Cargando…
The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique
BACKGROUND: No documentation in the literature about taper of cast posts. This study was conducted to measure the degree of cast posts taper, and to evaluate its suitability based on the anatomy aspects of the common candidate teeth for post reconstruction. METHODS: Working casts for cast posts, pre...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20684751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-10-19 |
_version_ | 1782185410585165824 |
---|---|
author | Al Hamad, Khaled Q Al-Omari, Faruq A Al Hyiasat, Ahmad S |
author_facet | Al Hamad, Khaled Q Al-Omari, Faruq A Al Hyiasat, Ahmad S |
author_sort | Al Hamad, Khaled Q |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No documentation in the literature about taper of cast posts. This study was conducted to measure the degree of cast posts taper, and to evaluate its suitability based on the anatomy aspects of the common candidate teeth for post reconstruction. METHODS: Working casts for cast posts, prepared using Gates Glidden drills, were collected. Impressions of post spaces were made using polyvinyl siloxan putty/wash technique. Digital camera with a 10' high quality lens was used for capturing two digital images for each impression; one in the Facio-Lingual (FL) and the other in the Mesio-Distal (MD) directions. Automated image processing program was developed to measure the degree of canal taper. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software and One way Analysis of Variance. RESULTS: Eighty four dies for cast posts were collected: 16 for each maxillary anterior teeth subgroup, and 18 for each maxillary and mandibular premolar subgroup. Mean of total taper for all preparations was 10.7 degree. There were no statistical differences among the total taper of all groups (P = .256) or between the MD and FL taper for each subgroup. Mean FL taper for the maxillary first premolars was lower significantly (P = .003) than the maxillary FL taper of the second premolars. FL taper was higher than the MD taper in all teeth except the maxillary first premolars. CONCLUSIONS: Taper produced did not reflect the differences among the anatomy of teeth. While this technique deemed satisfactory in the maxillary anterior teeth, the same could not be said for the maxillary first premolars. Careful attention to the root anatomy is mandatory. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2922075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29220752010-08-17 The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique Al Hamad, Khaled Q Al-Omari, Faruq A Al Hyiasat, Ahmad S BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: No documentation in the literature about taper of cast posts. This study was conducted to measure the degree of cast posts taper, and to evaluate its suitability based on the anatomy aspects of the common candidate teeth for post reconstruction. METHODS: Working casts for cast posts, prepared using Gates Glidden drills, were collected. Impressions of post spaces were made using polyvinyl siloxan putty/wash technique. Digital camera with a 10' high quality lens was used for capturing two digital images for each impression; one in the Facio-Lingual (FL) and the other in the Mesio-Distal (MD) directions. Automated image processing program was developed to measure the degree of canal taper. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software and One way Analysis of Variance. RESULTS: Eighty four dies for cast posts were collected: 16 for each maxillary anterior teeth subgroup, and 18 for each maxillary and mandibular premolar subgroup. Mean of total taper for all preparations was 10.7 degree. There were no statistical differences among the total taper of all groups (P = .256) or between the MD and FL taper for each subgroup. Mean FL taper for the maxillary first premolars was lower significantly (P = .003) than the maxillary FL taper of the second premolars. FL taper was higher than the MD taper in all teeth except the maxillary first premolars. CONCLUSIONS: Taper produced did not reflect the differences among the anatomy of teeth. While this technique deemed satisfactory in the maxillary anterior teeth, the same could not be said for the maxillary first premolars. Careful attention to the root anatomy is mandatory. BioMed Central 2010-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2922075/ /pubmed/20684751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-10-19 Text en Copyright ©2010 Al Hamad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Al Hamad, Khaled Q Al-Omari, Faruq A Al Hyiasat, Ahmad S The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique |
title | The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique |
title_full | The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique |
title_fullStr | The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique |
title_full_unstemmed | The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique |
title_short | The taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique |
title_sort | taper of cast post preparation measured using innovative image processing technique |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20684751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-10-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alhamadkhaledq thetaperofcastpostpreparationmeasuredusinginnovativeimageprocessingtechnique AT alomarifaruqa thetaperofcastpostpreparationmeasuredusinginnovativeimageprocessingtechnique AT alhyiasatahmads thetaperofcastpostpreparationmeasuredusinginnovativeimageprocessingtechnique AT alhamadkhaledq taperofcastpostpreparationmeasuredusinginnovativeimageprocessingtechnique AT alomarifaruqa taperofcastpostpreparationmeasuredusinginnovativeimageprocessingtechnique AT alhyiasatahmads taperofcastpostpreparationmeasuredusinginnovativeimageprocessingtechnique |