Cargando…

A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

BACKGROUND: The Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) is widely used for analysis of copy number variations (CNVs) in single or multiple loci. MLPA is a versatile methodology and important tool in cancer research; it provides precise information on increased or decreased copy numbe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedersen, Kristina, Wiechec, Emilia, Madsen, Bo E, Overgaard, Jens, Hansen, Lise Lotte
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-179
_version_ 1782184705667366912
author Pedersen, Kristina
Wiechec, Emilia
Madsen, Bo E
Overgaard, Jens
Hansen, Lise Lotte
author_facet Pedersen, Kristina
Wiechec, Emilia
Madsen, Bo E
Overgaard, Jens
Hansen, Lise Lotte
author_sort Pedersen, Kristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) is widely used for analysis of copy number variations (CNVs) in single or multiple loci. MLPA is a versatile methodology and important tool in cancer research; it provides precise information on increased or decreased copy number at specific loci as opposed to loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies based upon microsatellite analysis. Pre-designed MLPA kits and software are commercially available to analyze multiple exons, genes, and genomic regions. However, an increasing demand for new gene specific assays makes it necessary to self-design new MLPA probes for which the available software may not be applicable. During evaluation of new self-designed reference probes, we encountered a number of problems, especially when applying the MLPA methodology to tumor samples. FINDINGS: DNA samples from 48 unaffected individuals and 145 breast cancer patients were used to evaluate 11 self-designed MLPA probes and determine the cut-off values for CNV, before applying the MLPA probes to normalize the target probes in a cohort of affected individuals. To test the calculation strategy, three probes were designed to cover regions in Regulator of G-protein Signaling 8 (RGS8), which we previously have identified as being affected by allelic imbalance by LOH analysis across RGS8 in the cohort comprising 145 breast tumors. Agreement between the LOH results and the results obtained by each of the three MLPA probes in RGS8 was found for 64%, 73%, and 91%, of the analyzed samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: Here, we present a straightforward method, based upon the normalization pattern in both unaffected and affected individuals, to evaluate self-designed reference probes and to calculate CNV for the MLPA assay with specific focus on the difficulties when analyzing tumor DNA.
format Text
id pubmed-2913922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29139222010-08-03 A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) Pedersen, Kristina Wiechec, Emilia Madsen, Bo E Overgaard, Jens Hansen, Lise Lotte BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: The Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) is widely used for analysis of copy number variations (CNVs) in single or multiple loci. MLPA is a versatile methodology and important tool in cancer research; it provides precise information on increased or decreased copy number at specific loci as opposed to loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies based upon microsatellite analysis. Pre-designed MLPA kits and software are commercially available to analyze multiple exons, genes, and genomic regions. However, an increasing demand for new gene specific assays makes it necessary to self-design new MLPA probes for which the available software may not be applicable. During evaluation of new self-designed reference probes, we encountered a number of problems, especially when applying the MLPA methodology to tumor samples. FINDINGS: DNA samples from 48 unaffected individuals and 145 breast cancer patients were used to evaluate 11 self-designed MLPA probes and determine the cut-off values for CNV, before applying the MLPA probes to normalize the target probes in a cohort of affected individuals. To test the calculation strategy, three probes were designed to cover regions in Regulator of G-protein Signaling 8 (RGS8), which we previously have identified as being affected by allelic imbalance by LOH analysis across RGS8 in the cohort comprising 145 breast tumors. Agreement between the LOH results and the results obtained by each of the three MLPA probes in RGS8 was found for 64%, 73%, and 91%, of the analyzed samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: Here, we present a straightforward method, based upon the normalization pattern in both unaffected and affected individuals, to evaluate self-designed reference probes and to calculate CNV for the MLPA assay with specific focus on the difficulties when analyzing tumor DNA. BioMed Central 2010-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2913922/ /pubmed/20579386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-179 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hansen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Pedersen, Kristina
Wiechec, Emilia
Madsen, Bo E
Overgaard, Jens
Hansen, Lise Lotte
A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)
title A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)
title_full A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)
title_fullStr A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)
title_full_unstemmed A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)
title_short A simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)
title_sort simple way to evaluate self-designed probes for tumor specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (mlpa)
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-179
work_keys_str_mv AT pedersenkristina asimplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT wiechecemilia asimplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT madsenboe asimplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT overgaardjens asimplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT hansenliselotte asimplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT pedersenkristina simplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT wiechecemilia simplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT madsenboe simplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT overgaardjens simplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa
AT hansenliselotte simplewaytoevaluateselfdesignedprobesfortumorspecificmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpa