Cargando…
The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms
BACKGROUND: Informing health care decision making may necessitate the synthesis of evidence from different study designs (e.g., randomised controlled trials, non-randomised/observational studies). Methods for synthesising different types of studies have been proposed, but their routine use requires...
Autores principales: | McCarron, C Elizabeth, Pullenayegum, Eleanor M, Thabane, Lehana, Goeree, Ron, Tarride, Jean-Eric |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2916004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-64 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bayesian Hierarchical Models Combining Different Study Types and Adjusting for Covariate Imbalances: A Simulation Study to Assess Model Performance
por: McCarron, C. Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The relative efficacy of nine osteoporosis medications for reducing the rate of fractures in post-menopausal women
por: Hopkins, Robert B, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The Reporting of Observational Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies: A Systematic Review
por: Guo, Qing, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Bayesian approach to the assessment of the population-specific risk of inhibitors in hemophilia A patients: a case study
por: Cheng, Ji, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Evaluation of health outcomes in osteoarthritis patients after total knee replacement: a two-year follow-up
por: Xie, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2010)