Cargando…

The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain

BACKGROUND: Current evidence supports the use of exercise-based treatment for chronic low back pain that encourages the patient to assume an active role in their recovery. Walking has been shown it to be an acceptable type of exercise with a low risk of injury. However, it is not known whether struc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonough, Suzanne M, Tully, Mark A, O'Connor, Seán R, Boyd, Adele, Kerr, Daniel P, O'Neill, Siobhán M, Delitto, Antony, Bradbury, Ian, Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Baxter, David G, Hurley, Deirdre A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20633256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-163
_version_ 1782184779534303232
author McDonough, Suzanne M
Tully, Mark A
O'Connor, Seán R
Boyd, Adele
Kerr, Daniel P
O'Neill, Siobhán M
Delitto, Antony
Bradbury, Ian
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Baxter, David G
Hurley, Deirdre A
author_facet McDonough, Suzanne M
Tully, Mark A
O'Connor, Seán R
Boyd, Adele
Kerr, Daniel P
O'Neill, Siobhán M
Delitto, Antony
Bradbury, Ian
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Baxter, David G
Hurley, Deirdre A
author_sort McDonough, Suzanne M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current evidence supports the use of exercise-based treatment for chronic low back pain that encourages the patient to assume an active role in their recovery. Walking has been shown it to be an acceptable type of exercise with a low risk of injury. However, it is not known whether structured physical activity programmes are any more effective than giving advice to remain active. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study will test the feasibility of using a pedometer-driven walking programme, as an adjunct to a standard education and advice session in participants with chronic low back pain. Fifty adult participants will be recruited via a number of different sources. Baseline outcome measures including self reported function; objective physical activity levels; fear-avoidance beliefs and health-related quality of life will be recorded. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated under strict, double blind conditions to one of two treatments groups. Participants in group A will receive a single education and advice session with a physiotherapist based on the content of the 'Back Book'. Participants in group B will receive the same education and advice session. In addition, they will also receive a graded pedometer-driven walking programme prescribed by the physiotherapist. Follow up outcomes will be recorded by the same researcher, who will remain blinded to group allocation, at eight weeks and six months post randomisation. A qualitative exploration of participants' perception of walking will also be examined by use of focus groups at the end of the intervention. As a feasibility study, treatment effects will be represented by point estimates and confidence intervals. The assessment of participant satisfaction will be tabulated, as will adherence levels and any recorded difficulties or adverse events experienced by the participants or therapists. This information will be used to modify the planned interventions to be used in a larger randomised controlled trial. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the rationale and design of a study which will test the feasibility of using a structured, pedometer-driven walking programme in participants with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ISRCTN67030896]
format Text
id pubmed-2914699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29146992010-08-04 The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain McDonough, Suzanne M Tully, Mark A O'Connor, Seán R Boyd, Adele Kerr, Daniel P O'Neill, Siobhán M Delitto, Antony Bradbury, Ian Tudor-Locke, Catrine Baxter, David G Hurley, Deirdre A BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Current evidence supports the use of exercise-based treatment for chronic low back pain that encourages the patient to assume an active role in their recovery. Walking has been shown it to be an acceptable type of exercise with a low risk of injury. However, it is not known whether structured physical activity programmes are any more effective than giving advice to remain active. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study will test the feasibility of using a pedometer-driven walking programme, as an adjunct to a standard education and advice session in participants with chronic low back pain. Fifty adult participants will be recruited via a number of different sources. Baseline outcome measures including self reported function; objective physical activity levels; fear-avoidance beliefs and health-related quality of life will be recorded. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated under strict, double blind conditions to one of two treatments groups. Participants in group A will receive a single education and advice session with a physiotherapist based on the content of the 'Back Book'. Participants in group B will receive the same education and advice session. In addition, they will also receive a graded pedometer-driven walking programme prescribed by the physiotherapist. Follow up outcomes will be recorded by the same researcher, who will remain blinded to group allocation, at eight weeks and six months post randomisation. A qualitative exploration of participants' perception of walking will also be examined by use of focus groups at the end of the intervention. As a feasibility study, treatment effects will be represented by point estimates and confidence intervals. The assessment of participant satisfaction will be tabulated, as will adherence levels and any recorded difficulties or adverse events experienced by the participants or therapists. This information will be used to modify the planned interventions to be used in a larger randomised controlled trial. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the rationale and design of a study which will test the feasibility of using a structured, pedometer-driven walking programme in participants with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ISRCTN67030896] BioMed Central 2010-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2914699/ /pubmed/20633256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-163 Text en Copyright ©2010 McDonough et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
McDonough, Suzanne M
Tully, Mark A
O'Connor, Seán R
Boyd, Adele
Kerr, Daniel P
O'Neill, Siobhán M
Delitto, Antony
Bradbury, Ian
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Baxter, David G
Hurley, Deirdre A
The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain
title The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain
title_full The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain
title_fullStr The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain
title_full_unstemmed The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain
title_short The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain
title_sort back 2 activity trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20633256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-163
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonoughsuzannem theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT tullymarka theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT oconnorseanr theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT boydadele theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT kerrdanielp theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT oneillsiobhanm theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT delittoantony theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT bradburyian theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT tudorlockecatrine theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT baxterdavidg theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT hurleydeirdrea theback2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT mcdonoughsuzannem back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT tullymarka back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT oconnorseanr back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT boydadele back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT kerrdanielp back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT oneillsiobhanm back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT delittoantony back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT bradburyian back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT tudorlockecatrine back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT baxterdavidg back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain
AT hurleydeirdrea back2activitytrialeducationandadviceversuseducationandadviceplusastructuredwalkingprogrammeforchroniclowbackpain