Cargando…

Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A metallic inlay implant (HemiCAP) with 15 offset sizes has been developed for the treatment of localized osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome. The aim of this study was to test the following hypotheses: (1) a matching offset size is available for each talus, (2) th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Bergen, Christiaan J A, Zengerink, Maartje, Blankevoort, Leendert, van Sterkenburg, Maayke N, van Oldenrijk, Jakob, van Dijk, C Niek
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20515434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.492764
_version_ 1782185084380512256
author van Bergen, Christiaan J A
Zengerink, Maartje
Blankevoort, Leendert
van Sterkenburg, Maayke N
van Oldenrijk, Jakob
van Dijk, C Niek
author_facet van Bergen, Christiaan J A
Zengerink, Maartje
Blankevoort, Leendert
van Sterkenburg, Maayke N
van Oldenrijk, Jakob
van Dijk, C Niek
author_sort van Bergen, Christiaan J A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A metallic inlay implant (HemiCAP) with 15 offset sizes has been developed for the treatment of localized osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome. The aim of this study was to test the following hypotheses: (1) a matching offset size is available for each talus, (2) the prosthetic device can be reproducibly implanted slightly recessed in relation to the talar cartilage level, and (3) with this implantation level, excessive contact pressures on the opposite tibial cartilage are avoided. METHODS: The prosthetic device was implanted in 11 intact fresh-frozen human cadaver ankles, aiming its surface 0.5 mm below cartilage level. The implantation level was measured at 4 margins of each implant. Intraarticular contact pressures were measured before and after implantation, with compressive forces of 1,000–2,000 N and the ankle joint in plantigrade position, 10° dorsiflexion, and 14° plantar flexion. RESULTS: There was a matching offset size available for each specimen. The mean implantation level was 0.45 (SD 0.18) mm below the cartilage surface. The defect area accounted for a median of 3% (0.02–18) of the total ankle contact pressure before implantation. This was reduced to 0.1% (0.02–13) after prosthetic implantation. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that the implant can be applied clinically in a safe way, with appropriate offset sizes for various talar domes and without excessive pressure on the opposite cartilage.
format Text
id pubmed-2917574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29175742010-09-03 Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study van Bergen, Christiaan J A Zengerink, Maartje Blankevoort, Leendert van Sterkenburg, Maayke N van Oldenrijk, Jakob van Dijk, C Niek Acta Orthop Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A metallic inlay implant (HemiCAP) with 15 offset sizes has been developed for the treatment of localized osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome. The aim of this study was to test the following hypotheses: (1) a matching offset size is available for each talus, (2) the prosthetic device can be reproducibly implanted slightly recessed in relation to the talar cartilage level, and (3) with this implantation level, excessive contact pressures on the opposite tibial cartilage are avoided. METHODS: The prosthetic device was implanted in 11 intact fresh-frozen human cadaver ankles, aiming its surface 0.5 mm below cartilage level. The implantation level was measured at 4 margins of each implant. Intraarticular contact pressures were measured before and after implantation, with compressive forces of 1,000–2,000 N and the ankle joint in plantigrade position, 10° dorsiflexion, and 14° plantar flexion. RESULTS: There was a matching offset size available for each specimen. The mean implantation level was 0.45 (SD 0.18) mm below the cartilage surface. The defect area accounted for a median of 3% (0.02–18) of the total ankle contact pressure before implantation. This was reduced to 0.1% (0.02–13) after prosthetic implantation. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that the implant can be applied clinically in a safe way, with appropriate offset sizes for various talar domes and without excessive pressure on the opposite cartilage. Informa Healthcare 2010-08 2010-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2917574/ /pubmed/20515434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.492764 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Bergen, Christiaan J A
Zengerink, Maartje
Blankevoort, Leendert
van Sterkenburg, Maayke N
van Oldenrijk, Jakob
van Dijk, C Niek
Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study
title Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study
title_full Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study
title_fullStr Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study
title_full_unstemmed Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study
title_short Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: A cadaver study
title_sort novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome: a cadaver study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20515434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.492764
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbergenchristiaanja novelmetallicimplantationtechniqueforosteochondraldefectsofthemedialtalardomeacadaverstudy
AT zengerinkmaartje novelmetallicimplantationtechniqueforosteochondraldefectsofthemedialtalardomeacadaverstudy
AT blankevoortleendert novelmetallicimplantationtechniqueforosteochondraldefectsofthemedialtalardomeacadaverstudy
AT vansterkenburgmaayken novelmetallicimplantationtechniqueforosteochondraldefectsofthemedialtalardomeacadaverstudy
AT vanoldenrijkjakob novelmetallicimplantationtechniqueforosteochondraldefectsofthemedialtalardomeacadaverstudy
AT vandijkcniek novelmetallicimplantationtechniqueforosteochondraldefectsofthemedialtalardomeacadaverstudy