Cargando…

Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey

OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize treatment compliance profiles of glaucoma patients and evaluate the association with intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: A computerized device (Travalert(®)) that recorded daily instillation times and eye-drop counts was given for 3 months. Patients were decl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordmann, Jean-Philippe, Baudouin, Christophe, Renard, Jean-Paul, Denis, Philippe, Lafuma, Antoine, Laurendeau, Caroline, Jeanbat, Viviane, Berdeaux, Gilles
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20689790
_version_ 1782184965033689088
author Nordmann, Jean-Philippe
Baudouin, Christophe
Renard, Jean-Paul
Denis, Philippe
Lafuma, Antoine
Laurendeau, Caroline
Jeanbat, Viviane
Berdeaux, Gilles
author_facet Nordmann, Jean-Philippe
Baudouin, Christophe
Renard, Jean-Paul
Denis, Philippe
Lafuma, Antoine
Laurendeau, Caroline
Jeanbat, Viviane
Berdeaux, Gilles
author_sort Nordmann, Jean-Philippe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize treatment compliance profiles of glaucoma patients and evaluate the association with intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: A computerized device (Travalert(®)) that recorded daily instillation times and eye-drop counts was given for 3 months. Patients were declared compliant when at least 2 drops were instilled per day. Compliance rates were calculated for weekdays and weekends, separately, over 8 consecutive weeks. A principal components analysis (PCA) was followed by an ascendant hierarchical classification (AHC) to identify compliance groups. RESULTS: 140 patients were recruited (mean age 65.5 years; 51.8% female) of whom 83.6% had primary open-angle glaucoma with mean IOP 23.9 mmHg before Travalert(®) use. 60.7% were treated with DuoTrav(®) (travoprost timolol fixed combination) and 39.3% with travoprost. The PCA identified two axes (compliance and treatment weeks). The AHC identified 3 compliance groups: ‘high’ (56.6%, approx. 80% compliance), ‘medium’ (21.2%, approx. 50% compliance), and ‘low’ (22.1%, approx. 20% compliance). Demographics and glaucoma parameters did not predict low compliance. Final mean IOP was 16.1 mmHg, but higher in the low compliance group (17.7 mmHg, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance measurement by a medical device showed compliance rates <80% by 50% (approx.) of patients, significantly impacting IOP control. No demographic or glaucoma variable was associated with low compliance.
format Text
id pubmed-2915860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29158602010-08-04 Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey Nordmann, Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Christophe Renard, Jean-Paul Denis, Philippe Lafuma, Antoine Laurendeau, Caroline Jeanbat, Viviane Berdeaux, Gilles Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize treatment compliance profiles of glaucoma patients and evaluate the association with intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: A computerized device (Travalert(®)) that recorded daily instillation times and eye-drop counts was given for 3 months. Patients were declared compliant when at least 2 drops were instilled per day. Compliance rates were calculated for weekdays and weekends, separately, over 8 consecutive weeks. A principal components analysis (PCA) was followed by an ascendant hierarchical classification (AHC) to identify compliance groups. RESULTS: 140 patients were recruited (mean age 65.5 years; 51.8% female) of whom 83.6% had primary open-angle glaucoma with mean IOP 23.9 mmHg before Travalert(®) use. 60.7% were treated with DuoTrav(®) (travoprost timolol fixed combination) and 39.3% with travoprost. The PCA identified two axes (compliance and treatment weeks). The AHC identified 3 compliance groups: ‘high’ (56.6%, approx. 80% compliance), ‘medium’ (21.2%, approx. 50% compliance), and ‘low’ (22.1%, approx. 20% compliance). Demographics and glaucoma parameters did not predict low compliance. Final mean IOP was 16.1 mmHg, but higher in the low compliance group (17.7 mmHg, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance measurement by a medical device showed compliance rates <80% by 50% (approx.) of patients, significantly impacting IOP control. No demographic or glaucoma variable was associated with low compliance. Dove Medical Press 2010 2010-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2915860/ /pubmed/20689790 Text en © 2010 Nordmann et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nordmann, Jean-Philippe
Baudouin, Christophe
Renard, Jean-Paul
Denis, Philippe
Lafuma, Antoine
Laurendeau, Caroline
Jeanbat, Viviane
Berdeaux, Gilles
Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey
title Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey
title_full Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey
title_fullStr Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey
title_short Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey
title_sort measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20689790
work_keys_str_mv AT nordmannjeanphilippe measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey
AT baudouinchristophe measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey
AT renardjeanpaul measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey
AT denisphilippe measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey
AT lafumaantoine measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey
AT laurendeaucaroline measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey
AT jeanbatviviane measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey
AT berdeauxgilles measurementoftreatmentcomplianceusingamedicaldeviceforglaucomapatientsassociatedwithintraocularpressurecontrolasurvey