Cargando…

Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing pacemaker lead perforation in the setting of chest pain and EKG changes is difficult and usually not considered unless we have awareness and high index of suspicion. This kind of clinical scenario represents one of the diagnostic challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77 year-old Ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peddi, Prashanth, Vodnala, Deepthi, Kalavakunta, Jagadeesh K, Thakur, Ranjan K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-3-13
_version_ 1782185064511045632
author Peddi, Prashanth
Vodnala, Deepthi
Kalavakunta, Jagadeesh K
Thakur, Ranjan K
author_facet Peddi, Prashanth
Vodnala, Deepthi
Kalavakunta, Jagadeesh K
Thakur, Ranjan K
author_sort Peddi, Prashanth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosing pacemaker lead perforation in the setting of chest pain and EKG changes is difficult and usually not considered unless we have awareness and high index of suspicion. This kind of clinical scenario represents one of the diagnostic challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77 year-old Caucasian female came to emergency room with left sided non-exertional chest pain radiating to her back for the past two days. A week prior to this presentation, she had a stent supported angioplasty for in-stent re-stenosis and subsequently dual chamber pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome. On physical exam she is very obese, had normal vital signs, peripheral pulses and cardio-respiratory exam. Electrocardiogram revealed new T- wave inversions in inferior and anterior leads. Initial chest X-ray, 2D-Echocardiogram and cardiac enzymes were normal. Acute coronary syndrome was considered as an initial probable diagnosis. She was anticoagulated with heparin and eptifibatide. Patient continued to have chest pain with negative cardiac biomarkers. She developed hypotension, oliguria, elevated white count, pyuria and renal failure. Because of a normal 2D-echocardiogram, cardiac etiology for shock was not suspected. After initial fluid challenge, empiric treatment for septic shock was initiated with antibiotics and vasopressors. Work up for pulmonary embolism and intra-abdominal hemorrhage was negative. Because of persistent chest pain, shock with cold & clammy extremities and elevated central venous pressure cardiogenic shock was considered and a repeat 2D-echocardiogram was done on third day of hospitalization which revealed pericardial effusion. Non-contrast CT-scan chest done to look for lead position confirmed that she had hemorrhagic pericardial effusion along with lead perforation. Patient underwent pericardial window placement along with over-sewing of atrial wall to seal the leakage point. The patient improved and was then discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSION: Lead perforation presenting with chest pain and EKG changes is often not appreciated resulting in significant delay in diagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-2917397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29173972010-08-07 Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report Peddi, Prashanth Vodnala, Deepthi Kalavakunta, Jagadeesh K Thakur, Ranjan K Int Arch Med Case Report BACKGROUND: Diagnosing pacemaker lead perforation in the setting of chest pain and EKG changes is difficult and usually not considered unless we have awareness and high index of suspicion. This kind of clinical scenario represents one of the diagnostic challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77 year-old Caucasian female came to emergency room with left sided non-exertional chest pain radiating to her back for the past two days. A week prior to this presentation, she had a stent supported angioplasty for in-stent re-stenosis and subsequently dual chamber pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome. On physical exam she is very obese, had normal vital signs, peripheral pulses and cardio-respiratory exam. Electrocardiogram revealed new T- wave inversions in inferior and anterior leads. Initial chest X-ray, 2D-Echocardiogram and cardiac enzymes were normal. Acute coronary syndrome was considered as an initial probable diagnosis. She was anticoagulated with heparin and eptifibatide. Patient continued to have chest pain with negative cardiac biomarkers. She developed hypotension, oliguria, elevated white count, pyuria and renal failure. Because of a normal 2D-echocardiogram, cardiac etiology for shock was not suspected. After initial fluid challenge, empiric treatment for septic shock was initiated with antibiotics and vasopressors. Work up for pulmonary embolism and intra-abdominal hemorrhage was negative. Because of persistent chest pain, shock with cold & clammy extremities and elevated central venous pressure cardiogenic shock was considered and a repeat 2D-echocardiogram was done on third day of hospitalization which revealed pericardial effusion. Non-contrast CT-scan chest done to look for lead position confirmed that she had hemorrhagic pericardial effusion along with lead perforation. Patient underwent pericardial window placement along with over-sewing of atrial wall to seal the leakage point. The patient improved and was then discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSION: Lead perforation presenting with chest pain and EKG changes is often not appreciated resulting in significant delay in diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. BioMed Central 2010-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2917397/ /pubmed/20602800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-3-13 Text en Copyright ©2010 Peddi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Peddi, Prashanth
Vodnala, Deepthi
Kalavakunta, Jagadeesh K
Thakur, Ranjan K
Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report
title Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report
title_full Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report
title_fullStr Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report
title_short Acute chest pain: Acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: A case report
title_sort acute chest pain: acute coronary syndrome versus lead perforation: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-3-13
work_keys_str_mv AT peddiprashanth acutechestpainacutecoronarysyndromeversusleadperforationacasereport
AT vodnaladeepthi acutechestpainacutecoronarysyndromeversusleadperforationacasereport
AT kalavakuntajagadeeshk acutechestpainacutecoronarysyndromeversusleadperforationacasereport
AT thakurranjank acutechestpainacutecoronarysyndromeversusleadperforationacasereport