Cargando…
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
BACKGROUND: Policy makers and others often require synthesis of knowledge in an area within six months or less. Traditional systematic reviews typically take at least 12 months to conduct. Rapid reviews streamline traditional systematic review methods in order to synthesize evidence within a shorten...
Autores principales: | Ganann, Rebecca, Ciliska, Donna, Thomas, Helen |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20642853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-56 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effectiveness of interventions to improve the health and housing status of homeless people: a rapid systematic review
por: Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Community-based interventions for enhancing access to or consumption of fruit and vegetables among five to 18-year olds: a scoping review
por: Ganann, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions for promoting evidence-informed decision-making among nurses in tertiary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Yost, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses’ Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review
por: Yost, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews
por: Featherstone, Robin M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)