Cargando…

Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography

Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a portable monitor of cerebral hemodynamics with wide clinical potential. However, in fNIRS, the vascular signal from the brain is often obscured by vascular signals present in the scalp and skull. In this paper, we evaluate two methods for improving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregg, Nicholas M., White, Brian R., Zeff, Benjamin W., Berger, Andrew J., Culver, Joseph P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725524
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00014
_version_ 1782184766604312576
author Gregg, Nicholas M.
White, Brian R.
Zeff, Benjamin W.
Berger, Andrew J.
Culver, Joseph P.
author_facet Gregg, Nicholas M.
White, Brian R.
Zeff, Benjamin W.
Berger, Andrew J.
Culver, Joseph P.
author_sort Gregg, Nicholas M.
collection PubMed
description Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a portable monitor of cerebral hemodynamics with wide clinical potential. However, in fNIRS, the vascular signal from the brain is often obscured by vascular signals present in the scalp and skull. In this paper, we evaluate two methods for improving in vivo data from adult human subjects through the use of high-density diffuse optical tomography (DOT). First, we test whether we can extend superficial regression methods (which utilize the multiple source–detector pair separations) from sparse optode arrays to application with DOT imaging arrays. In order to accomplish this goal, we modify the method to remove physiological artifacts from deeper sampling channels using an average of shallow measurements. Second, DOT provides three-dimensional image reconstructions and should explicitly separate different tissue layers. We test whether DOT's depth-sectioning can completely remove superficial physiological artifacts. Herein, we assess improvements in signal quality and reproducibility due to these methods using a well-characterized visual paradigm and our high-density DOT system. Both approaches remove noise from the data, resulting in cleaner imaging and more consistent hemodynamic responses. Additionally, the two methods act synergistically, with greater improvements when the approaches are used together.
format Text
id pubmed-2914577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29145772010-08-19 Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography Gregg, Nicholas M. White, Brian R. Zeff, Benjamin W. Berger, Andrew J. Culver, Joseph P. Front Neuroenergetics Neuroenergetics Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a portable monitor of cerebral hemodynamics with wide clinical potential. However, in fNIRS, the vascular signal from the brain is often obscured by vascular signals present in the scalp and skull. In this paper, we evaluate two methods for improving in vivo data from adult human subjects through the use of high-density diffuse optical tomography (DOT). First, we test whether we can extend superficial regression methods (which utilize the multiple source–detector pair separations) from sparse optode arrays to application with DOT imaging arrays. In order to accomplish this goal, we modify the method to remove physiological artifacts from deeper sampling channels using an average of shallow measurements. Second, DOT provides three-dimensional image reconstructions and should explicitly separate different tissue layers. We test whether DOT's depth-sectioning can completely remove superficial physiological artifacts. Herein, we assess improvements in signal quality and reproducibility due to these methods using a well-characterized visual paradigm and our high-density DOT system. Both approaches remove noise from the data, resulting in cleaner imaging and more consistent hemodynamic responses. Additionally, the two methods act synergistically, with greater improvements when the approaches are used together. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2914577/ /pubmed/20725524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00014 Text en Copyright © 2010 Gregg, White, Zeff, Berger and Culver. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroenergetics
Gregg, Nicholas M.
White, Brian R.
Zeff, Benjamin W.
Berger, Andrew J.
Culver, Joseph P.
Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography
title Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography
title_full Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography
title_fullStr Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography
title_short Brain Specificity of Diffuse Optical Imaging: Improvements from Superficial Signal Regression and Tomography
title_sort brain specificity of diffuse optical imaging: improvements from superficial signal regression and tomography
topic Neuroenergetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725524
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00014
work_keys_str_mv AT greggnicholasm brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography
AT whitebrianr brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography
AT zeffbenjaminw brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography
AT bergerandrewj brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography
AT culverjosephp brainspecificityofdiffuseopticalimagingimprovementsfromsuperficialsignalregressionandtomography