Cargando…

Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study

BACKGROUND: We report on the challenges of obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) coverage for a community-based participatory research (CBPR) environmental justice project, which involved reporting biomonitoring and household exposure results to participants, and included lay participation in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Phil, Morello-Frosch, Rachel, Brody, J G, Altman, Rebecca Gasior, Rudel, Ruthann A, Senier, Laura, Pérez, Carla, Simpson, Ruth
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20637068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-39
_version_ 1782184722183487488
author Brown, Phil
Morello-Frosch, Rachel
Brody, J G
Altman, Rebecca Gasior
Rudel, Ruthann A
Senier, Laura
Pérez, Carla
Simpson, Ruth
author_facet Brown, Phil
Morello-Frosch, Rachel
Brody, J G
Altman, Rebecca Gasior
Rudel, Ruthann A
Senier, Laura
Pérez, Carla
Simpson, Ruth
author_sort Brown, Phil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We report on the challenges of obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) coverage for a community-based participatory research (CBPR) environmental justice project, which involved reporting biomonitoring and household exposure results to participants, and included lay participation in research. METHODS: We draw on our experiences guiding a multi-partner CBPR project through university and state Institutional Review Board reviews, and other CBPR colleagues' written accounts and conference presentations and discussions. We also interviewed academics involved in CBPR to learn of their challenges with Institutional Review Boards. RESULTS: We found that Institutional Review Boards are generally unfamiliar with CBPR, reluctant to oversee community partners, and resistant to ongoing researcher-participant interaction. Institutional Review Boards sometimes unintentionally violate the very principles of beneficence and justice which they are supposed to uphold. For example, some Institutional Review Boards refuse to allow report-back of individual data to participants, which contradicts the CBPR principles that guide a growing number of projects. This causes significant delays and may divert research and dissemination efforts. Our extensive education of our university Institutional Review Board convinced them to provide human subjects protection coverage for two community-based organizations in our partnership. CONCLUSIONS: IRBs and funders should develop clear, routine review guidelines that respect the unique qualities of CBPR, while researchers and community partners can educate IRB staff and board members about the objectives, ethical frameworks, and research methods of CBPR. These strategies can better protect research participants from the harm of unnecessary delays and exclusion from the research process, while facilitating the ethical communication of study results to participants and communities.
format Text
id pubmed-2914003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29140032010-08-03 Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study Brown, Phil Morello-Frosch, Rachel Brody, J G Altman, Rebecca Gasior Rudel, Ruthann A Senier, Laura Pérez, Carla Simpson, Ruth Environ Health Case Report BACKGROUND: We report on the challenges of obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) coverage for a community-based participatory research (CBPR) environmental justice project, which involved reporting biomonitoring and household exposure results to participants, and included lay participation in research. METHODS: We draw on our experiences guiding a multi-partner CBPR project through university and state Institutional Review Board reviews, and other CBPR colleagues' written accounts and conference presentations and discussions. We also interviewed academics involved in CBPR to learn of their challenges with Institutional Review Boards. RESULTS: We found that Institutional Review Boards are generally unfamiliar with CBPR, reluctant to oversee community partners, and resistant to ongoing researcher-participant interaction. Institutional Review Boards sometimes unintentionally violate the very principles of beneficence and justice which they are supposed to uphold. For example, some Institutional Review Boards refuse to allow report-back of individual data to participants, which contradicts the CBPR principles that guide a growing number of projects. This causes significant delays and may divert research and dissemination efforts. Our extensive education of our university Institutional Review Board convinced them to provide human subjects protection coverage for two community-based organizations in our partnership. CONCLUSIONS: IRBs and funders should develop clear, routine review guidelines that respect the unique qualities of CBPR, while researchers and community partners can educate IRB staff and board members about the objectives, ethical frameworks, and research methods of CBPR. These strategies can better protect research participants from the harm of unnecessary delays and exclusion from the research process, while facilitating the ethical communication of study results to participants and communities. BioMed Central 2010-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2914003/ /pubmed/20637068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-39 Text en Copyright ©2010 Brown et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Brown, Phil
Morello-Frosch, Rachel
Brody, J G
Altman, Rebecca Gasior
Rudel, Ruthann A
Senier, Laura
Pérez, Carla
Simpson, Ruth
Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study
title Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study
title_full Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study
title_fullStr Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study
title_full_unstemmed Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study
title_short Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study
title_sort institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: a case study
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20637068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-39
work_keys_str_mv AT brownphil institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy
AT morellofroschrachel institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy
AT brodyjg institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy
AT altmanrebeccagasior institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy
AT rudelruthanna institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy
AT senierlaura institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy
AT perezcarla institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy
AT simpsonruth institutionalreviewboardchallengesrelatedtocommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchonhumanexposuretoenvironmentaltoxinsacasestudy