Cargando…
Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests
BACKGROUND: Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The ‘phylogenetic constraints hypothesis’ states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012056 |
_version_ | 1782185061816205312 |
---|---|
author | Menge, Duncan N. L. DeNoyer, Jeanne L. Lichstein, Jeremy W. |
author_facet | Menge, Duncan N. L. DeNoyer, Jeanne L. Lichstein, Jeremy W. |
author_sort | Menge, Duncan N. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The ‘phylogenetic constraints hypothesis’ states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the ‘selective constraints hypothesis’ states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the ‘potentially N-fixing clade’ (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2917374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29173742010-08-10 Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests Menge, Duncan N. L. DeNoyer, Jeanne L. Lichstein, Jeremy W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The ‘phylogenetic constraints hypothesis’ states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the ‘selective constraints hypothesis’ states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the ‘potentially N-fixing clade’ (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon. Public Library of Science 2010-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2917374/ /pubmed/20700466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012056 Text en Menge et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Menge, Duncan N. L. DeNoyer, Jeanne L. Lichstein, Jeremy W. Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests |
title | Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests |
title_full | Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests |
title_fullStr | Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests |
title_full_unstemmed | Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests |
title_short | Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests |
title_sort | phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mengeduncannl phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests AT denoyerjeannel phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests AT lichsteinjeremyw phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests |