Cargando…

Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags

Intense interest centers on the role of the human gut microbiome in health and disease, but optimal methods for analysis are still under development. Here we present a study of methods for surveying bacterial communities in human feces using 454/Roche pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene tags. We analyze...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Gary D, Lewis, James D, Hoffmann, Christian, Chen, Ying-Yu, Knight, Rob, Bittinger, Kyle, Hwang, Jennifer, Chen, Jun, Berkowsky, Ronald, Nessel, Lisa, Li, Hongzhe, Bushman, Frederic D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20673359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206
_version_ 1782185389551779840
author Wu, Gary D
Lewis, James D
Hoffmann, Christian
Chen, Ying-Yu
Knight, Rob
Bittinger, Kyle
Hwang, Jennifer
Chen, Jun
Berkowsky, Ronald
Nessel, Lisa
Li, Hongzhe
Bushman, Frederic D
author_facet Wu, Gary D
Lewis, James D
Hoffmann, Christian
Chen, Ying-Yu
Knight, Rob
Bittinger, Kyle
Hwang, Jennifer
Chen, Jun
Berkowsky, Ronald
Nessel, Lisa
Li, Hongzhe
Bushman, Frederic D
author_sort Wu, Gary D
collection PubMed
description Intense interest centers on the role of the human gut microbiome in health and disease, but optimal methods for analysis are still under development. Here we present a study of methods for surveying bacterial communities in human feces using 454/Roche pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene tags. We analyzed fecal samples from 10 individuals and compared methods for storage, DNA purification and sequence acquisition. To assess reproducibility, we compared samples one cm apart on a single stool specimen for each individual. To analyze storage methods, we compared 1) immediate freezing at -80°C, 2) storage on ice for 24 or 3) 48 hours. For DNA purification methods, we tested three commercial kits and bead beating in hot phenol. Variations due to the different methodologies were compared to variation among individuals using two approaches--one based on presence-absence information for bacterial taxa (unweighted UniFrac) and the other taking into account their relative abundance (weighted UniFrac). In the unweighted analysis relatively little variation was associated with the different analytical procedures, and variation between individuals predominated. In the weighted analysis considerable variation was associated with the purification methods. Particularly notable was improved recovery of Firmicutes sequences using the hot phenol method. We also carried out surveys of the effects of different 454 sequencing methods (FLX versus Titanium) and amplification of different 16S rRNA variable gene segments. Based on our findings we present recommendations for protocols to collect, process and sequence bacterial 16S rDNA from fecal samples--some major points are 1) if feasible, bead-beating in hot phenol or use of the PSP kit improves recovery; 2) storage methods can be adjusted based on experimental convenience; 3) unweighted (presence-absence) comparisons are less affected by lysis method.
format Text
id pubmed-2921404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29214042010-08-14 Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags Wu, Gary D Lewis, James D Hoffmann, Christian Chen, Ying-Yu Knight, Rob Bittinger, Kyle Hwang, Jennifer Chen, Jun Berkowsky, Ronald Nessel, Lisa Li, Hongzhe Bushman, Frederic D BMC Microbiol Methodology Article Intense interest centers on the role of the human gut microbiome in health and disease, but optimal methods for analysis are still under development. Here we present a study of methods for surveying bacterial communities in human feces using 454/Roche pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene tags. We analyzed fecal samples from 10 individuals and compared methods for storage, DNA purification and sequence acquisition. To assess reproducibility, we compared samples one cm apart on a single stool specimen for each individual. To analyze storage methods, we compared 1) immediate freezing at -80°C, 2) storage on ice for 24 or 3) 48 hours. For DNA purification methods, we tested three commercial kits and bead beating in hot phenol. Variations due to the different methodologies were compared to variation among individuals using two approaches--one based on presence-absence information for bacterial taxa (unweighted UniFrac) and the other taking into account their relative abundance (weighted UniFrac). In the unweighted analysis relatively little variation was associated with the different analytical procedures, and variation between individuals predominated. In the weighted analysis considerable variation was associated with the purification methods. Particularly notable was improved recovery of Firmicutes sequences using the hot phenol method. We also carried out surveys of the effects of different 454 sequencing methods (FLX versus Titanium) and amplification of different 16S rRNA variable gene segments. Based on our findings we present recommendations for protocols to collect, process and sequence bacterial 16S rDNA from fecal samples--some major points are 1) if feasible, bead-beating in hot phenol or use of the PSP kit improves recovery; 2) storage methods can be adjusted based on experimental convenience; 3) unweighted (presence-absence) comparisons are less affected by lysis method. BioMed Central 2010-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2921404/ /pubmed/20673359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206 Text en Copyright ©2010 Wu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Wu, Gary D
Lewis, James D
Hoffmann, Christian
Chen, Ying-Yu
Knight, Rob
Bittinger, Kyle
Hwang, Jennifer
Chen, Jun
Berkowsky, Ronald
Nessel, Lisa
Li, Hongzhe
Bushman, Frederic D
Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
title Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
title_full Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
title_fullStr Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
title_full_unstemmed Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
title_short Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
title_sort sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16s sequence tags
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20673359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206
work_keys_str_mv AT wugaryd samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT lewisjamesd samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT hoffmannchristian samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT chenyingyu samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT knightrob samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT bittingerkyle samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT hwangjennifer samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT chenjun samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT berkowskyronald samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT nessellisa samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT lihongzhe samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags
AT bushmanfredericd samplingandpyrosequencingmethodsforcharacterizingbacterialcommunitiesinthehumangutusing16ssequencetags