Cargando…
Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
Background When collecting phenotypic data in clinics across the globe, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) used several techniques that ensured consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the data. Purpose The aim of this article is to describe the procedures used for collection, entry,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20603249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774510373495 |
_version_ | 1782185089637023744 |
---|---|
author | Perdue, Letitia H Albret, Lotte Aldrich, Alan Loth, Amanda Sides, Elizabeth G Dove, Angela Wägner, Ana M Waterman, Rebecca Pierce, June J Akolkar, Beena Steffes, Michael W Hilner, Joan E |
author_facet | Perdue, Letitia H Albret, Lotte Aldrich, Alan Loth, Amanda Sides, Elizabeth G Dove, Angela Wägner, Ana M Waterman, Rebecca Pierce, June J Akolkar, Beena Steffes, Michael W Hilner, Joan E |
author_sort | Perdue, Letitia H |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background When collecting phenotypic data in clinics across the globe, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) used several techniques that ensured consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the data. Purpose The aim of this article is to describe the procedures used for collection, entry, processing, and management of the phenotypic data in this international study. Methods The T1DGC ensured the collection of high quality data using the following procedures throughout the entire study period. The T1DGC used centralized and localized training, required a pilot study, certified all data entry personnel, created standardized data collection forms, reviewed a sample of form sets quarterly throughout the duration of the study, and used a data entry system that provided immediate feedback to those entering the data. Results Due to the intensive procedures in developing the forms, the study was able to uphold consistency among all clinics and minimal changes were required after implementation of the forms. The train-the-trainer model was efficient and only a small number of clinics had to repeat a pilot study. The study was able to maintain a low percentage of missing data (<0.001%) and low duplicate data entry error rate (0.10%). Conclusions It is critical to provide immediate follow-up in order to reinforce training and ensure the quality of the data collected and entered. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2917847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29178472010-08-13 Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium Perdue, Letitia H Albret, Lotte Aldrich, Alan Loth, Amanda Sides, Elizabeth G Dove, Angela Wägner, Ana M Waterman, Rebecca Pierce, June J Akolkar, Beena Steffes, Michael W Hilner, Joan E Clin Trials Articles Background When collecting phenotypic data in clinics across the globe, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) used several techniques that ensured consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the data. Purpose The aim of this article is to describe the procedures used for collection, entry, processing, and management of the phenotypic data in this international study. Methods The T1DGC ensured the collection of high quality data using the following procedures throughout the entire study period. The T1DGC used centralized and localized training, required a pilot study, certified all data entry personnel, created standardized data collection forms, reviewed a sample of form sets quarterly throughout the duration of the study, and used a data entry system that provided immediate feedback to those entering the data. Results Due to the intensive procedures in developing the forms, the study was able to uphold consistency among all clinics and minimal changes were required after implementation of the forms. The train-the-trainer model was efficient and only a small number of clinics had to repeat a pilot study. The study was able to maintain a low percentage of missing data (<0.001%) and low duplicate data entry error rate (0.10%). Conclusions It is critical to provide immediate follow-up in order to reinforce training and ensure the quality of the data collected and entered. SAGE Publications 2010-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2917847/ /pubmed/20603249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774510373495 Text en © The Author(s), 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Perdue, Letitia H Albret, Lotte Aldrich, Alan Loth, Amanda Sides, Elizabeth G Dove, Angela Wägner, Ana M Waterman, Rebecca Pierce, June J Akolkar, Beena Steffes, Michael W Hilner, Joan E Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium |
title | Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics
Consortium |
title_full | Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics
Consortium |
title_fullStr | Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics
Consortium |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics
Consortium |
title_short | Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics
Consortium |
title_sort | quality control of phenotypic forms data in the type 1 diabetes genetics
consortium |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20603249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774510373495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perdueletitiah qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT albretlotte qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT aldrichalan qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT lothamanda qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT sideselizabethg qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT doveangela qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT wagneranam qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT watermanrebecca qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT piercejunej qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT akolkarbeena qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT steffesmichaelw qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT hilnerjoane qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium AT qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium |