Cargando…
Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography
Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a portable monitor of cerebral hemodynamics with wide clinical potential. However, in fNIRS, the vascular signal from the brain is often obscured by vascular signals present in the scalp and skull. In this paper, we evaluate two methods for improving...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00014 |
_version_ | 1782184766604312576 |
---|---|
author | Gregg, Nicholas M. White, Brian R. Zeff, Benjamin W. Berger, Andrew J. Culver, Joseph P. |
author_facet | Gregg, Nicholas M. White, Brian R. Zeff, Benjamin W. Berger, Andrew J. Culver, Joseph P. |
author_sort | Gregg, Nicholas M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a portable monitor of cerebral hemodynamics with wide clinical potential. However, in fNIRS, the vascular signal from the brain is often obscured by vascular signals present in the scalp and skull. In this paper, we evaluate two methods for improving in vivo data from adult human subjects through the use of high-density diffuse optical tomography (DOT). First, we test whether we can extend superficial regression methods (which utilize the multiple source–detector pair separations) from sparse optode arrays to application with DOT imaging arrays. In order to accomplish this goal, we modify the method to remove physiological artifacts from deeper sampling channels using an average of shallow measurements. Second, DOT provides three-dimensional image reconstructions and should explicitly separate different tissue layers. We test whether DOT's depth-sectioning can completely remove superficial physiological artifacts. Herein, we assess improvements in signal quality and reproducibility due to these methods using a well-characterized visual paradigm and our high-density DOT system. Both approaches remove noise from the data, resulting in cleaner imaging and more consistent hemodynamic responses. Additionally, the two methods act synergistically, with greater improvements when the approaches are used together. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2914577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29145772010-08-19 Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography Gregg, Nicholas M. White, Brian R. Zeff, Benjamin W. Berger, Andrew J. Culver, Joseph P. Front Neuroenergetics Neuroenergetics Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a portable monitor of cerebral hemodynamics with wide clinical potential. However, in fNIRS, the vascular signal from the brain is often obscured by vascular signals present in the scalp and skull. In this paper, we evaluate two methods for improving in vivo data from adult human subjects through the use of high-density diffuse optical tomography (DOT). First, we test whether we can extend superficial regression methods (which utilize the multiple source–detector pair separations) from sparse optode arrays to application with DOT imaging arrays. In order to accomplish this goal, we modify the method to remove physiological artifacts from deeper sampling channels using an average of shallow measurements. Second, DOT provides three-dimensional image reconstructions and should explicitly separate different tissue layers. We test whether DOT's depth-sectioning can completely remove superficial physiological artifacts. Herein, we assess improvements in signal quality and reproducibility due to these methods using a well-characterized visual paradigm and our high-density DOT system. Both approaches remove noise from the data, resulting in cleaner imaging and more consistent hemodynamic responses. Additionally, the two methods act synergistically, with greater improvements when the approaches are used together. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2914577/ /pubmed/20725524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00014 Text en Copyright © 2010 Gregg, White, Zeff, Berger and Culver. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroenergetics Gregg, Nicholas M. White, Brian R. Zeff, Benjamin W. Berger, Andrew J. Culver, Joseph P. Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography |
title | Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography |
title_full | Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography |
title_fullStr | Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography |
title_short | Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography |
title_sort | brain specificity of diffuse optical imaging: improvements from superficial signal regression and tomography |
topic | Neuroenergetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greggnicholasm brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography AT whitebrianr brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography AT zeffbenjaminw brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography AT bergerandrewj brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography AT culverjosephp brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography |