, Charles F Vuddhakul, Varaporn Alves Jr, Nelson Thompson, Fabiano L Gomez-Gil, Bruno Vora, Gary J Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii |
title | Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii |
title_full | Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii |
title_fullStr | Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii |
title_short | Comparative genomic analyses identify the Vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains BAA-1116 and HY01 as Vibrio campbellii |
title_sort | comparative genomic analyses identify the vibrio harveyi genome sequenced strains baa-1116 and hy01 as vibrio campbellii |
topic | Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20686623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00100.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linbaochuan comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT wangzheng comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT malanoskianthonyp comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT ogradyelizabetha comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT wimpeecharlesf comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT vuddhakulvaraporn comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT alvesjrnelson comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT thompsonfabianol comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT gomezgilbruno comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii AT voragaryj comparativegenomicanalysesidentifythevibrioharveyigenomesequencedstrainsbaa1116andhy01asvibriocampbellii |