Cargando…
Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland
Objective To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval after miscarriage in a first recorded pregnancy. Design Population based retrospective cohort study. Setting Scottish hospitals between 1981 and 2000. Participants 30 937 women who had a miscarriage in their first recorded pregnancy and subs...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20688842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3967 |
_version_ | 1782185037873020928 |
---|---|
author | Love, Eleanor R Bhattacharya, Siladitya Smith, Norman C Bhattacharya, Sohinee |
author_facet | Love, Eleanor R Bhattacharya, Siladitya Smith, Norman C Bhattacharya, Sohinee |
author_sort | Love, Eleanor R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval after miscarriage in a first recorded pregnancy. Design Population based retrospective cohort study. Setting Scottish hospitals between 1981 and 2000. Participants 30 937 women who had a miscarriage in their first recorded pregnancy and subsequently became pregnant. Main outcome measures The primary end point was miscarriage, live birth, termination, stillbirth, or ectopic pregnancy in the second pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were rates of caesarean section and preterm delivery, low birthweight infants, pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia, placental abruption, and induced labour in the second pregnancy. Results Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, those who conceived again within six months were less likely to have another miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.77), termination (0.43, 0.33 to 0.57), or ectopic pregnancy (0.48, 0.34 to 0.69). Women with an interpregnancy interval of more than 24 months were more likely to have an ectopic second pregnancy (1.97, 1.42 to 2.72) or termination (2.40, 1.91 to 3.01). Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, women who conceived again within six months and went on to have a live birth in the second pregnancy were less likely to have a caesarean section (0.90, 0.83 to 0.98), preterm delivery (0.89, 0.81 to 0.98), or infant of low birth weight (0.84, 0.71 to 0.89) but were more likely to have an induced labour (1.08, 1.02 to 1.23). Conclusions Women who conceive within six months of an initial miscarriage have the best reproductive outcomes and lowest complication rates in a subsequent pregnancy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2917004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29170042010-08-09 Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland Love, Eleanor R Bhattacharya, Siladitya Smith, Norman C Bhattacharya, Sohinee BMJ Research Objective To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval after miscarriage in a first recorded pregnancy. Design Population based retrospective cohort study. Setting Scottish hospitals between 1981 and 2000. Participants 30 937 women who had a miscarriage in their first recorded pregnancy and subsequently became pregnant. Main outcome measures The primary end point was miscarriage, live birth, termination, stillbirth, or ectopic pregnancy in the second pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were rates of caesarean section and preterm delivery, low birthweight infants, pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia, placental abruption, and induced labour in the second pregnancy. Results Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, those who conceived again within six months were less likely to have another miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.77), termination (0.43, 0.33 to 0.57), or ectopic pregnancy (0.48, 0.34 to 0.69). Women with an interpregnancy interval of more than 24 months were more likely to have an ectopic second pregnancy (1.97, 1.42 to 2.72) or termination (2.40, 1.91 to 3.01). Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, women who conceived again within six months and went on to have a live birth in the second pregnancy were less likely to have a caesarean section (0.90, 0.83 to 0.98), preterm delivery (0.89, 0.81 to 0.98), or infant of low birth weight (0.84, 0.71 to 0.89) but were more likely to have an induced labour (1.08, 1.02 to 1.23). Conclusions Women who conceive within six months of an initial miscarriage have the best reproductive outcomes and lowest complication rates in a subsequent pregnancy. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2917004/ /pubmed/20688842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3967 Text en © Love et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Love, Eleanor R Bhattacharya, Siladitya Smith, Norman C Bhattacharya, Sohinee Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland |
title | Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland |
title_full | Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland |
title_fullStr | Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland |
title_short | Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland |
title_sort | effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in scotland |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20688842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3967 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loveeleanorr effectofinterpregnancyintervalonoutcomesofpregnancyaftermiscarriageretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatisticsinscotland AT bhattacharyasiladitya effectofinterpregnancyintervalonoutcomesofpregnancyaftermiscarriageretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatisticsinscotland AT smithnormanc effectofinterpregnancyintervalonoutcomesofpregnancyaftermiscarriageretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatisticsinscotland AT bhattacharyasohinee effectofinterpregnancyintervalonoutcomesofpregnancyaftermiscarriageretrospectiveanalysisofhospitalepisodestatisticsinscotland |