Cargando…

The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tariq, Muhammad, Motiwala, Afaq, Ali, Syed Umer, Riaz, Mehmood, Awan, Safia, Akhter, Jaweed
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-53
_version_ 1782184580323737600
author Tariq, Muhammad
Motiwala, Afaq
Ali, Syed Umer
Riaz, Mehmood
Awan, Safia
Akhter, Jaweed
author_facet Tariq, Muhammad
Motiwala, Afaq
Ali, Syed Umer
Riaz, Mehmood
Awan, Safia
Akhter, Jaweed
author_sort Tariq, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory). RESULTS: Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees.
format Text
id pubmed-2912319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29123192010-07-30 The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study Tariq, Muhammad Motiwala, Afaq Ali, Syed Umer Riaz, Mehmood Awan, Safia Akhter, Jaweed BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory). RESULTS: Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees. BioMed Central 2010-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2912319/ /pubmed/20618929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-53 Text en Copyright ©2010 Tariq et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tariq, Muhammad
Motiwala, Afaq
Ali, Syed Umer
Riaz, Mehmood
Awan, Safia
Akhter, Jaweed
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_full The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_short The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_sort learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-53
work_keys_str_mv AT tariqmuhammad thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT motiwalaafaq thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT alisyedumer thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT riazmehmood thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT awansafia thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT akhterjaweed thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT tariqmuhammad learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT motiwalaafaq learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT alisyedumer learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT riazmehmood learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT awansafia learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT akhterjaweed learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy