Cargando…

Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate pediatric residents' ability to correctly identify electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and pair them to a corresponding cardiac diagnosis. METHODS: Forty-six pediatric residents from the Johns Hopkins Children's Center were survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crocetti, Michael, Thompson, Reid
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20814469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.64356
_version_ 1782185398442655744
author Crocetti, Michael
Thompson, Reid
author_facet Crocetti, Michael
Thompson, Reid
author_sort Crocetti, Michael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate pediatric residents' ability to correctly identify electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and pair them to a corresponding cardiac diagnosis. METHODS: Forty-six pediatric residents from the Johns Hopkins Children's Center were surveyed to evaluate their ability to interpret ECGs and factors affecting that ability. Included in the survey was a packet of 10 patient vignettes each accompanied by a 12-lead ECG. The primary outcome variable was the resident's score of correctly paired ECG findings with the appropriate cardiac diagnosis. One point was given for each pair correctly identified for a maximum of 10 points. Simple and multiple linear regression was used to estimate the magnitude and significance of any association between score of correct responses and resident year, completion of a pediatric cardiology rotation, self-rated ability to read ECGs, and training received in reading ECGs. RESULTS: The mean number of correct ECG findings and cardiac diagnosis pairings out of 10 for the PGY 1 group was 4.1 ± 3, PGY 2 group 4.9 ± 2.9, PGY 3 group 6.6 ± 2, and the PGY 4 group 6.8 ± 1.7. In the unadjusted linear regression model, the PGY 3 group correctly identified 2.4 more pairings compared to the PGY 1 group (P =0.02). Those who completed a pediatric cardiology rotation correctly identified 2.5 more pairings compared to those who did not complete a rotation (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG interpretation significantly improved from PGY 1 to PGY 3. Educational programs involving ECG interpretation should target those diagnoses with high clinical severity and average to poor resident knowledge.
format Text
id pubmed-2921514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29215142010-09-02 Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents Crocetti, Michael Thompson, Reid Ann Pediatr Cardiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate pediatric residents' ability to correctly identify electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and pair them to a corresponding cardiac diagnosis. METHODS: Forty-six pediatric residents from the Johns Hopkins Children's Center were surveyed to evaluate their ability to interpret ECGs and factors affecting that ability. Included in the survey was a packet of 10 patient vignettes each accompanied by a 12-lead ECG. The primary outcome variable was the resident's score of correctly paired ECG findings with the appropriate cardiac diagnosis. One point was given for each pair correctly identified for a maximum of 10 points. Simple and multiple linear regression was used to estimate the magnitude and significance of any association between score of correct responses and resident year, completion of a pediatric cardiology rotation, self-rated ability to read ECGs, and training received in reading ECGs. RESULTS: The mean number of correct ECG findings and cardiac diagnosis pairings out of 10 for the PGY 1 group was 4.1 ± 3, PGY 2 group 4.9 ± 2.9, PGY 3 group 6.6 ± 2, and the PGY 4 group 6.8 ± 1.7. In the unadjusted linear regression model, the PGY 3 group correctly identified 2.4 more pairings compared to the PGY 1 group (P =0.02). Those who completed a pediatric cardiology rotation correctly identified 2.5 more pairings compared to those who did not complete a rotation (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG interpretation significantly improved from PGY 1 to PGY 3. Educational programs involving ECG interpretation should target those diagnoses with high clinical severity and average to poor resident knowledge. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2921514/ /pubmed/20814469 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.64356 Text en © Annals of Pediatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Crocetti, Michael
Thompson, Reid
Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents
title Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents
title_full Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents
title_fullStr Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents
title_full_unstemmed Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents
title_short Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents
title_sort electrocardiogram interpretation skills in pediatric residents
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20814469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2069.64356
work_keys_str_mv AT crocettimichael electrocardiograminterpretationskillsinpediatricresidents
AT thompsonreid electrocardiograminterpretationskillsinpediatricresidents