Cargando…
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-53 |
_version_ | 1782184580323737600 |
---|---|
author | Tariq, Muhammad Motiwala, Afaq Ali, Syed Umer Riaz, Mehmood Awan, Safia Akhter, Jaweed |
author_facet | Tariq, Muhammad Motiwala, Afaq Ali, Syed Umer Riaz, Mehmood Awan, Safia Akhter, Jaweed |
author_sort | Tariq, Muhammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory). RESULTS: Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2912319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29123192010-07-30 The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study Tariq, Muhammad Motiwala, Afaq Ali, Syed Umer Riaz, Mehmood Awan, Safia Akhter, Jaweed BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory). RESULTS: Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees. BioMed Central 2010-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2912319/ /pubmed/20618929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-53 Text en Copyright ©2010 Tariq et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tariq, Muhammad Motiwala, Afaq Ali, Syed Umer Riaz, Mehmood Awan, Safia Akhter, Jaweed The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title | The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2912319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-53 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tariqmuhammad thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT motiwalaafaq thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT alisyedumer thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT riazmehmood thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT awansafia thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT akhterjaweed thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT tariqmuhammad learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT motiwalaafaq learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT alisyedumer learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT riazmehmood learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT awansafia learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT akhterjaweed learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy |