Cargando…

Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium

Background When collecting phenotypic data in clinics across the globe, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) used several techniques that ensured consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the data. Purpose The aim of this article is to describe the procedures used for collection, entry,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perdue, Letitia H, Albret, Lotte, Aldrich, Alan, Loth, Amanda, Sides, Elizabeth G, Dove, Angela, Wägner, Ana M, Waterman, Rebecca, Pierce, June J, Akolkar, Beena, Steffes, Michael W, Hilner, Joan E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20603249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774510373495
_version_ 1782185089637023744
author Perdue, Letitia H
Albret, Lotte
Aldrich, Alan
Loth, Amanda
Sides, Elizabeth G
Dove, Angela
Wägner, Ana M
Waterman, Rebecca
Pierce, June J
Akolkar, Beena
Steffes, Michael W
Hilner, Joan E
author_facet Perdue, Letitia H
Albret, Lotte
Aldrich, Alan
Loth, Amanda
Sides, Elizabeth G
Dove, Angela
Wägner, Ana M
Waterman, Rebecca
Pierce, June J
Akolkar, Beena
Steffes, Michael W
Hilner, Joan E
author_sort Perdue, Letitia H
collection PubMed
description Background When collecting phenotypic data in clinics across the globe, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) used several techniques that ensured consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the data. Purpose The aim of this article is to describe the procedures used for collection, entry, processing, and management of the phenotypic data in this international study. Methods The T1DGC ensured the collection of high quality data using the following procedures throughout the entire study period. The T1DGC used centralized and localized training, required a pilot study, certified all data entry personnel, created standardized data collection forms, reviewed a sample of form sets quarterly throughout the duration of the study, and used a data entry system that provided immediate feedback to those entering the data. Results Due to the intensive procedures in developing the forms, the study was able to uphold consistency among all clinics and minimal changes were required after implementation of the forms. The train-the-trainer model was efficient and only a small number of clinics had to repeat a pilot study. The study was able to maintain a low percentage of missing data (<0.001%) and low duplicate data entry error rate (0.10%). Conclusions It is critical to provide immediate follow-up in order to reinforce training and ensure the quality of the data collected and entered.
format Text
id pubmed-2917847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29178472010-08-13 Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium Perdue, Letitia H Albret, Lotte Aldrich, Alan Loth, Amanda Sides, Elizabeth G Dove, Angela Wägner, Ana M Waterman, Rebecca Pierce, June J Akolkar, Beena Steffes, Michael W Hilner, Joan E Clin Trials Articles Background When collecting phenotypic data in clinics across the globe, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) used several techniques that ensured consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the data. Purpose The aim of this article is to describe the procedures used for collection, entry, processing, and management of the phenotypic data in this international study. Methods The T1DGC ensured the collection of high quality data using the following procedures throughout the entire study period. The T1DGC used centralized and localized training, required a pilot study, certified all data entry personnel, created standardized data collection forms, reviewed a sample of form sets quarterly throughout the duration of the study, and used a data entry system that provided immediate feedback to those entering the data. Results Due to the intensive procedures in developing the forms, the study was able to uphold consistency among all clinics and minimal changes were required after implementation of the forms. The train-the-trainer model was efficient and only a small number of clinics had to repeat a pilot study. The study was able to maintain a low percentage of missing data (<0.001%) and low duplicate data entry error rate (0.10%). Conclusions It is critical to provide immediate follow-up in order to reinforce training and ensure the quality of the data collected and entered. SAGE Publications 2010-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2917847/ /pubmed/20603249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774510373495 Text en © The Author(s), 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Perdue, Letitia H
Albret, Lotte
Aldrich, Alan
Loth, Amanda
Sides, Elizabeth G
Dove, Angela
Wägner, Ana M
Waterman, Rebecca
Pierce, June J
Akolkar, Beena
Steffes, Michael W
Hilner, Joan E
Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
title Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
title_full Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
title_fullStr Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
title_full_unstemmed Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
title_short Quality control of phenotypic forms data in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
title_sort quality control of phenotypic forms data in the type 1 diabetes genetics consortium
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20603249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774510373495
work_keys_str_mv AT perdueletitiah qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT albretlotte qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT aldrichalan qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT lothamanda qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT sideselizabethg qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT doveangela qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT wagneranam qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT watermanrebecca qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT piercejunej qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT akolkarbeena qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT steffesmichaelw qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT hilnerjoane qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium
AT qualitycontrolofphenotypicformsdatainthetype1diabetesgeneticsconsortium