Cargando…

Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?

BACKGROUND: Despite a lower incidence of bowel cancer overall, Indigenous Australians are more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage when prognosis is poor. Bowel cancer screening is an effective means of reducing incidence and mortality from bowel cancer through early identification and promp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christou, Aliki, Katzenellenbogen, Judith M, Thompson, Sandra C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-373
_version_ 1782184977260085248
author Christou, Aliki
Katzenellenbogen, Judith M
Thompson, Sandra C
author_facet Christou, Aliki
Katzenellenbogen, Judith M
Thompson, Sandra C
author_sort Christou, Aliki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite a lower incidence of bowel cancer overall, Indigenous Australians are more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage when prognosis is poor. Bowel cancer screening is an effective means of reducing incidence and mortality from bowel cancer through early identification and prompt treatment. In 2006, Australia began rolling out a population-based National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) using the Faecal Occult Blood Test. Initial evaluation of the program revealed substantial disparities in bowel cancer screening uptake with Indigenous Australians significantly less likely to participate in screening than the non-Indigenous population. This paper critically reviews characteristics of the program which may contribute to the discrepancy in screening uptake, and includes an analysis of organisational, structural, and socio-cultural barriers that play a part in the poorer participation of Indigenous and other disadvantaged and minority groups. METHODS: A search was undertaken of peer-reviewed journal articles, government reports, and other grey literature using electronic databases and citation snowballing. Articles were critically evaluated for relevance to themes that addressed the research questions. RESULTS: The NBCSP is not reaching many Indigenous Australians in the target group, with factors contributing to sub-optimal participation including how participants are selected, the way the screening kit is distributed, the nature of the test and comprehensiveness of its contents, cultural perceptions of cancer and prevailing low levels of knowledge and awareness of bowel cancer and the importance of screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the population-based approach to implementing bowel cancer screening to the Australian population unintentionally excludes vulnerable minorities, particularly Indigenous and other culturally and linguistically diverse groups. This potentially contributes to exacerbating the already widening disparities in cancer outcomes that exist among Indigenous Australians. Modifications to the program are recommended to facilitate access and participation by Indigenous and other minority populations. Further research is also needed to understand the needs and social and cultural sensitivities of these groups around cancer screening and inform alternative approaches to bowel cancer screening.
format Text
id pubmed-2915957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29159572010-08-05 Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians? Christou, Aliki Katzenellenbogen, Judith M Thompson, Sandra C BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite a lower incidence of bowel cancer overall, Indigenous Australians are more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage when prognosis is poor. Bowel cancer screening is an effective means of reducing incidence and mortality from bowel cancer through early identification and prompt treatment. In 2006, Australia began rolling out a population-based National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) using the Faecal Occult Blood Test. Initial evaluation of the program revealed substantial disparities in bowel cancer screening uptake with Indigenous Australians significantly less likely to participate in screening than the non-Indigenous population. This paper critically reviews characteristics of the program which may contribute to the discrepancy in screening uptake, and includes an analysis of organisational, structural, and socio-cultural barriers that play a part in the poorer participation of Indigenous and other disadvantaged and minority groups. METHODS: A search was undertaken of peer-reviewed journal articles, government reports, and other grey literature using electronic databases and citation snowballing. Articles were critically evaluated for relevance to themes that addressed the research questions. RESULTS: The NBCSP is not reaching many Indigenous Australians in the target group, with factors contributing to sub-optimal participation including how participants are selected, the way the screening kit is distributed, the nature of the test and comprehensiveness of its contents, cultural perceptions of cancer and prevailing low levels of knowledge and awareness of bowel cancer and the importance of screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the population-based approach to implementing bowel cancer screening to the Australian population unintentionally excludes vulnerable minorities, particularly Indigenous and other culturally and linguistically diverse groups. This potentially contributes to exacerbating the already widening disparities in cancer outcomes that exist among Indigenous Australians. Modifications to the program are recommended to facilitate access and participation by Indigenous and other minority populations. Further research is also needed to understand the needs and social and cultural sensitivities of these groups around cancer screening and inform alternative approaches to bowel cancer screening. BioMed Central 2010-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2915957/ /pubmed/20579344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-373 Text en Copyright ©2010 Christou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christou, Aliki
Katzenellenbogen, Judith M
Thompson, Sandra C
Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
title Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
title_full Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
title_fullStr Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
title_full_unstemmed Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
title_short Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
title_sort australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous australians?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20579344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-373
work_keys_str_mv AT christoualiki australiasnationalbowelcancerscreeningprogramdoesitworkforindigenousaustralians
AT katzenellenbogenjudithm australiasnationalbowelcancerscreeningprogramdoesitworkforindigenousaustralians
AT thompsonsandrac australiasnationalbowelcancerscreeningprogramdoesitworkforindigenousaustralians