Cargando…

Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings

BACKGROUND: Preventing disability and offering effective interventions to older people during early decline in function is most likely to be effective if those most at risk of progressive disablement are able to be identified. Similarly the ability to easily identify a group with similar functional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson, Kate, Day, Lesley, Hill, Keith D, Jolley, Damien, Newstead, Stuart, Cicuttini, Flavia, Segal, Leonie, Flicker, Leon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20678235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-52
_version_ 1782185200128622592
author Gibson, Kate
Day, Lesley
Hill, Keith D
Jolley, Damien
Newstead, Stuart
Cicuttini, Flavia
Segal, Leonie
Flicker, Leon
author_facet Gibson, Kate
Day, Lesley
Hill, Keith D
Jolley, Damien
Newstead, Stuart
Cicuttini, Flavia
Segal, Leonie
Flicker, Leon
author_sort Gibson, Kate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preventing disability and offering effective interventions to older people during early decline in function is most likely to be effective if those most at risk of progressive disablement are able to be identified. Similarly the ability to easily identify a group with similar functional profile from disparate sectors of the community is of significant benefit to researchers. This study aimed to (1) describe the use of a pre-clinical disability screening tool to select a functionally comparable group of older men and women with early functional limitation from different settings, and (2) explore factors associated with function and disability. METHODS: Self-reported function and disability measured with the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument along with a range of physical performance measurements were compared across residential settings and gender in a sample of 471 trial participants identified as pre-clinically disabled after being screened with the Fried pre-clinical disability tool. Factors that might lie on the pathway to progressive disablement were identified using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: We found that a sample population, screened for pre-clinical disability, had a functional status and disability profile reflecting early functional limitation, regardless of residential setting or gender. Statistical models identified a range of factors associated with function and disability which explained a greater degree of the variation in function, than disability. CONCLUSIONS: We selected a group of people with a comparable function and disability profile, consistent with the pre-clinical stage of disability, from a sample of older Australian men and women from different residential settings using the Fried pre-clinical disability screening tool. The results suggest that the screening tool can be used with greater confidence for research, clinical and population health purposes. Further research is required to examine the validity of the tool. These findings offer insight into the type of impairment factors characterising early functional loss that could be addressed through disability prevention initiatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN01206000431527
format Text
id pubmed-2919540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29195402010-08-11 Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings Gibson, Kate Day, Lesley Hill, Keith D Jolley, Damien Newstead, Stuart Cicuttini, Flavia Segal, Leonie Flicker, Leon BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Preventing disability and offering effective interventions to older people during early decline in function is most likely to be effective if those most at risk of progressive disablement are able to be identified. Similarly the ability to easily identify a group with similar functional profile from disparate sectors of the community is of significant benefit to researchers. This study aimed to (1) describe the use of a pre-clinical disability screening tool to select a functionally comparable group of older men and women with early functional limitation from different settings, and (2) explore factors associated with function and disability. METHODS: Self-reported function and disability measured with the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument along with a range of physical performance measurements were compared across residential settings and gender in a sample of 471 trial participants identified as pre-clinically disabled after being screened with the Fried pre-clinical disability tool. Factors that might lie on the pathway to progressive disablement were identified using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: We found that a sample population, screened for pre-clinical disability, had a functional status and disability profile reflecting early functional limitation, regardless of residential setting or gender. Statistical models identified a range of factors associated with function and disability which explained a greater degree of the variation in function, than disability. CONCLUSIONS: We selected a group of people with a comparable function and disability profile, consistent with the pre-clinical stage of disability, from a sample of older Australian men and women from different residential settings using the Fried pre-clinical disability screening tool. The results suggest that the screening tool can be used with greater confidence for research, clinical and population health purposes. Further research is required to examine the validity of the tool. These findings offer insight into the type of impairment factors characterising early functional loss that could be addressed through disability prevention initiatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN01206000431527 BioMed Central 2010-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2919540/ /pubmed/20678235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-52 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gibson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gibson, Kate
Day, Lesley
Hill, Keith D
Jolley, Damien
Newstead, Stuart
Cicuttini, Flavia
Segal, Leonie
Flicker, Leon
Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings
title Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings
title_full Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings
title_fullStr Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings
title_full_unstemmed Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings
title_short Screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings
title_sort screening for pre-clinical disability in different residential settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20678235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-52
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsonkate screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings
AT daylesley screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings
AT hillkeithd screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings
AT jolleydamien screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings
AT newsteadstuart screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings
AT cicuttiniflavia screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings
AT segalleonie screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings
AT flickerleon screeningforpreclinicaldisabilityindifferentresidentialsettings