Cargando…

An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study

BACKGROUND: This paper addresses the statistical use of accessibility and availability indices and the effect of study boundaries on these measures. The measures are evaluated via an extensive simulation based on cluster models for local outlet density. We define outlet to mean either food retail st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Meter, Emily M, Lawson, Andrew B, Colabianchi, Natalie, Nichols, Michele, Hibbert, James, Porter, Dwayne E, Liese, Angela D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-40
_version_ 1782184978729140224
author Van Meter, Emily M
Lawson, Andrew B
Colabianchi, Natalie
Nichols, Michele
Hibbert, James
Porter, Dwayne E
Liese, Angela D
author_facet Van Meter, Emily M
Lawson, Andrew B
Colabianchi, Natalie
Nichols, Michele
Hibbert, James
Porter, Dwayne E
Liese, Angela D
author_sort Van Meter, Emily M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper addresses the statistical use of accessibility and availability indices and the effect of study boundaries on these measures. The measures are evaluated via an extensive simulation based on cluster models for local outlet density. We define outlet to mean either food retail store (convenience store, supermarket, gas station) or restaurant (limited service or full service restaurants). We designed a simulation whereby a cluster outlet model is assumed in a large study window and an internal subset of that window is constructed. We performed simulations on various criteria including one scenario representing an urban area with 2000 outlets as well as a non-urban area simulated with only 300 outlets. A comparison is made between estimates obtained with the full study area and estimates using only the subset area. This allows the study of the effect of edge censoring on accessibility measures. RESULTS: The results suggest that considerable bias is found at the edges of study regions in particular for accessibility measures. Edge effects are smaller for availability measures (when not smoothed) and also for short range accessibility CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that any study utilizing these measures should correct for edge effects. The use of edge correction via guard areas is recommended and the avoidance of large range distance-based accessibility measures is also proposed.
format Text
id pubmed-2915963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29159632010-08-05 An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study Van Meter, Emily M Lawson, Andrew B Colabianchi, Natalie Nichols, Michele Hibbert, James Porter, Dwayne E Liese, Angela D Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: This paper addresses the statistical use of accessibility and availability indices and the effect of study boundaries on these measures. The measures are evaluated via an extensive simulation based on cluster models for local outlet density. We define outlet to mean either food retail store (convenience store, supermarket, gas station) or restaurant (limited service or full service restaurants). We designed a simulation whereby a cluster outlet model is assumed in a large study window and an internal subset of that window is constructed. We performed simulations on various criteria including one scenario representing an urban area with 2000 outlets as well as a non-urban area simulated with only 300 outlets. A comparison is made between estimates obtained with the full study area and estimates using only the subset area. This allows the study of the effect of edge censoring on accessibility measures. RESULTS: The results suggest that considerable bias is found at the edges of study regions in particular for accessibility measures. Edge effects are smaller for availability measures (when not smoothed) and also for short range accessibility CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that any study utilizing these measures should correct for edge effects. The use of edge correction via guard areas is recommended and the avoidance of large range distance-based accessibility measures is also proposed. BioMed Central 2010-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2915963/ /pubmed/20663199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-40 Text en Copyright ©2010 Van Meter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Van Meter, Emily M
Lawson, Andrew B
Colabianchi, Natalie
Nichols, Michele
Hibbert, James
Porter, Dwayne E
Liese, Angela D
An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
title An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
title_full An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
title_fullStr An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
title_short An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
title_sort evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-40
work_keys_str_mv AT vanmeteremilym anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT lawsonandrewb anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT colabianchinatalie anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT nicholsmichele anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT hibbertjames anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT porterdwaynee anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT lieseangelad anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT vanmeteremilym evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT lawsonandrewb evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT colabianchinatalie evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT nicholsmichele evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT hibbertjames evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT porterdwaynee evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy
AT lieseangelad evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy