Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic ba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-217 |
_version_ | 1782185324109103104 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Zhangjing Wu, Jufang Zhang, Yingyuan Wei, Junming Leng, Xisheng Bi, Jianwei Li, Rong Yan, Lunan Quan, Zhiwei Chen, Xiaoping Yu, Yunsong Wu, Zhiyong Liu, Dawei Ma, Xiaochun Maroko, Robert Cooper, Angel |
author_facet | Chen, Zhangjing Wu, Jufang Zhang, Yingyuan Wei, Junming Leng, Xisheng Bi, Jianwei Li, Rong Yan, Lunan Quan, Zhiwei Chen, Xiaoping Yu, Yunsong Wu, Zhiyong Liu, Dawei Ma, Xiaochun Maroko, Robert Cooper, Angel |
author_sort | Chen, Zhangjing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. In the current trial, tigecycline was evaluated for safety and efficacy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in hospitalized Chinese patients with cIAIs. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to receive IV tigecycline or imipenem/cilastatin for ≤2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-37 days after therapy) for the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat and microbiologically evaluable populations. Because the study was not powered to demonstrate non-inferiority between tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin, no formal statistical analysis was performed. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the response rates in each treatment group and for differences between treatment groups for descriptive purposes. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients received ≥1 dose of study drug and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. In the microbiologically evaluable population, 86.5% (45 of 52) of tigecycline- and 97.9% (47 of 48) of imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients were cured at the test-of-cure assessment (12-37 days after therapy); in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population, cure rates were 81.7% (49 of 60) and 90.9% (50 of 55), respectively. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 80.4% for tigecycline vs. 53.9% after imipenem/cilastatin therapy (P < 0.001), primarily due to gastrointestinal-related events, especially nausea (21.6% vs. 3.9%; P < 0.001) and vomiting (12.4% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical cure rates for tigecycline were consistent with those found in global cIAI studies. The overall safety profile was also consistent with that observed in global studies of tigecycline for treatment of cIAI, as well as that observed in analyses of Chinese patients in those studies; no novel trends were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00136201 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2920872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29208722010-08-13 Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial Chen, Zhangjing Wu, Jufang Zhang, Yingyuan Wei, Junming Leng, Xisheng Bi, Jianwei Li, Rong Yan, Lunan Quan, Zhiwei Chen, Xiaoping Yu, Yunsong Wu, Zhiyong Liu, Dawei Ma, Xiaochun Maroko, Robert Cooper, Angel BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. In the current trial, tigecycline was evaluated for safety and efficacy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in hospitalized Chinese patients with cIAIs. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to receive IV tigecycline or imipenem/cilastatin for ≤2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-37 days after therapy) for the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat and microbiologically evaluable populations. Because the study was not powered to demonstrate non-inferiority between tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin, no formal statistical analysis was performed. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the response rates in each treatment group and for differences between treatment groups for descriptive purposes. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients received ≥1 dose of study drug and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. In the microbiologically evaluable population, 86.5% (45 of 52) of tigecycline- and 97.9% (47 of 48) of imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients were cured at the test-of-cure assessment (12-37 days after therapy); in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population, cure rates were 81.7% (49 of 60) and 90.9% (50 of 55), respectively. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 80.4% for tigecycline vs. 53.9% after imipenem/cilastatin therapy (P < 0.001), primarily due to gastrointestinal-related events, especially nausea (21.6% vs. 3.9%; P < 0.001) and vomiting (12.4% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical cure rates for tigecycline were consistent with those found in global cIAI studies. The overall safety profile was also consistent with that observed in global studies of tigecycline for treatment of cIAI, as well as that observed in analyses of Chinese patients in those studies; no novel trends were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00136201 BioMed Central 2010-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2920872/ /pubmed/20663130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-217 Text en Copyright ©2010 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Zhangjing Wu, Jufang Zhang, Yingyuan Wei, Junming Leng, Xisheng Bi, Jianwei Li, Rong Yan, Lunan Quan, Zhiwei Chen, Xiaoping Yu, Yunsong Wu, Zhiyong Liu, Dawei Ma, Xiaochun Maroko, Robert Cooper, Angel Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenzhangjing efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wujufang efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangyingyuan efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weijunming efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lengxisheng efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bijianwei efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lirong efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yanlunan efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT quanzhiwei efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenxiaoping efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yuyunsong efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuzhiyong efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liudawei efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maxiaochun efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marokorobert efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cooperangel efficacyandsafetyoftigecyclinemonotherapyvsimipenemcilastatininchinesepatientswithcomplicatedintraabdominalinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |