Cargando…

Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic

BACKGROUND: The A/H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic revealed that operational issues of school closure interventions, such as when school closure should be initiated (activation trigger), how long schools should be closed (duration) and what type of school closure should be adopted, varied greatly betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halder, Nilimesh, Kelso, Joel K, Milne, George J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20659348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-221
_version_ 1782184986714046464
author Halder, Nilimesh
Kelso, Joel K
Milne, George J
author_facet Halder, Nilimesh
Kelso, Joel K
Milne, George J
author_sort Halder, Nilimesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The A/H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic revealed that operational issues of school closure interventions, such as when school closure should be initiated (activation trigger), how long schools should be closed (duration) and what type of school closure should be adopted, varied greatly between and within countries. Computer simulation can be used to examine school closure intervention strategies in order to inform public health authorities as they refine school closure guidelines in light of experience with the A/H1N1 2009 pandemic. METHODS: An individual-based simulation model was used to investigate the effectiveness of school closure interventions for influenza pandemics with R(0 )of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5. The effectiveness of individual school closure and simultaneous school closure were analyzed for 2, 4 and 8 weeks closure duration, with a daily diagnosed case based intervention activation trigger scheme. The effectiveness of combining antiviral drug treatment and household prophyaxis with school closure was also investigated. RESULTS: Illness attack rate was reduced from 33% to 19% (14% reduction in overall attack rate) by 8 weeks school closure activating at 30 daily diagnosed cases in the community for an influenza pandemic with R(0 )= 1.5; when combined with antivirals a 19% (from 33% to 14%) reduction in attack rate was obtained. For R(0 )>= 2.0, school closure would be less effective. An 8 weeks school closure strategy gives 9% (from 50% to 41%) and 4% (from 59% to 55%) reduction in attack rate for R(0 )= 2.0 and 2.5 respectively; however, school closure plus antivirals would give a significant reduction (~15%) in over all attack rate. The results also suggest that an individual school closure strategy would be more effective than simultaneous school closure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the particular school closure strategy to be adopted depends both on the disease severity, which will determine the duration of school closure deemed acceptable, and its transmissibility. For epidemics with a low transmissibility (R(0 )< 2.0) and/or mild severity, individual school closures should begin once a daily community case count is exceeded. For a severe, highly transmissible epidemic (R(0 )>= 2.0), long duration school closure should begin as soon as possible and be combined with other interventions.
format Text
id pubmed-2915996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29159962010-08-05 Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic Halder, Nilimesh Kelso, Joel K Milne, George J BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The A/H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic revealed that operational issues of school closure interventions, such as when school closure should be initiated (activation trigger), how long schools should be closed (duration) and what type of school closure should be adopted, varied greatly between and within countries. Computer simulation can be used to examine school closure intervention strategies in order to inform public health authorities as they refine school closure guidelines in light of experience with the A/H1N1 2009 pandemic. METHODS: An individual-based simulation model was used to investigate the effectiveness of school closure interventions for influenza pandemics with R(0 )of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5. The effectiveness of individual school closure and simultaneous school closure were analyzed for 2, 4 and 8 weeks closure duration, with a daily diagnosed case based intervention activation trigger scheme. The effectiveness of combining antiviral drug treatment and household prophyaxis with school closure was also investigated. RESULTS: Illness attack rate was reduced from 33% to 19% (14% reduction in overall attack rate) by 8 weeks school closure activating at 30 daily diagnosed cases in the community for an influenza pandemic with R(0 )= 1.5; when combined with antivirals a 19% (from 33% to 14%) reduction in attack rate was obtained. For R(0 )>= 2.0, school closure would be less effective. An 8 weeks school closure strategy gives 9% (from 50% to 41%) and 4% (from 59% to 55%) reduction in attack rate for R(0 )= 2.0 and 2.5 respectively; however, school closure plus antivirals would give a significant reduction (~15%) in over all attack rate. The results also suggest that an individual school closure strategy would be more effective than simultaneous school closure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the particular school closure strategy to be adopted depends both on the disease severity, which will determine the duration of school closure deemed acceptable, and its transmissibility. For epidemics with a low transmissibility (R(0 )< 2.0) and/or mild severity, individual school closures should begin once a daily community case count is exceeded. For a severe, highly transmissible epidemic (R(0 )>= 2.0), long duration school closure should begin as soon as possible and be combined with other interventions. BioMed Central 2010-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2915996/ /pubmed/20659348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-221 Text en Copyright ©2010 Halder et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Halder, Nilimesh
Kelso, Joel K
Milne, George J
Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
title Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
title_full Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
title_fullStr Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
title_short Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
title_sort developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20659348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-221
work_keys_str_mv AT haldernilimesh developingguidelinesforschoolclosureinterventionstobeusedduringafutureinfluenzapandemic
AT kelsojoelk developingguidelinesforschoolclosureinterventionstobeusedduringafutureinfluenzapandemic
AT milnegeorgej developingguidelinesforschoolclosureinterventionstobeusedduringafutureinfluenzapandemic