Cargando…

Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests

BACKGROUND: Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The ‘phylogenetic constraints hypothesis’ states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menge, Duncan N. L., DeNoyer, Jeanne L., Lichstein, Jeremy W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012056
_version_ 1782185061816205312
author Menge, Duncan N. L.
DeNoyer, Jeanne L.
Lichstein, Jeremy W.
author_facet Menge, Duncan N. L.
DeNoyer, Jeanne L.
Lichstein, Jeremy W.
author_sort Menge, Duncan N. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The ‘phylogenetic constraints hypothesis’ states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the ‘selective constraints hypothesis’ states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the ‘potentially N-fixing clade’ (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon.
format Text
id pubmed-2917374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29173742010-08-10 Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests Menge, Duncan N. L. DeNoyer, Jeanne L. Lichstein, Jeremy W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The ‘phylogenetic constraints hypothesis’ states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the ‘selective constraints hypothesis’ states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the ‘potentially N-fixing clade’ (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon. Public Library of Science 2010-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2917374/ /pubmed/20700466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012056 Text en Menge et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Menge, Duncan N. L.
DeNoyer, Jeanne L.
Lichstein, Jeremy W.
Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests
title Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests
title_full Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests
title_fullStr Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests
title_short Phylogenetic Constraints Do Not Explain the Rarity of Nitrogen-Fixing Trees in Late-Successional Temperate Forests
title_sort phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012056
work_keys_str_mv AT mengeduncannl phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests
AT denoyerjeannel phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests
AT lichsteinjeremyw phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests