Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhangjing, Wu, Jufang, Zhang, Yingyuan, Wei, Junming, Leng, Xisheng, Bi, Jianwei, Li, Rong, Yan, Lunan, Quan, Zhiwei, Chen, Xiaoping, Yu, Yunsong, Wu, Zhiyong, Liu, Dawei, Ma, Xiaochun, Maroko, Robert, Cooper, Angel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-217
_version_ 1782185324109103104
author Chen, Zhangjing
Wu, Jufang
Zhang, Yingyuan
Wei, Junming
Leng, Xisheng
Bi, Jianwei
Li, Rong
Yan, Lunan
Quan, Zhiwei
Chen, Xiaoping
Yu, Yunsong
Wu, Zhiyong
Liu, Dawei
Ma, Xiaochun
Maroko, Robert
Cooper, Angel
author_facet Chen, Zhangjing
Wu, Jufang
Zhang, Yingyuan
Wei, Junming
Leng, Xisheng
Bi, Jianwei
Li, Rong
Yan, Lunan
Quan, Zhiwei
Chen, Xiaoping
Yu, Yunsong
Wu, Zhiyong
Liu, Dawei
Ma, Xiaochun
Maroko, Robert
Cooper, Angel
author_sort Chen, Zhangjing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. In the current trial, tigecycline was evaluated for safety and efficacy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in hospitalized Chinese patients with cIAIs. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to receive IV tigecycline or imipenem/cilastatin for ≤2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-37 days after therapy) for the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat and microbiologically evaluable populations. Because the study was not powered to demonstrate non-inferiority between tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin, no formal statistical analysis was performed. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the response rates in each treatment group and for differences between treatment groups for descriptive purposes. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients received ≥1 dose of study drug and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. In the microbiologically evaluable population, 86.5% (45 of 52) of tigecycline- and 97.9% (47 of 48) of imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients were cured at the test-of-cure assessment (12-37 days after therapy); in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population, cure rates were 81.7% (49 of 60) and 90.9% (50 of 55), respectively. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 80.4% for tigecycline vs. 53.9% after imipenem/cilastatin therapy (P < 0.001), primarily due to gastrointestinal-related events, especially nausea (21.6% vs. 3.9%; P < 0.001) and vomiting (12.4% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical cure rates for tigecycline were consistent with those found in global cIAI studies. The overall safety profile was also consistent with that observed in global studies of tigecycline for treatment of cIAI, as well as that observed in analyses of Chinese patients in those studies; no novel trends were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00136201
format Text
id pubmed-2920872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29208722010-08-13 Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial Chen, Zhangjing Wu, Jufang Zhang, Yingyuan Wei, Junming Leng, Xisheng Bi, Jianwei Li, Rong Yan, Lunan Quan, Zhiwei Chen, Xiaoping Yu, Yunsong Wu, Zhiyong Liu, Dawei Ma, Xiaochun Maroko, Robert Cooper, Angel BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. In the current trial, tigecycline was evaluated for safety and efficacy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in hospitalized Chinese patients with cIAIs. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to receive IV tigecycline or imipenem/cilastatin for ≤2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-37 days after therapy) for the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat and microbiologically evaluable populations. Because the study was not powered to demonstrate non-inferiority between tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin, no formal statistical analysis was performed. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the response rates in each treatment group and for differences between treatment groups for descriptive purposes. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients received ≥1 dose of study drug and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. In the microbiologically evaluable population, 86.5% (45 of 52) of tigecycline- and 97.9% (47 of 48) of imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients were cured at the test-of-cure assessment (12-37 days after therapy); in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population, cure rates were 81.7% (49 of 60) and 90.9% (50 of 55), respectively. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 80.4% for tigecycline vs. 53.9% after imipenem/cilastatin therapy (P < 0.001), primarily due to gastrointestinal-related events, especially nausea (21.6% vs. 3.9%; P < 0.001) and vomiting (12.4% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical cure rates for tigecycline were consistent with those found in global cIAI studies. The overall safety profile was also consistent with that observed in global studies of tigecycline for treatment of cIAI, as well as that observed in analyses of Chinese patients in those studies; no novel trends were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00136201 BioMed Central 2010-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2920872/ /pubmed/20663130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-217 Text en Copyright ©2010 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Zhangjing
Wu, Jufang
Zhang, Yingyuan
Wei, Junming
Leng, Xisheng
Bi, Jianwei
Li, Rong
Yan, Lunan
Quan, Zhiwei
Chen, Xiaoping
Yu, Yunsong
Wu, Zhiyong
Liu, Dawei
Ma, Xiaochun
Maroko, Robert
Cooper, Angel
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-217
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhangjing efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wujufang efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangyingyuan efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weijunming efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lengxisheng efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bijianwei efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lirong efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yanlunan efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT quanzhiwei efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenxiaoping efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuyunsong efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuzhiyong efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liudawei efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maxiaochun efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marokorobert efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cooperangel efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial