Cargando…
A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, double blind pilot-study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the non-absorbable Optilene(® )Mesh Elastic versus the partly absorbable Ultrapro(® )Mesh for incisional hernia repair
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials with a long term follow-up (3 to 10 years) have demonstrated that mesh repair is superior to suture closure of incisional hernia with lower recurrence rates (5 to 20% versus 20 to 63%). Yet, the ideal size and material of the mesh are not defined. So far, the...
Autores principales: | Seiler, Christoph, Baumann, Petra, Kienle, Peter, Kuthe, Andreas, Kuhlgatz, Jens, Engemann, Rainer, v Frankenberg, Moritz, Knaebel, Hanns-Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-21 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair
por: Rickert, A., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Use of absorbable meshes in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair
por: Quesada, Bernabé M, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Laparoscopic giant hiatal hernia repair with absorbable mesh
por: Ardu, Massimiliano, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Repair of primary and incisional hernias using composite mesh fixed with absorbable tackers: preliminary experience of a laparoscopic approach with a newly designed mesh in 29 cases
por: Agresta, Ferdinando, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of partially-absorbable lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernia repair: multicenter randomized study
por: Lee, Seong Dae, et al.
Publicado: (2017)