Cargando…
An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
BACKGROUND: This paper addresses the statistical use of accessibility and availability indices and the effect of study boundaries on these measures. The measures are evaluated via an extensive simulation based on cluster models for local outlet density. We define outlet to mean either food retail st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-40 |
_version_ | 1782184978729140224 |
---|---|
author | Van Meter, Emily M Lawson, Andrew B Colabianchi, Natalie Nichols, Michele Hibbert, James Porter, Dwayne E Liese, Angela D |
author_facet | Van Meter, Emily M Lawson, Andrew B Colabianchi, Natalie Nichols, Michele Hibbert, James Porter, Dwayne E Liese, Angela D |
author_sort | Van Meter, Emily M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper addresses the statistical use of accessibility and availability indices and the effect of study boundaries on these measures. The measures are evaluated via an extensive simulation based on cluster models for local outlet density. We define outlet to mean either food retail store (convenience store, supermarket, gas station) or restaurant (limited service or full service restaurants). We designed a simulation whereby a cluster outlet model is assumed in a large study window and an internal subset of that window is constructed. We performed simulations on various criteria including one scenario representing an urban area with 2000 outlets as well as a non-urban area simulated with only 300 outlets. A comparison is made between estimates obtained with the full study area and estimates using only the subset area. This allows the study of the effect of edge censoring on accessibility measures. RESULTS: The results suggest that considerable bias is found at the edges of study regions in particular for accessibility measures. Edge effects are smaller for availability measures (when not smoothed) and also for short range accessibility CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that any study utilizing these measures should correct for edge effects. The use of edge correction via guard areas is recommended and the avoidance of large range distance-based accessibility measures is also proposed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2915963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29159632010-08-05 An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study Van Meter, Emily M Lawson, Andrew B Colabianchi, Natalie Nichols, Michele Hibbert, James Porter, Dwayne E Liese, Angela D Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: This paper addresses the statistical use of accessibility and availability indices and the effect of study boundaries on these measures. The measures are evaluated via an extensive simulation based on cluster models for local outlet density. We define outlet to mean either food retail store (convenience store, supermarket, gas station) or restaurant (limited service or full service restaurants). We designed a simulation whereby a cluster outlet model is assumed in a large study window and an internal subset of that window is constructed. We performed simulations on various criteria including one scenario representing an urban area with 2000 outlets as well as a non-urban area simulated with only 300 outlets. A comparison is made between estimates obtained with the full study area and estimates using only the subset area. This allows the study of the effect of edge censoring on accessibility measures. RESULTS: The results suggest that considerable bias is found at the edges of study regions in particular for accessibility measures. Edge effects are smaller for availability measures (when not smoothed) and also for short range accessibility CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that any study utilizing these measures should correct for edge effects. The use of edge correction via guard areas is recommended and the avoidance of large range distance-based accessibility measures is also proposed. BioMed Central 2010-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2915963/ /pubmed/20663199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-40 Text en Copyright ©2010 Van Meter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Van Meter, Emily M Lawson, Andrew B Colabianchi, Natalie Nichols, Michele Hibbert, James Porter, Dwayne E Liese, Angela D An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study |
title | An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study |
title_full | An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study |
title_short | An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study |
title_sort | evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanmeteremilym anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT lawsonandrewb anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT colabianchinatalie anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT nicholsmichele anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT hibbertjames anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT porterdwaynee anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT lieseangelad anevaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT vanmeteremilym evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT lawsonandrewb evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT colabianchinatalie evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT nicholsmichele evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT hibbertjames evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT porterdwaynee evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy AT lieseangelad evaluationofedgeeffectsinnutritionalaccessibilityandavailabilitymeasuresasimulationstudy |