Cargando…

Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)

BACKGROUND: Self-tests are available to consumers for more than 25 conditions, ranging from infectious diseases to cardiovascular risk factors. Self-tests are defined as in-vitro tests on body materials such as blood, urine, faeces, or saliva that are initiated by consumers to diagnose a particular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grispen, Janaica EJ, Ickenroth, Martine HP, de Vries, Nanne K, Dinant, Geert-Jan, Ronda, Gaby, van der Weijden, Trudy
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-453
_version_ 1782185192160493568
author Grispen, Janaica EJ
Ickenroth, Martine HP
de Vries, Nanne K
Dinant, Geert-Jan
Ronda, Gaby
van der Weijden, Trudy
author_facet Grispen, Janaica EJ
Ickenroth, Martine HP
de Vries, Nanne K
Dinant, Geert-Jan
Ronda, Gaby
van der Weijden, Trudy
author_sort Grispen, Janaica EJ
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-tests are available to consumers for more than 25 conditions, ranging from infectious diseases to cardiovascular risk factors. Self-tests are defined as in-vitro tests on body materials such as blood, urine, faeces, or saliva that are initiated by consumers to diagnose a particular disorder or risk factor without involving a medical professional. In 2006, 16% of a sample of Dutch Internet users had ever used at least one self-test and 17% intended to use a self-test in the future. The objectives of this study are to determine (1) the frequency of self-test use, (2) the consumers' reasons for using or not using a self-test, (3) the information that is used by self-testers in the different self-test stages and the consumers' interpretation of the quality of this information, (4) the consumers' response to self-test results in terms of their confidence in the result, reassurance by the test result, and follow-up behaviour, (5) the information consumers report to need in the decision making process of using or not using a self-test, and in further management on the basis of the self-test result, and (6) the quality of the currently available consumer information on a selected set of self-tests. METHODS: Mixed methods study with (1) a cross-sectional study consisting of a two-phase Internet-questionnaire, (2) semi-structured interviews with self-testers and consumers who intend to use a self-test, and (3) the assessment of the quality of consumer information of self-tests. The Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour will serve as the theoretical basis for the questionnaires and the interview topic guides. CONCLUSIONS: The self-testing area is still in a state of flux and therefore it is expected that self-test use will increase in the future. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which combines quantitative and qualitative research to identify consumers' information needs and use concerning self-testing, and the consumers' actual follow-up behaviour based on the self-test result, and simultaneously investigates the quality of the currently available consumer information. The results of this study will be used as an input in developing consumer information on self-testing.
format Text
id pubmed-2919481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29194812010-08-11 Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol) Grispen, Janaica EJ Ickenroth, Martine HP de Vries, Nanne K Dinant, Geert-Jan Ronda, Gaby van der Weijden, Trudy BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Self-tests are available to consumers for more than 25 conditions, ranging from infectious diseases to cardiovascular risk factors. Self-tests are defined as in-vitro tests on body materials such as blood, urine, faeces, or saliva that are initiated by consumers to diagnose a particular disorder or risk factor without involving a medical professional. In 2006, 16% of a sample of Dutch Internet users had ever used at least one self-test and 17% intended to use a self-test in the future. The objectives of this study are to determine (1) the frequency of self-test use, (2) the consumers' reasons for using or not using a self-test, (3) the information that is used by self-testers in the different self-test stages and the consumers' interpretation of the quality of this information, (4) the consumers' response to self-test results in terms of their confidence in the result, reassurance by the test result, and follow-up behaviour, (5) the information consumers report to need in the decision making process of using or not using a self-test, and in further management on the basis of the self-test result, and (6) the quality of the currently available consumer information on a selected set of self-tests. METHODS: Mixed methods study with (1) a cross-sectional study consisting of a two-phase Internet-questionnaire, (2) semi-structured interviews with self-testers and consumers who intend to use a self-test, and (3) the assessment of the quality of consumer information of self-tests. The Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour will serve as the theoretical basis for the questionnaires and the interview topic guides. CONCLUSIONS: The self-testing area is still in a state of flux and therefore it is expected that self-test use will increase in the future. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which combines quantitative and qualitative research to identify consumers' information needs and use concerning self-testing, and the consumers' actual follow-up behaviour based on the self-test result, and simultaneously investigates the quality of the currently available consumer information. The results of this study will be used as an input in developing consumer information on self-testing. BioMed Central 2010-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2919481/ /pubmed/20682031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-453 Text en Copyright ©2010 Grispen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Grispen, Janaica EJ
Ickenroth, Martine HP
de Vries, Nanne K
Dinant, Geert-Jan
Ronda, Gaby
van der Weijden, Trudy
Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_full Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_fullStr Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_full_unstemmed Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_short Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
title_sort improving behaviour in self-testing (ibis): study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-453
work_keys_str_mv AT grispenjanaicaej improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT ickenrothmartinehp improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT devriesnannek improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT dinantgeertjan improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT rondagaby improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol
AT vanderweijdentrudy improvingbehaviourinselftestingibisstudyonfrequencyofuseconsequencesinformationneedsanduseandqualityofcurrentlyavailableconsumerinformationprotocol