Cargando…

Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak

BACKGROUND: During severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Toronto, outpatient clinics at SickKids Hospital were closed to prevent further disease transmission. In response, a decision was made by the neonatal neuro-developmental follow up (NNFU) clinic staff to select patients with sch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasef, Nehad, O'Brien, Karel, Wylie, Lesley, Unger, Sharon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20646293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-51
_version_ 1782184733190389760
author Nasef, Nehad
O'Brien, Karel
Wylie, Lesley
Unger, Sharon
author_facet Nasef, Nehad
O'Brien, Karel
Wylie, Lesley
Unger, Sharon
author_sort Nasef, Nehad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Toronto, outpatient clinics at SickKids Hospital were closed to prevent further disease transmission. In response, a decision was made by the neonatal neuro-developmental follow up (NNFU) clinic staff to select patients with scheduled appointments to have a mail/telephone assessment using Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) or to postpone/skip their visit. The objective of this study was to compare the developmental assessment and its outcome in two groups of NNFU clinic patients, SARS versus non-SARS, over three standard clinic appointments. METHODS: We compared the diagnostic accuracy (identification of developmental delay), and patient management (referral for therapy or communication of a new diagnosis) of the strategies used during SARS, April/May 2003, to the standard assessment methods used for patients seen in April/May 2005 (non-SARS). In all cases data were obtained for 3 patient visits: before, during and after these 2 months and were compared using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 95 patients in the SARS group and 99 non-SARS patients. The gestational age, sex, entry diagnosis and age at the clinic visit was not different between the groups. The NNFU clinic staff mailed ASQ to 27 families during SARS, 17 (63%) were returned, and 8 of the 17 were then contacted by telephone. Criteria used to identify infants at risk selected for either mailed ASQ or phone interviews were not clearly defined in the patients' charts. There was a significant under identification of developmental delay during SARS (18% versus 45%). Of those who responded to the mailed questionnaire, referrals for therapy rates were similar to non-SARS group. The lost to follow up rate was 24% for the SARS group compared with 7% for non-SARS. There was no difference in the overall rate of developmental delay in the two groups as identified at the 'after' visit. CONCLUSIONS: Poor advanced planning led to a haphazard assessment of patients during this infectious disease outbreak. Future pandemic plans should consider planning for outpatient care as well as in hospital management of patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2914048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29140482010-08-03 Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak Nasef, Nehad O'Brien, Karel Wylie, Lesley Unger, Sharon BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: During severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Toronto, outpatient clinics at SickKids Hospital were closed to prevent further disease transmission. In response, a decision was made by the neonatal neuro-developmental follow up (NNFU) clinic staff to select patients with scheduled appointments to have a mail/telephone assessment using Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) or to postpone/skip their visit. The objective of this study was to compare the developmental assessment and its outcome in two groups of NNFU clinic patients, SARS versus non-SARS, over three standard clinic appointments. METHODS: We compared the diagnostic accuracy (identification of developmental delay), and patient management (referral for therapy or communication of a new diagnosis) of the strategies used during SARS, April/May 2003, to the standard assessment methods used for patients seen in April/May 2005 (non-SARS). In all cases data were obtained for 3 patient visits: before, during and after these 2 months and were compared using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 95 patients in the SARS group and 99 non-SARS patients. The gestational age, sex, entry diagnosis and age at the clinic visit was not different between the groups. The NNFU clinic staff mailed ASQ to 27 families during SARS, 17 (63%) were returned, and 8 of the 17 were then contacted by telephone. Criteria used to identify infants at risk selected for either mailed ASQ or phone interviews were not clearly defined in the patients' charts. There was a significant under identification of developmental delay during SARS (18% versus 45%). Of those who responded to the mailed questionnaire, referrals for therapy rates were similar to non-SARS group. The lost to follow up rate was 24% for the SARS group compared with 7% for non-SARS. There was no difference in the overall rate of developmental delay in the two groups as identified at the 'after' visit. CONCLUSIONS: Poor advanced planning led to a haphazard assessment of patients during this infectious disease outbreak. Future pandemic plans should consider planning for outpatient care as well as in hospital management of patients. BioMed Central 2010-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2914048/ /pubmed/20646293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-51 Text en Copyright ©2010 Nasef et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nasef, Nehad
O'Brien, Karel
Wylie, Lesley
Unger, Sharon
Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak
title Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak
title_full Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak
title_fullStr Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak
title_full_unstemmed Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak
title_short Lessons from SARS: A retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak
title_sort lessons from sars: a retrospective study of outpatient care during an infectious disease outbreak
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20646293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-51
work_keys_str_mv AT nasefnehad lessonsfromsarsaretrospectivestudyofoutpatientcareduringaninfectiousdiseaseoutbreak
AT obrienkarel lessonsfromsarsaretrospectivestudyofoutpatientcareduringaninfectiousdiseaseoutbreak
AT wylielesley lessonsfromsarsaretrospectivestudyofoutpatientcareduringaninfectiousdiseaseoutbreak
AT ungersharon lessonsfromsarsaretrospectivestudyofoutpatientcareduringaninfectiousdiseaseoutbreak