Cargando…

A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG

How can flexible phasing be generated by a central pattern generator (CPG)? To address this question, we have extended an existing model of the leech heartbeat CPG's timing network to construct a model of the CPG core and explore how appropriate phasing is set up by parameter variation. Within...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weaver, Adam L., Roffman, Rebecca C., Norris, Brian J., Calabrese, Ronald L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00038
_version_ 1782184767585779712
author Weaver, Adam L.
Roffman, Rebecca C.
Norris, Brian J.
Calabrese, Ronald L.
author_facet Weaver, Adam L.
Roffman, Rebecca C.
Norris, Brian J.
Calabrese, Ronald L.
author_sort Weaver, Adam L.
collection PubMed
description How can flexible phasing be generated by a central pattern generator (CPG)? To address this question, we have extended an existing model of the leech heartbeat CPG's timing network to construct a model of the CPG core and explore how appropriate phasing is set up by parameter variation. Within the CPG, the phasing among premotor interneurons switches regularly between two well defined states – synchronous and peristaltic. To reproduce experimentally observed phasing, we varied the strength of inhibitory synaptic and excitatory electrical input from the timing network to follower premotor interneurons. Neither inhibitory nor electrical input alone was sufficient to produce proper phasing on both sides, but instead a balance was required. Our model suggests that the different phasing of the two sides arises because the inhibitory synapses and electrical coupling oppose one another on one side (peristaltic) and reinforce one another on the other (synchronous). Our search of parameter space defined by the strength of inhibitory synaptic and excitatory electrical input strength led to a CPG model that well approximates the experimentally observed phase relations. The strength values derived from this analysis constitute model predictions that we tested by measurements made in the living system. Further, variation of the intrinsic properties of follower interneurons showed that they too systematically influence phasing. We conclude that a combination of inhibitory synaptic and excitatory electrical input interacting with neuronal intrinsic properties can flexibly generate a variety of phase relations so that almost any phasing is possible.
format Text
id pubmed-2914584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29145842010-08-10 A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG Weaver, Adam L. Roffman, Rebecca C. Norris, Brian J. Calabrese, Ronald L. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience How can flexible phasing be generated by a central pattern generator (CPG)? To address this question, we have extended an existing model of the leech heartbeat CPG's timing network to construct a model of the CPG core and explore how appropriate phasing is set up by parameter variation. Within the CPG, the phasing among premotor interneurons switches regularly between two well defined states – synchronous and peristaltic. To reproduce experimentally observed phasing, we varied the strength of inhibitory synaptic and excitatory electrical input from the timing network to follower premotor interneurons. Neither inhibitory nor electrical input alone was sufficient to produce proper phasing on both sides, but instead a balance was required. Our model suggests that the different phasing of the two sides arises because the inhibitory synapses and electrical coupling oppose one another on one side (peristaltic) and reinforce one another on the other (synchronous). Our search of parameter space defined by the strength of inhibitory synaptic and excitatory electrical input strength led to a CPG model that well approximates the experimentally observed phase relations. The strength values derived from this analysis constitute model predictions that we tested by measurements made in the living system. Further, variation of the intrinsic properties of follower interneurons showed that they too systematically influence phasing. We conclude that a combination of inhibitory synaptic and excitatory electrical input interacting with neuronal intrinsic properties can flexibly generate a variety of phase relations so that almost any phasing is possible. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2914584/ /pubmed/20700387 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00038 Text en Copyright © 2010 Weaver, Roffman, Norris and Calabrese. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Weaver, Adam L.
Roffman, Rebecca C.
Norris, Brian J.
Calabrese, Ronald L.
A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG
title A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG
title_full A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG
title_fullStr A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG
title_full_unstemmed A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG
title_short A Role for Compromise: Synaptic Inhibition and Electrical Coupling Interact to Control Phasing in the Leech Heartbeat CPG
title_sort role for compromise: synaptic inhibition and electrical coupling interact to control phasing in the leech heartbeat cpg
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00038
work_keys_str_mv AT weaveradaml aroleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg
AT roffmanrebeccac aroleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg
AT norrisbrianj aroleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg
AT calabreseronaldl aroleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg
AT weaveradaml roleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg
AT roffmanrebeccac roleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg
AT norrisbrianj roleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg
AT calabreseronaldl roleforcompromisesynapticinhibitionandelectricalcouplinginteracttocontrolphasingintheleechheartbeatcpg