Cargando…

A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) with Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) performed as initial cases by a single surgeon. METHODS: Sixteen patients with corneal endothelial were enrolled. Eight patients (8 eyes) underwent DLEK a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Chan-Hui, Lee, Dong-Hoon, Chung, Eui-Sang, Chung, Tae-Young
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2916099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20714381
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.4.195
_version_ 1782184992218021888
author Yi, Chan-Hui
Lee, Dong-Hoon
Chung, Eui-Sang
Chung, Tae-Young
author_facet Yi, Chan-Hui
Lee, Dong-Hoon
Chung, Eui-Sang
Chung, Tae-Young
author_sort Yi, Chan-Hui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) with Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) performed as initial cases by a single surgeon. METHODS: Sixteen patients with corneal endothelial were enrolled. Eight patients (8 eyes) underwent DLEK and 8 patients (8 eyes) DSEK. We measured uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, corneal endothelial count, interface opacity via Schiempflug imaging, and contrast sensitivity, as well as tracked postoperative complications over the first postoperative year. RESULTS: Primary graft failure occurred in two DLEK cases and one DSEK case, all of which were excluded for further analysis. The average 12-month postoperative BCVA was 20/70 in the DLEK group and 20/50 in the DSEK group, with the difference not statistically significant. No significant differences were identified between the 2 groups in terms of mean spherical equivalent and refractive astigmatism, although individuals in the DSEK group tended toward hyperopia. The average endothelial cell count at postoperative month 12 was 1849±494 in the DLEK group and 1643±417 cells/mm(2) in the DSEK group, representing cell losses of 26.2% and 31.9%, respectively. No significant differences in endothelial cell count or endothelial cell loss were observed between groups. Early postoperative donor disc dislocation occurred in two eyes after DLEK and one eye after DSEK. Interface opacities and contrast sensitivities were similarly not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in any assessed clinical outcome were observed between individuals undergoing DLEK and DSEK, when performed as initial cases by a single surgeon.
format Text
id pubmed-2916099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29160992010-08-16 A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK Yi, Chan-Hui Lee, Dong-Hoon Chung, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) with Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) performed as initial cases by a single surgeon. METHODS: Sixteen patients with corneal endothelial were enrolled. Eight patients (8 eyes) underwent DLEK and 8 patients (8 eyes) DSEK. We measured uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, corneal endothelial count, interface opacity via Schiempflug imaging, and contrast sensitivity, as well as tracked postoperative complications over the first postoperative year. RESULTS: Primary graft failure occurred in two DLEK cases and one DSEK case, all of which were excluded for further analysis. The average 12-month postoperative BCVA was 20/70 in the DLEK group and 20/50 in the DSEK group, with the difference not statistically significant. No significant differences were identified between the 2 groups in terms of mean spherical equivalent and refractive astigmatism, although individuals in the DSEK group tended toward hyperopia. The average endothelial cell count at postoperative month 12 was 1849±494 in the DLEK group and 1643±417 cells/mm(2) in the DSEK group, representing cell losses of 26.2% and 31.9%, respectively. No significant differences in endothelial cell count or endothelial cell loss were observed between groups. Early postoperative donor disc dislocation occurred in two eyes after DLEK and one eye after DSEK. Interface opacities and contrast sensitivities were similarly not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in any assessed clinical outcome were observed between individuals undergoing DLEK and DSEK, when performed as initial cases by a single surgeon. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2010-08 2010-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2916099/ /pubmed/20714381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.4.195 Text en © 2010 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yi, Chan-Hui
Lee, Dong-Hoon
Chung, Eui-Sang
Chung, Tae-Young
A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK
title A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK
title_full A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK
title_fullStr A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK
title_short A Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK
title_sort comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty modalities: dlek vs. dsek
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2916099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20714381
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.4.195
work_keys_str_mv AT yichanhui acomparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek
AT leedonghoon acomparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek
AT chungeuisang acomparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek
AT chungtaeyoung acomparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek
AT yichanhui comparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek
AT leedonghoon comparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek
AT chungeuisang comparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek
AT chungtaeyoung comparisonofposteriorlamellarkeratoplastymodalitiesdlekvsdsek